Competitive interactions between artificial lighting and natural cues during seafinding by hatchling marine turtles

Abstract Artificial lighting disrupts the nocturnal orientation of sea turtle hatchlings as they crawl from their nest to the ocean. Laboratory experiments in an arena were used to simultaneously present artificial light (that attracted the turtles toward “land”) and natural cues (a dark silhouette of the dune behind the beach) that promoted “seaward” orientation. Artificial lighting disrupted seaward crawling in the presence of low silhouettes, but not high silhouettes. Low silhouettes provided adequate cues for seaward crawling when the apparent brightness of artificial light was reduced. Based upon these results, we postulate that artificial light disrupts orientation by competing with natural cues. Current restoration practices at nesting beaches emphasize light reduction. However at many sites some lights cannot be modified. Our results suggest that pairing dune restoration (to enhance natural cues) with light reduction (to the extent possible) should significantly improve hatchling orientation, even at nesting beaches where lighting cannot be entirely eliminated.

[1]  M. Salmon,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLES ON AN URBAN BEACH. II: HATCHLING ORIENTATION , 1995 .

[2]  Blair E. Witherington,et al.  Entendiendo, Evaluando y Solucionandolos Problemas de Contaminación de Luz en Playas de Anidamiento de Tortugas Marinas/Understanding, assessing, and resolving light- pollution problems on sea turtle nesting beaches , 2000 .

[3]  N Mrosovsky,et al.  The water-finding ability of sea turtles. Behavioural studies and physiological speculations. , 1972, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[4]  M. Salmon,et al.  Seafinding By Hatchling Sea Turtles: Role of Brightness, Silhouette and Beach Slope as Orientation Cues , 1992 .

[5]  M. Salmon,et al.  Artificial Lighting and Seafinding by Loggerhead Hatchlings: Evidence for Lunar Modulation , 1995 .

[6]  E. H. Bailey INTELLIGENCE FROM AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC STATIONS. , 1884, Science.

[7]  F. J. Verheijen Environmental Features and Orientation , 1982 .

[8]  F. J. Verheijen,et al.  The photic orientation of hatchling sea turtles during water finding behaviour , 1973 .

[9]  N. Mrosovsky Nocturnal Emergence of Hatchling Sea Turtles: Control by Thermal Inhibition of Activity , 1968, Nature.

[10]  J. V. Gorkom,et al.  Optic orientation in hatchlings of the sea turtle, Chelonia mydas. III. Sea‐finding behaviour: The role of photic and visual orientation in animals walking on the spot under laboratory conditions , 1983 .

[11]  F. J. Verheijen The Mechanisms of the Trapping Effect of Artificial Light Sources Upon Animals , 1960 .

[12]  B. Witherington,et al.  BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES OF NESTING SEA TURTLES TO ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING , 1992 .

[13]  N. Mrosovsky,et al.  Wavelength preferences and brightness cues in the water finding behaviour of sea turtles. , 1968, Behaviour.

[14]  M. Salmon,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLES ON AN URBAN BEACH. I: CORRELATES OF NEST PLACEMENT , 1995 .

[15]  G. H. Parker,et al.  The crawling of young loggerhead turtles toward the sea , 1922 .

[16]  Verheijen Fj,et al.  Photopollution: artificial light optic spatial control systems fail to cope with. Incidents, causation, remedies. , 1985 .

[17]  Jane M. Packard,et al.  Behavioral approaches to conservation in the wild , 1999 .

[18]  R. S. Daniel,et al.  The sea-approach behavior of the neonate loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta). , 1947, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.