The Theory and Implementation of the Quasicontinuum Method

While atomistic simulations have provided great insight into the basic mechanisms of processes like plasticity, diffusion and phase transformations in solids, there is an important limitation to these methods. Specifically, the large number of atoms in any realistic macroscopic structure is typically much too large for direct simulation. Consider that the current benchmark for largescale fully atomistic simulations is on the order of 109 atoms, using massively paralleled computer facilities with hundreds or thousands of CPUs. This represents 1/10 000 of the number of atoms in a typical grain of aluminum, and 1/1 000 000 of the atoms in a typical micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) device. Further, it is apparent that with such a large number of atoms, substantial regions of a problem of interest are essentially behaving like a continuum. Clearly, while fully atomistic calculations are essential to our understanding of the basic “unit” mechanisms of deformation, they will never replace continuum models altogether.

[1]  M. Véron,et al.  Thermodynamics, microstructures, and plasticity , 2003 .

[2]  M. Ortiz,et al.  An adaptive finite element approach to atomic-scale mechanics—the quasicontinuum method , 1997, cond-mat/9710027.

[3]  Vivek B. Shenoy,et al.  Finite Temperature Quasicontinuum Methods , 1998 .

[4]  Atsuyuki Okabe,et al.  Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams , 1992, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics.

[5]  Ronald E. Miller,et al.  The Quasicontinuum Method: Overview, applications and current directions , 2002 .

[6]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[7]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids , 1996 .

[8]  D. Rodney,et al.  Mixed Atomistic/Continuum Methods : Static and Dynamic Quasicontinuum Methods , 2003 .

[9]  Anders E. Carlsson,et al.  Beyond Pair Potentials in Elemental Transition Metals and Semiconductors , 1990 .

[10]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineerng analysis , 1987 .

[11]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[12]  Michael Ortiz,et al.  Mixed Atomistic-Continuum Models of Material Behavior: The Art of Transcending Atomistics and Informing Continua , 2001 .

[13]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing.@@@Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. , 1994 .

[14]  Noam Bernstein,et al.  Mixed finite element and atomistic formulation for complex crystals , 1999 .

[15]  Michael Ortiz,et al.  Nanomechanics of Defects in Solids , 1998 .

[16]  E. B. Tadmor,et al.  Quasicontinuum models of interfacial structure and deformation , 1998 .

[17]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Effective-medium theory of chemical binding: Application to chemisorption , 1980 .

[18]  Ronald E. Miller,et al.  Atomistic/continuum coupling in computational materials science , 2003 .

[19]  Michael Ortiz,et al.  Mixed Atomistic and Continuum Models of Deformation in Solids , 1996 .

[20]  R. Fisher Reproduced with Permission of the Royal Society , 2004 .

[21]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in FORTRAN (2nd ed.): the art of scientific computing , 1992 .

[22]  Weber,et al.  Computer simulation of local order in condensed phases of silicon. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[23]  M. Baskes,et al.  Embedded-atom method: Derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals , 1984 .