Vented versus unvented chest seals for treatment of pneumothorax and prevention of tension pneumothorax in a swine model

BACKGROUND Unvented chest seals (CSs) are currently recommended for the management of penetrating thoracic injuries in the battlefield. Since no supporting data exist, we compared the efficacy of a preferred unvented with that of a vented CS in a novel swine model of pneumothorax (PTx). METHODS An open chest wound was created in the left thorax of spontaneously air-breathing anesthetized pigs (n = 8). A CS was applied over the injury, then tension PTx was induced by incremental air injections (0.2 L) into the pleural cavity via a cannula that was also used to measure intrapleural pressure (IP). Both CS were tested on each pig in series. Tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate, IP, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, central venous pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, venous and peripheral oxygen saturations (SvO2, SpO2) were recorded. Tension PTx was defined as a mean IP equal to or greater than +1 mm Hg plus significant (20–30%) deviation in baseline levels of the previously mentioned parameters and confirmed by chest x-ray study. PaO2 and PaCo2 were also measured. RESULTS PTx produced immediate breathing difficulty and significant rises in IP and pulmonary arterial pressure and falls in VT, SpO2, and SvO2. Both CSs returned these parameters to near baseline within 5 minutes of application. After vented CS was applied, serial air injections up to 2 L resulted in no significant change in the previously mentioned parameters. After unvented CS application, progressive deterioration of all respiratory parameters and onset of tension PTx were observed in all subjects after approximately 1.4-L air injection. CONCLUSION Both vented and unvented CSs provided immediate improvements in breathing and blood oxygenation in our model of penetrating thoracic trauma. However, in the presence of ongoing intrapleural air accumulation, the unvented CS led to tension PTx, hypoxemia, and possible respiratory arrest, while the vented CS prevented these outcomes.

[1]  J. Holcomb,et al.  Needle versus Tube Thoracostomy in a Swine Model of Traumatic Tension Hemopneumothorax , 2009, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[2]  F. Arnaud,et al.  Evaluation of chest seal performance in a swine model: comparison of Asherman vs. Bolin seal. , 2008, Injury.

[3]  D. Feigin,et al.  Prevalence of tension pneumothorax in fatally wounded combat casualties. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  G. Peoples,et al.  Combat casualties in Afghanistan cared for by a single Forward Surgical Team during the initial phases of Operation Enduring Freedom. , 2005, Military medicine.

[5]  G. Nardi,et al.  A population-based study on pneumothorax in severely traumatized patients. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  E. Barton,et al.  The pathophysiology of tension pneumothorax in ventilated swine. , 1997, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[7]  Division on Earth Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals , 1996 .

[8]  D. Hoyt,et al.  Prehospital needle aspiration and tube thoracostomy in trauma victims: a six-year experience with aeromedical crews. , 1995, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  A. Wanner,et al.  Immediate cardiovascular effects of tension pneumothorax. , 1983, The American review of respiratory disease.

[10]  R. Rutherford,et al.  The pathophysiology of progressive, tension pneumothorax. , 1968, The Journal of trauma.

[11]  K. Kilburn Cardiorespiratory effects of large pneumothorax in conscious and anesthetized dogs. , 1963, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  J. V. Maloney,et al.  PARADOXICAL RESPIRATION AND “PENDELLUFT” , 1962, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  J. V. Maloney,et al.  Paradoxical respiration and "pendelluft". , 1961 .

[14]  P. F. Scholander,et al.  Counter-current vascular heat exchange in the fins of whales. , 1955, Journal of applied physiology.