The effects of hands-on and teacher demonstration laboratory methods on science achievement in relation to reasoning ability and prior knowledge

The present study compared the relative effects of hands-on and teacher demonstration laboratory methods on declarative knowledge (factual and conceptual) and procedural knowledge (problem-solving) achievement. Of particular interest were (a) whether these relationships vary as a function of reasoning ability and (b) whether prior knowledge and reasoning ability predict student achievement. Ninth-grade physical science students were randomly assigned to classes taught by either a hands-on or a teacher demonstration laboratory method. Students' reasoning ability and prior knowledge of science were assessed prior to the instruction. The two instructional methods resulted in equal declarative knowledge achievement. However, students in the hands-on laboratory class performed significantly better on the procedural knowledge test than did students in the teacher demonstration class. These results were unrelated to reasoning ability. Prior knowledge significantly predicted performance on the declarative knowledge test. Both reasoning ability and prior knowledge significantly predicted performance on the procedural knowledge test, with reasoning ability being the stronger predictor.

[1]  A. Lawson Predicting science achievement: The role of developmental level, disembedding ability, mental capacity, prior knowledge, and beliefs , 1983 .

[2]  George Greisen Mallinson,et al.  The individual laboratory method compared with the lecture-demonstration method in teaching general biology , 1947 .

[3]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning , 1964 .

[4]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Position papers: The reception learning paradigm , 1979 .

[5]  Colin Harrison,et al.  The Four-card Problem and the Generality of Formal Reasoning , 1972 .

[6]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Is it formal if it's not physics? (the influence of content on formal reasoning) , 1983 .

[7]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[8]  A. Lawson The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction , 1982 .

[9]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Theoretical and practical significance of formal reasoning , 1982 .

[10]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth Of Logical Thinking From Childhood To Adolescence: An Essay On The Construction Of Formal Operational Structures , 1958 .

[11]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Configural Effects in Human Memory: The Superiority of Memory over External Information Sources as a Basis for Inference Verification , 1979 .

[12]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  A Review of Research on Formal Reasoning and Science Teaching. , 1985 .

[13]  Suzanne Martorano A developmental analysis of performance on Piaget's formal operations tasks. , 1977 .

[14]  E. Yalow Educational psychology: A cognitive view. 2nd ed. , 1978 .

[15]  A. Howe,et al.  Using concrete materials and peer interaction to enhance learning in chemistry , 1982 .

[16]  Robert Karplus,et al.  Science teaching and the development of reasoning , 1977 .

[17]  F. Reif,et al.  Effects of Knowledge Organization on Task Performance , 1984 .

[18]  R. Yager,et al.  Effects of the laboratory and demonstration methods upon the outcomes of instruction in secondary biology , 1969 .

[19]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  The Effect of Student Manipulation of Molecular Models on Chemistry achievement According to Piagetian Level. , 1980 .

[20]  A. Howe,et al.  The use of concrete methods in secondary chemistry instruction , 1978 .

[21]  Robert Karplus,et al.  The acquisition of propositional logic and formal operational schemata during the secondary school years , 1978 .

[22]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  The Development and Validation of a Group Test of Logical Thinking , 1981 .

[23]  Joseph I. Lipson,et al.  Twenty questions about student errors , 1986 .

[24]  J. Flavell The Developmental psychology of Jean Piaget , 1963 .