What is IT in a Name? An Empirical Examination of Brand Imitation in Mobile App Market

While millions of users feel pity for the removal of Flappy Bird, many Flappy Bird copycats are flowing into the mobile app stores and even rocket up the top rank charts. In the highly competitive mobile app stores, imitating the names of “superstar” apps is a tactic shared by developers. In this paper, we examine the effects of this strategy – how and to what extent it influences the imitator apps’ downloads. To achieve a better understanding, we also investigate the imitation-related factors that affect the imitators’ downloads. With a dataset from Google Play, we evaluate the research questions with propensity score matching and linear regression. The results suggest that, on average, imitating the names of “superstar” apps brings imitators an improvement in downloads. This positive effect is influenced by the number of “superstar” apps that the imitator’s name looks like, the name similarity level, functional similarity and price difference between the imitator and “superstar” apps. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

[1]  Charles E. Gengler,et al.  The Effects of Brand Name Similarity on Brand Source Confusion: Implications for Trademark Infringement , 2000 .

[2]  Marco Caliendo,et al.  Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  Rik Pieters,et al.  Consumer Evaluation of Copycat Brands: The Effect of Imitation Type , 2012 .

[4]  Vladimir I. Levenshtein,et al.  Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals , 1965 .

[5]  Il-Horn Hann,et al.  Synthesizing Professional and Market Logics: A Study of Independent iOS App Entrepreneurs , 2011, ICIS.

[6]  L. Wood Brands and brand equity: definition and management , 2000 .

[7]  S. Morgan,et al.  Matching Estimators of Causal Effects , 2006 .

[8]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme , 1997 .

[9]  B. Sianesi,et al.  PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing , 2003 .

[10]  Rik Pieters,et al.  When High-Similarity Copycats Lose and Moderate-Similarity Copycats Gain: The Impact of Comparative Evaluation , 2012 .

[11]  Sangaralingam Kajanan,et al.  Takeoff and Sustained Success of Apps in Hypercompetitive Mobile Platform Ecosystems: An Empirical Analysis , 2012, ICIS.

[12]  Camp,et al.  Flappy Bird 早夭的肥鸟 , 2014 .

[13]  Nargis Pervin,et al.  Mobilewalla: A Mobile Application Search Engine , 2011, MobiCASE.

[14]  A. d’Astous,et al.  Consumer evaluations of brand imitations , 2001 .

[15]  B. Loken,et al.  Consumer “Confusion” of Origin and Brand Similarity Perceptions , 1986 .

[16]  Joseph W. Alba,et al.  Sincere Flattery: Trade-Dress Imitation and Consumer Choice , 2004 .

[17]  Octavian Carare,et al.  The Impact of Bestseller Rank on Demand: Evidence from the App Market , 2011 .

[18]  J. Falkinger,et al.  Limited Attention as a Scarce Resource in Information-Rich Economies , 2008 .