Further investigation of the application of deep learning for electromagnetic simulation prediction

Applications seeking to exploit electromagnetic scattering characteristics of an imaging or detection problem typically require a large number of electromagnetic simulations in order to understand relevant object phenomena. It has been shown in a previous work that deep learning may be used to increase the efficiency of creating such datasets by providing estimations comparable to simulation results. In this work, we further investigate the utility of deep learning for electromagnetic simulation prediction by adding to the existing training and testing dataset while also incorporating additional material properties. Specifically, we explore using artificial neural networks to learn the connection between a generic object and its resulting bistatic radar cross section, thereby removing the need to repeatedly perform timely simulations. While deep learning can be seen as a computationally expensive technique, this cost is only experienced during the training of the system and not subsequently in the acquisition of results. The goal of this work is to further investigate the applicability of deep learning for electromagnetic simulation prediction as well as its potential limitations. Additionally, performance is compared for different data pre-processing techniques focused on data reduction.

[1]  Mark A. Richards,et al.  Principles of Modern Radar: Basic Principles , 2013 .

[2]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[3]  Ming Lyu,et al.  Study of Bistatic Angle's Impact on Imaging Performance in Bistatic RCS Measurement , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things (IIKI).

[4]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[5]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[6]  Christopher J. Bradley The Calibration of Bistatic Radar Cross Section Measurements , 2012 .

[7]  Atef Z. Elsherbeni,et al.  The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method for Electromagnetics with MATLAB® Simulations , 2015 .

[8]  J. S. Goldstein,et al.  Full-polarization matched-illumination for target detection and identification , 2002 .

[9]  Adib Y. Nashashibi,et al.  Bistatic SAR imaging: A novel approach using a stationary receiver , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[10]  Jianming Jin Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields , 2010 .

[11]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks and Learning Machines , 2010 .

[12]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[13]  Stanton R. Price,et al.  Investigating the application of deep learning for electromagnetic simulation prediction , 2018, Defense + Security.

[14]  D. Thiripurasundari,et al.  Review on Computational Electromagnetics , 2017 .

[15]  Frank Jay,et al.  IEEE standard dictionary of electrical and electronics terms , 1984 .

[16]  James M. Keller,et al.  Extending the Scale Invariant Feature Transform Descriptor into the Color Domain , 2008 .

[17]  Steven R. Price,et al.  Impacts of Wall–Target Interaction on Matched Illumination Waveforms for TWRI , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[18]  J. Patrick Donohoe,et al.  Effects of wall moisture profiles on matched illumination waveforms — Simulation and measurement , 2014, 2014 IEEE Radar Conference.

[19]  Steven R. Price,et al.  Matched illumination waveform design for enhanced tunnel detection , 2017, Defense + Security.

[20]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[21]  Martin Fodslette Meiller A Scaled Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for Fast Supervised Learning , 1993 .

[22]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .