Predicting long‐term carbon sequestration in response to CO2 enrichment: How and why do current ecosystem models differ?

Large uncertainty exists in model projections of the land carbon (C) sink response to increasing atmospheric CO2. Free‐Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments lasting a decade or more have investigated ecosystem responses to a step change in atmospheric CO2 concentration. To interpret FACE results in the context of gradual increases in atmospheric CO2 over decades to centuries, we used a suite of seven models to simulate the Duke and Oak Ridge FACE experiments extended for 300 years of CO2 enrichment. We also determine key modeling assumptions that drive divergent projections of terrestrial C uptake and evaluate whether these assumptions can be constrained by experimental evidence. All models simulated increased terrestrial C pools resulting from CO2 enrichment, though there was substantial variability in quasi‐equilibrium C sequestration and rates of change. In two of two models that assume that plant nitrogen (N) uptake is solely a function of soil N supply, the net primary production response to elevated CO2 became progressively N limited. In four of five models that assume that N uptake is a function of both soil N supply and plant N demand, elevated CO2 led to reduced ecosystem N losses and thus progressively relaxed nitrogen limitation. Many allocation assumptions resulted in increased wood allocation relative to leaves and roots which reduced the vegetation turnover rate and increased C sequestration. In addition, self‐thinning assumptions had a substantial impact on C sequestration in two models. Accurate representation of N process dynamics (in particular N uptake), allocation, and forest self‐thinning is key to minimizing uncertainty in projections of future C sequestration in response to elevated atmospheric CO2.

[1]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Nitrogen Availability Reduces CMIP5 Projections of Twenty-First-Century Land Carbon Uptake* , 2015 .

[2]  A. Finzi,et al.  Are above- and below-ground phenology in sync? , 2015, The New phytologist.

[3]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Where does the carbon go? A model–data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites , 2014, The New phytologist.

[4]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Faster Decomposition Under Increased Atmospheric CO2 Limits Soil Carbon Storage , 2014, Science.

[5]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Comprehensive ecosystem model‐data synthesis using multiple data sets at two temperate forest free‐air CO2 enrichment experiments: Model performance at ambient CO2 concentration , 2014 .

[6]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO2 Enrichment studies , 2014, The New phytologist.

[7]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks , 2014 .

[8]  F. Woodward,et al.  Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2 , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model , 2013 .

[10]  S. Gerber,et al.  Land use change and nitrogen feedbacks constrain the trajectory of the land carbon sink , 2013 .

[11]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Evaluating theories of drought-induced vegetation mortality using a multimodel-experiment framework. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[12]  P. Cox,et al.  Evaluating the Land and Ocean Components of the Global Carbon Cycle in the CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2013 .

[13]  S. Reed,et al.  Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Jianyang Xia,et al.  Traceable components of terrestrial carbon storage capacity in biogeochemical models , 2013, Global change biology.

[15]  R. Q. Thomas,et al.  Insights into mechanisms governing forest carbon response to nitrogen deposition: A model–data comparison using observed responses to nitrogen addition , 2013 .

[16]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Forest water use and water use efficiency at elevated CO2: a model‐data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites , 2013, Global change biology.

[17]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters , 2013 .

[18]  R. Q. Thomas,et al.  Recovery from disturbance requires resynchronization of ecosystem nutrient cycles. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[19]  N. McDowell,et al.  Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration: from the geological past to the next century. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[20]  G. Kowalchuk,et al.  Impacts of 3 years of elevated atmospheric CO2 on rhizosphere carbon flow and microbial community dynamics , 2013, Global change biology.

[21]  K.,et al.  Carbon–Concentration and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2012 .

[22]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Basin-wide variations in Amazon forest structure and function are mediated by both soils and climate , 2012 .

[23]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Modeling carbon allocation in trees: a search for principles. , 2012, Tree physiology.

[24]  Chunjian Li,et al.  Maize cob plus husks mimics the grain sink to stimulate nutrient uptake by roots , 2012 .

[25]  E. Kiers,et al.  Carbon availability triggers fungal nitrogen uptake and transport in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  K. Pregitzer,et al.  Forest productivity under elevated CO₂ and O₃: positive feedbacks to soil N cycling sustain decade-long net primary productivity enhancement by CO₂. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[27]  Q. Zhang,et al.  Limitations of nitrogen and phosphorous on the terrestrial carbon uptake in the 20th century , 2011 .

[28]  Mark West,et al.  C4 grasses prosper as carbon dioxide eliminates desiccation in warmed semi-arid grassland , 2011, Nature.

[29]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[30]  Paolo De Angelis,et al.  Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance , 2011 .

[31]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO₂. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[32]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Diagnosing errors in a land surface model (CABLE) in the time and frequency domains , 2011 .

[33]  C. Bigler,et al.  Will the CO2 fertilization effect in forests be offset by reduced tree longevity? , 2011, Oecologia.

[34]  P. Ciais,et al.  Mortality as a key driver of the spatial distribution of aboveground biomass in Amazonian forest: results from a dynamic vegetation model , 2010 .

[35]  R. T. Belote,et al.  CO2 enrichment accelerates successional development of an understory plant community , 2010 .

[36]  Andrew D. Friend,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O‐CN land surface model: 1. Model description, site‐scale evaluation, and sensitivity to parameter estimates , 2010 .

