The Feminist Engineering Classroom: A Vision For Future Educational Interventions

In the quest for the gender equalization of the engineering profession, a variety of strategies are being developed and used in daily engineering education practice. Colleges and universities are recruiting girls and women in increasing numbers into the so-called “engineering pipeline” by using camps, special classes, printed and internet-based advertising, and/or “girl-power” media programming to make engineering’s image more appealing ‐ for example, as fun, socially useful, and multidisciplinary. Concurrently, engineering instructors and faculty are redesigning engineering education using different classroom techniques more congruent with current managerial trends found in industry. These lean towards a focus on group work and interdisciplinarity, which have the added advantage through their political and material reputation as being purportedly more “women-friendly” than traditional methods. These different interventions are crucial in the nation-wide quest to have men and women more proportionately represented in engineering. Arguably, the last bastion is to address the content of engineering courses, which has changed only superficially. This is despite considerable theoretical and practical critiques of science and engineering practice in academia that have been made by feminist researchers and educators. This paper introduces the field of feminist science studies to engineering educators, discusses various explicitly feminist approaches to changing content in engineering, and challenges engineering educators to consider what a “feminist engineering classroom” might consist of with respect to content.

[1]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[2]  Angela B. Ginorio,et al.  FEMINISM, WOMEN'S STUDIES, AND ENGINEERING: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES , 1999 .

[3]  J. Stanley,et al.  Mathematical ability: is sex a factor? , 1981, Science.

[4]  J. Scott Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis , 1986 .

[5]  D. Haraway Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1990 .

[6]  Lisa H. Weasel,et al.  The cell in relation: An ecofeminist revision of cell and molecular biology , 1997 .

[7]  S. Tobias Overcoming Math Anxiety , 1978 .

[8]  Blythe McVicker Clinchy,et al.  Women s ways of knowing: The development of self , 1988 .

[9]  E. Keller Secrets Of Life, Secrets Of Death , 1992 .

[10]  Renata S. Engel,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL VISUALIZATION SKILL TRAINING ON GENDER AND RETENTION IN ENGINEERING , 1998 .

[11]  Nancy Leys Stepan,et al.  Race and Gender: The Role of Analogy in Science , 1986, Isis.

[12]  R. Oldenziel Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women, and Modern Machines in America, 1870-1945 , 2004 .

[13]  S. Turkle Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[14]  Maralee Mayberry,et al.  Reproductive and resistant pedagogies: The comparative roles of collaborative learning and feminist pedagogy in science education , 1998 .

[15]  Melanie J. Guentzel Women as Learners: The Significance of Gender in Adult Learning (review) , 2004 .

[16]  J. Wajcman Feminism Confronts Technology , 1991 .

[17]  Margaret N. Rees,et al.  Feminist Pedagogy, Interdisciplinary Praxis, and Science Education , 1997 .

[18]  J. Butler Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1990 .

[19]  S. Harding Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives , 1993 .

[20]  R. Oldenziel Multiple-entry visas: gender and engineering in the US, 1870–1945 , 2003 .

[21]  B. Lucal,et al.  WHAT IT MEANS TO BE GENDERED ME , 1999 .

[22]  B. Hooks Teaching to transgress : education as the practice of freedom , 1994 .

[23]  E. Rose,et al.  Meeting the Challenge: Innovative Feminist Pedagogies in Action , 1999 .

[24]  M. Belenky,et al.  Women's ways of knowing : the development of self, voice, and mind , 1988 .

[25]  S. Harding The science question in feminism , 1986 .

[26]  A. Fausto-Sterling How to Build a Man , 2000 .

[27]  O. G. S. Crawford,et al.  Said and done , 1955 .

[28]  Patricia Yancey Martin,et al.  “Said and Done” Versus “Saying and Doing” , 2003 .

[29]  M. Kimball A new perspective on women's math achievement. , 1989 .

[30]  J. Stanley,et al.  Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact? , 1980, Science.

[31]  Gongbing Shan,et al.  Anthropometrical data and coefficients of regression related to gender and race. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  Emily Martin,et al.  The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles , 1991, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.