Psychosocial and Ethical Aspects in Non-Invasive EEG-Based BCI Research—A Survey Among BCI Users and BCI Professionals

[1]  B. Allison,et al.  The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders’ Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2011, Neuroethics.

[2]  Jane E Huggins,et al.  Barriers to and mediators of brain–computer interface user acceptance: focus group findings , 2012, Ergonomics.

[3]  Gerd Grübler,et al.  Beyond the responsibility gap. Discussion note on responsibility and liability in the use of brain-computer interfaces , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[4]  J. Huggins,et al.  What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2011, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases.

[5]  E. Hildt.  Brain-Computer Interaction and Medical Access to the Brain: Individual, Social and Ethical Implications , 2011 .

[6]  Martin Maguire,et al.  User-Centred Requirements Handbook , 2010 .

[7]  Jeremy Hill,et al.  A note on ethical aspects of BCI , 2009, Neural Networks.

[8]  Tadayoshi Kohno,et al.  Neurosecurity: security and privacy for neural devices. , 2009, Neurosurgical focus.

[9]  G. Tamburrini.  Brain to Computer Communication: Ethical Perspectives on Interaction Models , 2009 .

[10]  B. Dobkin.  Brain–computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  Guglielmo Tamburrini,et al.  Ethical monitoring of brain-machine interfaces , 2007, AI & SOCIETY.

[12]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[13]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[14]  John R. Williams.  DECLARATION OF HELSINKI , 1964 .