[37]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O‐CN land surface model: 2. Role of the nitrogen cycle in the historical terrestrial carbon balance , 2010 .

[38]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: A mechanistic, globally applicable model of plant nitrogen uptake, retranslocation, and fixation , 2010 .

[39]  R. Ruess,et al.  Cross-Ecosystem Comparisons of In Situ Plant Uptake of Amino Acid-N and NH4+ , 2010, Ecosystems.

[40]  Benjamin Z. Houlton,et al.  Nitrogen constraints on terrestrial carbon uptake: Implications for the global carbon‐climate feedback , 2009 .

[41]  Rachel M. Law,et al.  A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere , 2009 .

[42]  R. McMurtrie,et al.  CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  C. Field,et al.  A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere , 2008, Nature.

[44]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability , 2007 .

[45]  K. Pregitzer,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 and O3 alter the flow of 15N in developing forest ecosystems. , 2007, Ecology.

[46]  O. Phillips,et al.  The global relationship between forest productivity and biomass , 2007 .

[47]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Increases in nitrogen uptake rather than nitrogen-use efficiency support higher rates of temperate forest productivity under elevated CO2 , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Shuijin Hu,et al.  Plant nitrogen acquisition and interactions under elevated carbon dioxide: impact of endophytes and mycorrhizae , 2007 .

[49]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  W. Parton,et al.  Progressive Nitrogen Limitation of Ecosystem Responses to Rising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide , 2004 .

[51]  F. Woodward,et al.  Vegetation dynamics – simulating responses to climatic change , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[52]  Paul Dijkstra,et al.  CO2 Elicits Long-Term Decline in Nitrogen Fixation , 2004, Science.

[53]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Nitrogen and Climate Change , 2003, Science.

[54]  N. Grimm,et al.  Towards an ecological understanding of biological nitrogen fixation , 2002 .

[55]  L. Hedin,et al.  Nitrogen loss from unpolluted South American forests mainly via dissolved organic compounds , 2002, Nature.

[56]  R. Norby,et al.  Allometric determination of tree growth in a CO2‐enriched sweetgum stand , 2001 .

[57]  R. Dewar,et al.  Soil processes dominate the long-term response of forest net primary productivity to increased temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration. , 2000 .

[58]  P. Friedlingstein,et al.  Toward an allocation scheme for global terrestrial carbon models , 1999 .

[59]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  VALIDITY OF EXTRAPOLATING FIELD CO2 EXPERIMENTS TO PREDICT CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1999 .

[60]  W. Parton,et al.  DAYCENT and its land surface submodel: description and testing , 1998 .

[61]  D. A. King,et al.  Modelling forest‐growth response to increasing CO2 concentration in relation to various factors affecting nutrient supply , 1998 .

[62]  Edward B. Rastetter,et al.  RESPONSES OF N‐LIMITED ECOSYSTEMS TO INCREASED CO2: A BALANCED‐NUTRITION, COUPLED‐ELEMENT‐CYCLES MODEL , 1997 .

[63]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model , 1995 .

[64]  Juan J. Armesto,et al.  Patterns of Nutrient Loss from Unpolluted, Old‐Growth Temperate Forests: Evaluation of Biogeochemical Theory , 1995 .

[65]  R. McMurtrie,et al.  Long-Term Response of Nutrient-Limited Forests to CO"2 Enrichment; Equilibrium Behavior of Plant-Soil Models. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[66]  E. B. Rastetter,et al.  Changes in C storage by terrestrial ecosystems: How C-N interactions restrict responses to CO2 and temperature , 1992 .

[67]  M. Stitt Rising Co2 Levels and Their Potential Significance for Carbon Flow in Photosynthetic Cells , 1991 .

[68]  W. Arp Effects of source‐sink relations on photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 , 1991 .

[69]  W. Parton,et al.  Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands , 1987 .

[70]  J. Turner Nutrient Cycling in an Age Sequence of Western Washington Douglas-fir Stands , 1981 .

[71]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[72]  J. Olson,et al.  Energy Storage and the Balance of Producers and Decomposers in Ecological Systems , 1963 .

[73]  Anthony P. Walker,et al.  Phase 1 Free Air CO2 Enrichment Model-Data Synthesis (FACE-MDS): Meteorological Data , 2015 .

[74]  Charles T. Garten,et al.  Litterfall 15N abundance indicates declining soil nitrogen availability in a free-air CO2 enrichment experiment. , 2011, Ecology.

[75]  Charles W. Cook,et al.  Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO(2) enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO(2)] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[76]  J. Randerson,et al.  Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM) , 2010 .

[77]  Dale W. Johnson Progressive N limitation in forests: review and implications for long-term responses to elevated CO2. , 2006, Ecology.

[78]  R. Norby,et al.  Nitrogen uptake, distribution, turnover, and efficiency of use in a CO2-enriched sweetgum forest. , 2006, Ecology.

[79]  P. Ciais,et al.  Archived Version from Ncdocks Institutional Repository a Synthesis of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Fossil-fuel Combustion Title: a Synthesis of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Fossil-fuel Combustion a Synthesis of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Fossil-fuel Combustion , 2022 .

[80]  S S I T C H,et al.  Evaluation of Ecosystem Dynamics, Plant Geography and Terrestrial Carbon Cycling in the Lpj Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2022 .