Educational transformation to PBL- what has changed

Since 1960 th , PBL(problem based learning) has gradually become one appealing education model in a series of fields like medical education and engineering education. Currently, PBL is being initiated and implemented in various higher education institutions worldwide. The necessity of ensuring a successful and sustainable change to PBL calls for a deep understanding and appreciation of different elements of the change and the relationships between them. The aim of this article is to develop a conceptual framework for the change to PBL by combining current change models, with a special focus on the elements of change. As a theoretical departure, this study begins with presenting the essential principles of PBL which primarily attempts to reconstruct the relationships between discipline and problems to be solved, students and teachers, different individuals, and different disciplines. Four underlying principles can be generalized correspondingly as: problem based learning, student directed learning, social approach, as well as interdisciplinary learning In this paper, the establishment of the theoretical framework for change is primarily inspired by two distinct change models. The first one is the didactic model, mainly dealing with the relationship between different elements of the curriculum in change from a curriculum aspect, whereas the second one focuses on different levels of change. By integrating two models we formulate a framework of change to PBL, focusing on organizational level. Theoretically, a successful change should include four interrelated aspects: curriculum, organizational structure and regulation, infrastructure and resources, and culture. The case of Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia , which is in the transition process from traditional lecture based learning to problem based learning, is discussed in this paper to illustrate the theoretical framework.

[1]  Claire Howell Major,et al.  Foundations of Problem Based Learning , 2004 .

[2]  Egon Moesby,et al.  Reflections on making a change towards Project Oriented and Problem-Based Learning (POPBL) , 2004 .

[3]  Cagil Ozansoy,et al.  Problem Based Learning in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Education , 2009 .

[4]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Implementing PBL and project organized curriculum: A cultural change , 2001 .

[5]  Kay Wilkie,et al.  Challenging Research in Problem Based Learning , 2004 .

[6]  Robert Birnbaum How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership , 1988 .

[7]  E. Graaff,et al.  Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning * , 2022 .

[8]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[9]  Anette Kolmos Facilitating change to a problem-based model , 2002 .

[10]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Diversity of PBL – PBL Learning Principles and Models , 2009 .

[11]  J. Victor Baldridge,et al.  Power and conflict in the university;: Research in the sociology of complex organizations , 1971 .

[12]  R. G. Owens Organizational behavior in education , 1970 .

[13]  K. Weick Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[14]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning , 2003 .

[15]  Elizabeth J. Whitt,et al.  The Invisible Tapestry: Culture in American Colleges and Universities , 1988 .

[16]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning , 2009 .