The Role of Inertial Sensitivity in Motor Planning

To achieve a given motor task a single trajectory must be chosen from the infinite set of possibilities consistent with the task. To investigate such motor planning in a natural environment, we examined the kinematics of reaching movements made around a visual obstacle in three-dimensional space. Within each session, the start and end points of the movement were uniformly varied around the obstacle. However, the distribution of the near points, where the paths came closest to the obstacle, showed a strong anisotropy, clustering at the poles of a preferred axis through the center of the obstacle. The preferred axes for movements made with the left and right arms were mirror symmetric about the midsagittal plane, suggesting that the anisotropy stems from intrinsic properties of the arm rather than extrinsic visual factors. One account of these results is a sensitivity model of motor planning, in which the movement path is skewed so that when the hand passes closest to the obstacle, the arm is in a configuration that is least sensitive to perturbations that might cause collision. To test this idea, we measured the mobility ellipse of the arm. The mobility minor axis represents the direction in which the hand is most inertially stable to a force perturbation. In agreement with the sensitivity model, the mobility minor axis was not significantly different from the preferred near point axis. The results suggest that the sensitivity of the arm to perturbations, as determined by its inertial stability, is taken into account in the planning process.

[1]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[2]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  C. Chandler,et al.  Computers, brains and the control of movement , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Flanders,et al.  Interaction between visually and kinesthetically triggered voluntary responses. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  A. Gentile,et al.  Joint control strategies and hand trajectories in multijoint pointing movements. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  宇野 洋二,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement : minimum torque-change model , 1988 .

[10]  P J Cordo,et al.  Kinesthetic and visual control of a bimanual task: specification of direction and amplitude , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Trajectories of Human Multi-Joint Arm Movements: Evidence of Joint Level Planning , 1989, ISER.

[12]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[14]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Lackner,et al.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  M Desmurget,et al.  Postural and synergic control for three-dimensional movements of reaching and grasping. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Philip N. Sabes The planning of visually guided arm movements : feedback perturbation and obstacle avoidance studies , 1996 .

[19]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement , 1996, Science.

[20]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance and a Perturbation Sensitivity Model for Motor Planning , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  M Jeannerod,et al.  Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.