Stochastic Resonance in Time-to-Contact Judgments

Stochastic resonance (SR) is a counterintuitive phenomenon in which additive noise enhances performance of a nonlinear system. Previous studies demonstrated SR effect on human tactile sensitivity by adding noise of same modality and cross modality. Similarly, enhancement of human hearing through additive noise has been studied. In this study, we investigate the effect of noise in visual perception, specifically time-to-contact (TTC) judgments. This study explores four research questions: (1) Does noise help in TTC judgments? (2) How does noise affect speed and accuracy of TTC judgments? (3) Does cross modal noise help in TTC judgments? (4) How does cross modal noise affect speed and accuracy of TTC judgments? Through simulation, we show that noise in optical cue can enhance weak signals. We also demonstrate that noise can improve speed of TTC judgments at the expense of accuracy. Similarly, we demonstrate SR by adding noise of cross modality. These findings provide plausible hypotheses regarding how much noise should be added to enhance TTC judgments.

[1]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Theory of the Stochastic Resonance Effect in Signal Detection—Part II: Variable Detectors , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  George A. Geri,et al.  Simulating time-to-contact when both target and observer are in motion , 2010, Displays.

[3]  Michael W. Haas,et al.  Human-machine haptic interface design using stochastic resonance methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[4]  Scott A. Beardsley,et al.  Different motion cues are used to estimate time-to-arrival for frontoparallel and looming trajectories , 2011, Vision Research.

[5]  Myron L. Braunstein,et al.  Depth perception through motion , 1976 .

[6]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Human hearing enhanced by noise 1 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 23 May 2000. , 2000, Brain Research.

[7]  David N. Lee,et al.  Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics , 1981, Nature.

[8]  H. Wagner.  Flow-field variables trigger landing in flies , 1982, Nature.

[9]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Aperiodic stochastic resonance. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[10]  Lawrence M. Ward.  PSYCHOPHYSICS OF STOCHASTIC RESONANCE , 2004 .

[11]  Patricia R. DeLucia.  Pictorial depth cues and motion-produced information for depth perception. , 1990 .

[12]  Scott M. Dittman,et al.  Monocular optical constraints on collision control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Stochastic resonance in noisy threshold neurons , 2003, Neural Networks.

[14]  Reinhold Necker,et al.  Head-bobbing of walking birds , 2007, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  P. R. Green,et al.  Optic flow-field variables trigger landing in hawk but not in pigeons , 1990, Naturwissenschaften.

[16]  J. Collins,et al.  Noise-enhanced human sensorimotor function , 2003, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[17]  L M Ward,et al.  Statistical analysis of stochastic resonance in a simple setting. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[18]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[20]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Robust stochastic resonance for simple threshold neurons. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Frank Moss,et al.  Use of behavioural stochastic resonance by paddle fish for feeding , 1999, Nature.

[22]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Soft threshold stochastic resonance. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  Chapter 1 Theories of time-to-contact judgment , 2004 .

[24]  Frank Moss,et al.  Noise enhancement of information transfer in crayfish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance , 1993, Nature.

[25]  J. Tresilian.  Perceptual Information for the Timing of Interceptive Action , 1990, Perception.

[26]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[27]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. , 1990 .

[28]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Estimating the time-to-passage of visual self-motion: Is the second order motion information processed? , 2010, Vision Research.

[29]  Patricia R. DeLucia,et al.  Chapter 11 Multiple sources of information influence time-to-contact judgments: Do heuristics accommodate limits in sensory and cognitive processes? , 2004 .

[30]  Massimo Riani,et al.  Visual Perception of Stochastic Resonance , 1997 .

[31]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Aperiodic stochastic resonance in excitable systems. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[32]  Jason W. Fleischer,et al.  Nonlinear self-filtering of noisy images via dynamical stochastic resonance , 2010 .

[33]  S. Kay,et al.  Can detectability be improved by adding noise? , 2000, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[34]  S. Fauve,et al.  Stochastic resonance in a bistable system , 1983 .

[35]  J E Cutting,et al.  Heading judgments in minimal environments: The value of a heuristic when invariants are rare , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  G. Parisi,et al.  Stochastic resonance in climatic change , 1982 .