When it comes to the impact of absorptive capacity on co-innovation, how really harmful is knowledge leakage?

This paper aims to analyze the moderating effect of knowledge leakage on the relationship between absorptive capacity and co-innovation, which implies collaborative work and knowledge exchange with external actors on virtual innovation platforms.,The research model was tested in a sample of companies through the use of structural equations by the partial least squares method.,The results confirm that absorptive capacity is a prior condition for co-innovation. However, the most interesting and surprising result has to do with knowledge leakage, which actually has a negative moderating effect, but whose size is modest, which dismisses the great damages that such leakage could generate.,This study is pioneering in analyzing knowledge leakage in the context of virtual innovation platforms, which occurs in a different manner as compared to leakage in the context of collaborative research and development, widely analyzed in the literature. However, the main contribution of the paper lies in the fact that the results evidence the existence of an intermediate position between the traditional approach that insists on demonstrating the devastating consequences of the leakage and the emerging approach that dismisses these negative repercussions and conceives leakage as a positive organizational phenomenon, natural and inherent to the interaction of the firm with the environment. The results also contradict recent empirical evidence that completely dismisses the negative repercussions of knowledge leakage in contexts where incremental innovations prevail.

[1]  Wei Guo,et al.  Factors facilitating user projects success in co-innovation communities , 2017, Kybernetes.

[2]  Yan Lin,et al.  Wisdom of crowds: the effect of participant composition and contribution behavior on Wikipedia article quality , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM , 2019, European Business Review.

[4]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[5]  Paavo Ritala,et al.  External knowledge sharing and radical innovation: the downsides of uncontrolled openness , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Greater associative knowledge variety in crowdsourcing platforms leads to generation of novel solutions by crowds , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Eonsoo Kim,et al.  Balancing absorptive capacity and inbound open innovation for sustained innovative performance: An attention-based view , 2016 .

[8]  Katja Hutter,et al.  Machiavellianism or Morality: Which Behavior Pays Off In Online Innovation Contests? , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[10]  Barbara Bigliardi,et al.  Redesigning the model of the initiation and evolution of inter-firm knowledge transfer in R&D relationships , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Daniela Isidori,et al.  of Knowledge Management , 2016 .

[12]  Susanne Durst,et al.  Mapping knowledge risks: towards a better understanding of knowledge management , 2018, Knowledge Management Research & Practice.

[13]  Frank T. Piller,et al.  Assessing the not-invented-here syndrome: Development and validation of implicit and explicit measurements , 2017 .

[14]  H. Saragih,et al.  Co-innovation: a review and conceptual framework , 2018 .

[15]  Hung-Tai Tsou,et al.  Antecedents of co-development and its effect on innovation performance , 2019, Management Decision.

[16]  P. Ritala,et al.  Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: An empirical study , 2015 .

[17]  Rainer Harms,et al.  Knowledge management and coopetition: How do cooperating competitors balance the needs to share and protect their knowledge? , 2019, Industrial Marketing Management.

[18]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Unintentional, unavoidable, and beneficial knowledge leakage from the multinational enterprise , 2018, Journal of International Business Studies.

[19]  J. Hervás-Oliver,et al.  Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: a forgotten lesson for policymakers , 2011 .

[20]  J. Salo,et al.  The value of long-term co-innovation relationships: experiential approach , 2018 .

[21]  Jose Arias-Pérez,et al.  Big data analytics capability and co-innovation: An empirical study , 2019, Heliyon.

[22]  Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro,et al.  Tips to use partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in knowledge management , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[23]  Debora Halbert,et al.  Intellectual property theft and national security: Agendas and assumptions , 2016, Inf. Soc..

[24]  Ann-Kristin Zobel,et al.  Benefiting from Open Innovation: A Multidimensional Model of Absorptive Capacity * , 2017 .

[25]  M. M. Naqshbandi,et al.  Knowledge infrastructure capability, absorptive capacity and inbound open innovation: evidence from SMEs in France , 2019, Production Planning & Control.

[26]  Exequiel Hernandez,et al.  Network Defense: Pruning, Grafting, and Closing to Prevent Leakage of Strategic Knowledge to Rivals , 2014 .

[27]  Kaveh Abhari,et al.  Co-innovation platform affordances: Developing a conceptual model and measurement instrument , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[28]  Benedetta Soranzo,et al.  The impact of formal and informal appropriability regimes on SME profitability in medium high-tech industries , 2015, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[29]  Jose Arias-Perez,et al.  Triggering Open Innovation Processes Through Organizational Emotional Capability and Rival's Absorptive Capacity Orientation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[30]  Luis M. Molina,et al.  Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity , 2011 .

[31]  Albert G Z Hu,et al.  China as number one? Evidence from China's most recent patenting surge , 2017 .

[32]  Yonggui Wang,et al.  The double-edged effects of perceived knowledge hiding: empirical evidence from the sales context , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[33]  Ned Kock,et al.  Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[34]  S. Zahra,et al.  A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. , 2011 .

[35]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  Communitition: The Tension between Competition and Collaboration in Community-Based Design Contests , 2011 .

[36]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  The effect of social networking sites and absorptive capacity on SMES’ innovation performance , 2016, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[37]  M. M. Naqshbandi,et al.  Managerial ties and open innovation: examining the role of absorptive capacity , 2016 .