Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: an empirical investigation of the US Best Corporate Citizens

The aim of the paper is to investigate the relationship between board reputation and corporate social performance. Specifically, we claim that corporate social performance may be a function of board attributes and we investigate the association between board reputation – in terms of board composition, competence, diversity, leadership, structure and links with the external environment – and the social performance of firms, after controlling for other company-specific characteristics. In order to explore such a relationship, we analyse the association between corporate social performance and board reputation of the Business Ethics 100 Best Corporate Citizens over the period 2005–2007. Data on corporate social responsibility are collected from the KLD's SOCRATES database, which is derived from multiple sources and is not dependent upon corporate self-reporting. Data on board reputation are hand-collected from corporate reports and proxy statements. Our empirical evidence shows that the proportions of independent, community influential and female directors are positively associated with corporate social performance, while the presence of a corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee is positively associated with community performance. In contrast, we find that CEO duality and community influential directors with multiple directorships have a negative effect on corporate social performance.

[1]  Michel Magnan,et al.  Is Environmental Governance Substantive or Symbolic? An Empirical Investigation , 2012, Journal of Business Ethics.

[2]  Davide Raggi,et al.  Monitoring Intensity and Stakeholders’ Orientation: How Does Governance Affect Social and Environmental Disclosure? , 2012, Journal of Business Ethics.

[3]  M. Huse,et al.  The Contribution of Women on Boards of Directors: Going Beyond the Surface , 2010 .

[4]  Renée B. Adams,et al.  Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance , 2008 .

[5]  N. Brennan,et al.  Corporate Governance, Accountability and Mechanisms of Accountability: An Overview , 2008 .

[6]  A. Riccaboni,et al.  The effects of board size and ‘busy’ directors on the market value of Italian companies , 2008 .

[7]  Charles H. Cho,et al.  The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note , 2007 .

[8]  Juan Manuel de la Fuente-Sabaté,et al.  Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Reputation: Two Interwoven Perspectives , 2007 .

[9]  G. Markarian,et al.  Firm Complexity and Board of Director Composition , 2007 .

[10]  N. Demise,et al.  OECD Principles of Corporate Governance , 2006 .

[11]  Robin W. Roberts,et al.  Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure , 2006 .

[12]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and the Us , 2006 .

[13]  Terence Cooke,et al.  The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting , 2005 .

[14]  Chris Brooks,et al.  Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures , 2005 .

[15]  Philip Stiles,et al.  Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the Non-Executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom , 2005 .

[16]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  An Examination of Differences between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation , 2005 .

[17]  Jeffrey Unerman,et al.  Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? , 2004 .

[18]  E. Webb,et al.  An Examination of Socially Responsible Firms' Board Structure , 2004 .

[19]  Morten Huse,et al.  Renewing Management and Governance: New Paradigms of Governance? , 2003 .

[20]  A. Hillman,et al.  Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives , 2003 .

[21]  M. V. van Engen,et al.  Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Sulaiman A. Al-Tuwaijri,et al.  The Relations Among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance, and Economic Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach , 2003 .

[23]  Amy J. Hillman,et al.  Women and Racial Minorities in the Boardroom: How Do Directors Differ? , 2002 .

[24]  George I. Kassinis,et al.  Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation , 2002 .

[25]  L. Preston,et al.  Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth , 2002 .

[26]  A. Hillman,et al.  Board Composition and Stakeholder Performance: Do Stakeholder Directors Make a Difference? , 2001 .

[27]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Strategic Context Of External Network Ties: Examining The Impact Of Director Appointments On Board Involvement In Strategic Decision Making , 2001 .

[28]  Peter J. DaDalt,et al.  Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Roles of the Board and the Audit Committee , 2001 .

[29]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  Wealth and the effects of founder management among IPO‐stage new ventures , 2001 .

[30]  A. Hillman,et al.  Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? , 2001 .

[31]  Bryan W. Husted,et al.  Is it ethical to use ethics as strategy , 2000 .

[32]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? , 2000 .

[33]  Ramona L. Paetzold,et al.  The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change , 2000 .

[34]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource-Based Theories , 1999 .

[35]  Patrice Luoma,et al.  Research Notes. Stakeholders and Corporate Boards: Institutional Influences on Board Composition and Structure , 1999 .

[36]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance , 1999 .

[37]  James D. Westphal.  Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties , 1999 .

