A comparison of two lifting assessment approaches in patients with chronic low back pain

The Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE) and the lifting test of the WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation (WWS) are well known as lifting performance tests. The objective of this study was to study whether the PILE and the WWS can be used interchangeably in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and to explore whether psychosocial variables can explain possible differences. Methods: 53 Patients (32 men and 21 women) with CLBP were tested twice in a counter balanced design. Pearson Correlation Coefficient of r > 0.75 and non-significant differences on two-tailed t tests were considered as good comparability. Results: Pearson Correlation Coefficient was 0.75 (p < 0.01). Lifting performance on the WWS was a mean of 6.0 kg higher compared to the PILE (p < 0.01). The difference between the PILE and the WWS was unrelated to psychological variables. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the PILE and the WWS cannot be used interchangeably. Psychosocial variables cannot explain the differences between both tests.

[1]  M. Robinson,et al.  Psychosocial Factors and Functional Capacity Evaluation Among Persons with Chronic Pain , 2003, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[2]  S. M. Jaegers,et al.  Short-term outcomes of a back school program for chronic low back pain. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Susan J. Isernhagen,et al.  Work injury : management and prevention , 1991 .

[4]  W. A. Arrindell,et al.  SCL-90. Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator , 2003 .

[5]  J. Groothoff,et al.  Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: intra class correlation and limits of agreement , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[6]  A Mital,et al.  Psychophysical Capacity Modeling in Frequent Manual Materials Handling Activities , 1988, Human factors.

[7]  N. Vøllestad,et al.  Fear-avoidance beliefs and distress in relation to disability in acute and chronic low back pain , 2004, Pain.

[8]  G. Waddell,et al.  A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability , 1993, Pain.

[9]  S. Isernhagen.  Functional capacity evaluation: Rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach , 1992, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[10]  S. Isernhagen.  The comprehensive guide to work injury management , 1995 .

[11]  P. Onghena,et al.  Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance , 1995, Pain.

[12]  A. Verbeek,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia and the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire in acute low back pain. , 2003, Manual therapy.

[13]  M. Pfingsten,et al.  Fear-avoidance behavior and anticipation of pain in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled study. , 2001, Pain medicine.

[14]  P. Onghena,et al.  Fear of Movement/(Re)injury in Chronic Low Back Pain: Education or Exposure In Vivo as Mediator to Fear Reduction? , 2005, The Clinical journal of pain.

[15]  Material handling performance of patients with chronic low back pain during Functional Capacity Evaluation: A comparison between three countries , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[16]  T. Hansson,et al.  Predictors for work ability and disability in men and women with low-back or neck problems , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[17]  Rolf Moe-Nilssen,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of the Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE) , 2005, Spine.

[18]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[19]  M. Roland,et al.  The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. , 2000, Spine.

[20]  T. Mayer,et al.  Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation: II. A Comparison with Isokinetic Lifting in a Disabled Chronic Low-Back Pain Industrial Population , 1988, Spine.

[21]  M. Reneman,et al.  Upper Lifting Performance of Healthy Young Adults in Functional Capacity Evaluations: A Comparison of Two Protocols , 2003, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[22]  Geert Crombez,et al.  Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability , 1999, Pain.

[23]  T. Mayer,et al.  Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation: I. A Standardized Protocol and Normative Database , 1988, Spine.

[24]  Douglas P Gross,et al.  Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[25]  Leon Straker,et al.  Validity of work-related assessments. , 1999, Work.

[26]  P. Dijkstra,et al.  Test–Retest Reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain , 2003, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[27]  W Karwowski,et al.  Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting. , 1992, Ergonomics.