Which risk scenarios can drive the emergence of costly cooperation?

In collective risk dilemmas, cooperation prevents collective loss only when players contribute sufficiently. In these more complex variants of a social dilemma, the form of the risk curve is crucial and can strongly affect the feasibility of a cooperative outcome. The risk typically depends on the sum of all individual contributions. Here, we introduce a general approach to analyze the stabilization of cooperation under any decreasing risk curve and discuss how different risk curves affect cooperative outcomes. We show that the corresponding solutions can be reached by social learning or evolutionary dynamics. Furthermore, we extend our analysis to cases where individuals do not only care about their expected payoff, but also about the associated distribution of payoffs. This approach is an essential step to understand the effects of risk decay on cooperation.

[1]  C. Hauert,et al.  Intra- and intergenerational discounting in the climate game , 2013 .

[2]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Cooperation and control in multiplayer social dilemmas , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Kenneth S. Chan,et al.  Heterogeneity and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods , 1999 .

[4]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Under high stakes and uncertainty the rich should lend the poor a helping hand. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  M. V. Levati,et al.  Leading by Example in a Public Goods Experiment with Heterogeneity and Incomplete Information , 2007 .

[6]  T. Yamagishi The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good , 1986 .

[7]  J. Quiggin Generalized expected utility theory : the rank-dependent model , 1994 .

[8]  S. Kurokawa,et al.  Emergence of cooperation in public goods games , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Leaders should not be conformists in evolutionary social dilemmas , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Risk-driven migration and the collective-risk social dilemma , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[12]  Bettina Rockenbach,et al.  The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment , 2006, Nature.

[13]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[14]  J. Quiggin A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[15]  Friedrich Burkhard von der Osten,et al.  Sustainability is possible despite greed - Exploring the nexus between profitability and sustainability in common pool resource systems , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[16]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[17]  Long Wang,et al.  Effects of heterogeneous wealth distribution on public cooperation with collective risk. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Francisco C. Santos,et al.  A bottom-up institutional approach to cooperative governance of risky commons , 2013 .

[19]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Democratic decisions establish stable authorities that overcome the paradox of second-order punishment , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary game dynamics in a Wright-Fisher process , 2006, Journal of mathematical biology.

[21]  R. Mould Experimental Test , 2008, 0801.1263.

[22]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Analytical Results for Individual and Group Selection of Any Intensity , 2008, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[23]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Climate policies under wealth inequality , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  N. Raihani,et al.  Uncertainty, rationality and cooperation in the context of climate change , 2011 .

[25]  D. Bernoulli Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk , 1954 .

[26]  Nikolaos Georgantzís,et al.  Accounting for risk aversion in repeated prisoners’ dilemma games: an experimental test , 2002 .

[27]  J. Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Resource heterogeneity leads to unjust effort distribution in climate change mitigation , 2017, PloS one.

[28]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Risk of collective failure provides an escape from the tragedy of the commons , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Emergence of responsible sanctions without second order free riders, antisocial punishment or spite , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[30]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[31]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Averting group failures in collective-risk social dilemmas , 2012, ArXiv.

[32]  H. Gordon,et al.  The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery , 1954, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  R. May,et al.  Combined inequality in wealth and risk leads to disaster in the climate change game , 2013, Climatic Change.

[34]  Chris Snijders Effects of risk preferences in social dilemmas: A game-theoretical analysis and evidence from two experiments , 2003 .

[35]  J. Ledyard Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research , 1994 .

[36]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[37]  Werner Raub,et al.  Gains, losses, and cooperation in social dilemmas and collective action: The effects of risk preferences , 1997 .

[38]  Toshio Yamagishi,et al.  Seriousness of Social Dilemmas and the Provision of a Sanctioning System , 1988 .

[39]  Alessandro Tavoni,et al.  Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  C. Hauert,et al.  Via Freedom to Coercion: The Emergence of Costly Punishment , 2007, Science.

[41]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Evolutionary Dynamics of Strategic Behavior in a Collective-Risk Dilemma , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  Torsten Röhl,et al.  Cooperative interaction of rich and poor can be catalyzed by intermediate climate targets , 2011 .

[43]  Alexander Strashny Asymmetric loss utility: an analysis of decision under risk , 2004 .

[44]  Charles O. Kile,et al.  An Experimental Test , 2016 .

[45]  Jochem Marotzke,et al.  The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[47]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[48]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of altruistic punishment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[50]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  The Evolution of Strategic Timing in Collective-Risk Dilemmas , 2013, PloS one.

[51]  David G. Rand,et al.  Cooperating with the future , 2014, Nature.