[38]  C. Deegan,et al.  The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory , 1998 .

[39]  B. Coffey,et al.  Board Diversity and Managerial Control as Predictors of Corporate Social Performance , 1998 .

[40]  Hussein A. Warsame,et al.  Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports , 1998 .

[41]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  The corporate social performance-financial performance link , 1997 .

[42]  Julie Siciliano,et al.  The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance , 1996 .

[43]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[44]  D. P. Baron,et al.  Integrated Strategy: Market and Nonmarket Components , 1995 .

[45]  H. Rao.  The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912 , 1994 .

[46]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  CEO Duality as a Double-Edged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command , 1994 .

[47]  Lawrence Gales,et al.  An analysis of board of director size and composition in bankrupt organizations , 1994 .

[48]  Kimberly D. Elsbach.  MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMACY IN THE CALIFORNIA CATTLE INDUSTRY - THE CONSTRUCTION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF VERBAL ACCOUNTS , 1994 .

[49]  M. C. Jensen.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance.

[50]  M. R. Mathews,et al.  Socially Responsible Accounting , 1993 .

[51]  Jay W. Lorsch,et al.  A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance , 1992 .

[52]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models (3rd ed.). , 1992 .

[53]  J. Forker,et al.  Corporate Governance and Disclosure Quality , 1992 .

[54]  H. Dudley Dewhirst,et al.  Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation , 1992 .

[55]  D. Wood.  Corporate Social Performance Revisited , 1991 .

[56]  A. Carroll.  The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[57]  W. Boeker,et al.  Turbulence at the top: a new perspective on governance structure changes and strategic change. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[58]  Jay W. Lorsch,et al.  Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards , 1989 .

[59]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model , 1989 .

[60]  I. Kesner,et al.  Directors' Characteristics and Committee Membership: An Investigation of Type, Occupation, Tenure, and Gender , 1988 .

[61]  Asghar Zardkoohi,et al.  Technology, Residual Claimants, and Corporate Control , 1986 .

[62]  James C. Worthy,et al.  Emerging Issues in Corporate Governance. , 1986 .

[63]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Corporate Community Involvement in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1986 .

[64]  Philip L. Cochran,et al.  The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model , 1985 .

[65]  Arieh A. Ullmann.  Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms , 1985 .

[66]  J. Meindl,et al.  Corporate attributions as strategic illusions of management control. , 1984 .

[67]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[68]  F. Schoorman,et al.  A Limited Rationality Model of Interlocking Directorates. , 1983 .

[69]  K. Provan,et al.  Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies. , 1980, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[70]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[71]  H. Reitz.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[72]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[73]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[74]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy , 1975 .

[75]  J. Pfeffer.  Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment , 1972 .

[76]  Shorey Peterson,et al.  The Modern Corporation and Private Property. , 1933 .

[77]  Lu Li.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance Correlation , 2011 .

[78]  D. Whittaker,et al.  Re‐embedding the Corporation? Comparative perspectives on corporate governance, employment relations and corporate social responsibility , 2007 .

[79]  Юрий Евгеньевич Благов.  БИЗНЕС И ОБЩЕСТВО: НОВАЯ ПАРАДИГМА ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ Рецензия на книгу: Post J. E., Preston L. E., Sachs S. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford, 2002 , 2003 .

[80]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[81]  Diana Bilimoria.  Building the Business Case for Women Corporate Directors , 2000 .

[82]  A. Hillman,et al.  Corporate political strategies and firm performance: indications of firm‐specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government , 1999 .

[83]  Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.  OECD Principles of Corporate Governance , 1999 .

[84]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Reputational Rankings: Institutionalizing Social Audits of Corporate Performance , 1994 .

[85]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[86]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis , 1987 .

[87]  J. Hooley.  Data in Search of a Theory. , 1986 .

[88]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[89]  Thomas H. Koenig,et al.  Interlocking Corporate Directorships as a Social Network , 1981 .

[90]  L. Preston,et al.  Corporate social accounting reporting for the physical environment: A critical review and implementation proposal , 1977 .

[91]  Philip Selznick.  TVA and the grass roots , 1949 .

[92]  A. Hillman,et al.  Strategic Management Journal Research Notes and Commentaries Investor Activism, Managerial Responsiveness, and Corporate Social Performance , 2022 .