A comparison of landscape metrics for conservation planning

This study examined the extent to which commonly used and easily obtained landscape metrics contribute to a conservation planning process that must be completed rapidly and economically. Specifically, we aimed to determine if landscape metrics could be used to guide the prioritization process when the importance of sites to conservation portfolios is measured in terms of irreplaceability, as measured by the probability that a particular site will be required in conservation reserve network. This question was examined in the context of a flexible planning process where the size of a conservation portfolio may vary over time. We used avian survey data from 35 riparian forest sites in central Ohio to calculate irreplaceability scores for each site. Landscape composition within a 1-km radius of each site was measured as the number of buildings and the percent forest, agriculture, roads, pavement and mowed surfaces. Multinomial logistic regression models were created and compared using Akaike Information Criterion. Results suggest that when predicting the irreplaceability value of a site, a simple yet effective method involves the use of forest coverage at the landscape-level plus one metric measuring human disturbance. This result appears to hold across a range of portfolio sizes and is therefore useful even in the context of a planning process that varies in scope over time.

[1]  L. Brooker.  The application of focal species knowledge to landscape design in agricultural lands using the ecological neighbourhood as a template , 2002 .

[2]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[3]  Edward A. Cook,et al.  Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks , 2002 .

[4]  T. Hetherington,et al.  Core terrestrial habitat for conservation of local populations of salamanders and wood frogs in agricultural landscapes , 2004 .

[5]  Charles ReVelle,et al.  Metropolitan Open‐Space Protection with Uncertain Site Availability , 2005 .

[6]  W. Daniel Edge,et al.  RIPARIAN BIRD COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN PORTLAND, OREGON: HABITAT, URBANIZATION, AND SPATIAL SCALE PATTERNS , 2003 .

[7]  Mark E. Jakubauskas,et al.  A comparison of satellite data and landscape variables in predicting bird species occurrences in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  Zhiliang Zhu,et al.  Integrating Habitat Status, Human Population Pressure, and Protection Status into Biodiversity Conservation Priority Setting , 2005 .

[9]  G. Hess,et al.  Designing suburban greenways to provide habitat for forest-breeding birds , 2007 .

[10]  T. Brooks,et al.  Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities , 2006, Science.

[11]  N. T. Hobbs,et al.  EFFECTS OF HUMAN SETTLEMENT ON BIRD COMMUNITIES IN LOWLAND RIPARIAN AREAS OF COLORADO (USA) , 2003 .

[12]  Y. Wiersma,et al.  Models to distinguish effects of landscape patterns and human population pressures associated with species loss in Canadian national parks , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  Marja H. Bakermans,et al.  What is the appropriate paradigm for riparian forest conservation , 2006 .

[14]  P. Eagles,et al.  Effects of Residential Development on Forest-Dwelling Neotropical Migrant Songbirds , 1995 .

[15]  Peter N. Duinker,et al.  BIODIVERSITY CONSIDERATIONS IN CONSERVATION SYSTEM PLANNING: MAP-BASED APPROACH FOR NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA , 2005 .

[16]  Katherine A. Eschelbach,et al.  Comparing the potential effectiveness of conservation planning approaches in central North Carolina, USA , 2006 .

[17]  Will R Turner,et al.  Adaptive Decision Rules for the Acquisition of Nature Reserves , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[18]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Replacement cost: A practical measure of site value for cost-effective reserve planning , 2006 .

[19]  Steven R. Beissinger,et al.  REPORT OF THE AOU CONSERVATION COMMITTEE ON THE PARTNERS IN FLIGHT SPECIES PRIORITIZATION PLAN , 2000 .

[20]  Anastasios Legakis,et al.  Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation , 2004 .

[21]  Craig W. Johnson.  Planning and designing for the multiple use role of habitats in urban/suburban landscapes in the Great Basin , 1995 .

[22]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Effectiveness of land classes as surrogates for species in conservation planning for the Cape Floristic Region , 2003 .

[23]  T. Brooks,et al.  Protected Areas and Species , 2004 .

[24]  R L Pressey,et al.  Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Susan M. Galatowitsch,et al.  Anthropogenic effects on the biodiversity of riparian wetlands of a northern temperate landscape , 1998 .

[26]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Designing Systematic Conservation Assessments that Promote Effective Implementation: Best Practice from South Africa , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[27]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts , 2006, Nature.

[28]  L. K. Harris,et al.  A model for assessing wildlife habitats in urban landscapes of eastern Pima County, Arizona (USA) , 2003 .

[29]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world , 2004 .

[30]  K. A. Poiani,et al.  Identifying Conservation‐Priority Areas in a Fragmented Minnesota Landscape Based on the Umbrella Species Concept and Selection of Large Patches of Natural Vegetation , 2001 .

[31]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity prioritisation across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands , 2006 .

[32]  J. Wunderlich,et al.  Ranking protected areas in the Azores using standardised sampling of soil epigean arthropods , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[33]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Complementarity analysis: Mapping the performance of surrogates for biodiversity , 2006 .

[34]  S. Rottenborn.  Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities , 1999 .