Reversed-polarity items and scale unidimensionality

A standard procedure in the development of multi-item measurement scales is to incorporate reversed-polarity items to control for and/or identify acquiescence response bias. In spite of the broad acceptance of this approach, very little work has been done to evaluate the impact of reversed-polarity items on the dimensionality of scales. This study empirically evaluates the impact of reversed-polarity items on the unidimensionality of several well-known marketing measures. The authors suggest that use of reversed-polarity items may present a substantive problem for marketing scholars because of the resulting degradation of scale unidimensionality. The existence of this phenomenon is confirmed in a multisurvey, multiscale, binational research design. Implications for marketing scale developers and measurement theoreticians are discussed, theoretical bases that might explain the phenomenon are explored, and further research suggestions are presented.

[1]  Michael J. Swenson,et al.  Social values and salesperson performance: An empirical examination , 1994 .

[2]  R. Baron,et al.  Negative Emotion and Message Processing , 1994 .

[3]  R. Oliver.  Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. , 1993 .

[4]  John R. Hauser,et al.  How Consumers Allocate Their Time When Searching for Information , 1993 .

[5]  Emily S. Reber,et al.  Directional Questions Direct Self-Conceptions , 1993 .

[6]  Cornelia Pechmann,et al.  Predicting when Two-Sided Ads will be More Effective than One-Sided Ads: The Role of Correlational and Correspondent Inferences , 1992 .

[7]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[8]  Paul E. Spector.  Summated rating scale construction , 1991 .

[9]  Maryanne M. Mowen,et al.  Time and Outcome Valuation: Implications for Marketing Decision Making , 1991 .

[10]  Robert E. Widing,et al.  Customer evaluation of retail salespeople utilizing the SOCO scale: A replication, extension, and application , 1991 .

[11]  Donald R. Lichtenstein,et al.  A Cross-National Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the CETSCALE: , 1991 .

[12]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Supervisory Feedback: Alternative Types and Their Impact on Salespeople's Performance and Satisfaction , 1991 .

[13]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. , 1991 .

[14]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  A validity study of a measure of opinion leadership , 1991 .

[15]  Manohar U. Kalwani,et al.  A Price Expectations Model of Customer Brand Choice , 1990 .

[16]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement , 1990 .

[17]  Michael Conway,et al.  Consensus and causal attributions for negative affect , 1990 .

[18]  J. Carman.  Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions , 1990 .

[19]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Adaptive Selling: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Nomological Validity: , 1990 .

[20]  B. Byrne.  A Primer of Lisrel: Basic Applications and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Models , 1989 .

[21]  J. Klayman,et al.  Hypothesis testing in rule discovery: Strategy, structure, and content. , 1989 .

[22]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. , 1989 .

[23]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[24]  J. Hunter,et al.  On the Assessment of Unidimensional Measurement: Internal and External Consistency, and Overall Consistency Criteria , 1987 .

[25]  R. Westbrook.  Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes , 1987 .

[26]  Subhash Sharma,et al.  Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE: , 1987 .

[27]  Paul E. Spector.  Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? , 1987 .

[28]  W. F. Anderson,et al.  Children's Causal Attributions to Self and Other as a Function of Outcome and Task. , 1987 .

[29]  William R. Dillon,et al.  The Interaction of Measurement and Structure in Simultaneous Equation Models with Unobservable Variables , 1987 .

[30]  David E. Kanouse,et al.  Negativity in evaluations. , 1987 .

[31]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Knowledge, motivation, and adaptive behavior : a framework for improving selling effectiveness , 1986 .

[32]  R. Day,et al.  Measuring Customer Orientation of Salespeople: A Replication with Industrial Buyers , 1985 .

[33]  John Hattie,et al.  Methodology Review: Assessing Unidimensionality of Tests and ltenls , 1985 .

[34]  J. Ray.  Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. , 1983 .

[35]  C. Craig,et al.  International Marketing Research , 1983 .

[36]  P. Heaven.  Authoritarianism or Acquiescence? South African Findings , 1983 .

[37]  David E. Kanouse,et al.  Controlling for Acquiescence Response Set in Scale Development , 1982 .

[38]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  The SOCO Scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. , 1982 .

[39]  Roderick P. McDonald,et al.  The dimensionality of tests and items , 1981 .

[40]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. , 1980 .

[41]  J. Ray.  Is the acquiescent response style problem not so mythical after all? Some results from a successful balanced F scale. , 1979, Journal of personality assessment.

[42]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[43]  Jacob Jacoby,et al.  Consumer Research: How valid and useful are all our consumer behavior research findings? , 1978 .

[44]  J. Jacoby.  Consumer Research: A State of the Art Review , 1978 .

[45]  L. H. Peters,et al.  Some Observations on Wording of Item-Stems for Attitude Questionnaires , 1974 .

[46]  Marvin A. Jolson,et al.  Statement Polarity in Attitude Studies , 1974 .

[47]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Category ratings as "subjective expected values": Implications for attitude formation and change. , 1973 .

[48]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[49]  M. Birnbaum.  Morality judgments: tests of an averaging model. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  S. Feldman,et al.  Motivational Aspects of Attitudinal Elements and Their Place in Cognitive Interaction , 1966 .

[51]  N. Anderson.  Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[52]  N. Anderson.  PRIMACY EFFECTS IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION FORMATION USING A GENERALIZED ORDER EFFECT PARADIGM. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  L. G. Rorer,et al.  THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  Nehemiah Jordan,et al.  THE “ASYMMETRY” OF “LIKING” AND “DISLIKING”: A PHENOMENON MERITING FURTHER REFLECTION AND RESEARCH , 1965 .

[55]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[56]  H. Helson,et al.  Adaptation-level theory , 1964 .

[57]  Allen L. Edwards,et al.  Techniques Of Attitude Scale Construction , 1958 .

[58]  B. Bass.  Authoritarianism or acquiescence? , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.