Two alternate mechanisms contribute to the persistence of interdependent lineages in Pogonomyrmex harvester ants

Some populations of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants comprise pairs of highly differentiated lineages with queens mating at random with several males of their own and of the alternate lineage. These queens produce two types of diploid offspring, those fertilized by males of the queens’ lineage which develop into new queens and those fertilized by males of the other lineage which mostly develop into functionally sterile workers. This unusual mode of genetic caste determination has been found in 26 populations and a total of four lineage pairs (F1‐F2, G1‐G2, H1‐H2 and J1‐J2) have been described in these populations. Despite the fact that a few interlineage queens are produced, previous studies revealed that there is a complete lack of genetic introgression between lineages. Here we quantify the proportion of interlineage queens produced in each of the four lineage pairs and determine the fate of these queens. In the F1‐F2, G1‐G2 and H1‐H2 lineage pairs, interlineage queens were produced by a minority of colonies. These colonies exclusively produced interlineage queens and workers, suggesting that interlineage eggs can develop into queens in these three pairs of lineages in the absence of competition with pure‐lineage brood. An analysis of three key stages of the colony life cycle revealed that colonies headed by interlineage queens failed to grow sufficiently to produce reproductive individuals. In laboratory comparisons, interlineage queens produced fewer viable eggs, with the effect that they raised fewer workers and lost more weight per worker produced than pure‐lineage queens. In the J1‐J2 lineage pair, we did not find a single interlineage queen, raising the possibility that interlineage eggs have completely lost the ability to develop into queens in this lineage pair. Hence, two distinct mechanisms seem to account for the complete lack of between‐lineage gene flow in the F1‐F2, G1‐G2, H1‐H2 and J1‐J2 lineage pairs.

[1]  L. Keller,et al.  Characterization and distribution of Pogonomyrmex harvester ant lineages with genetic caste determination , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[2]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Population-wide lineage frequencies predict genetic load in the seed-harvester ant Pogonomyrmex , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J. Fewell,et al.  Distribution and evolution of genetic caste determination in Pogonomyrmex seed-harvester ants. , 2006, Ecology.

[4]  G. Umphrey Sperm parasitism in ants: selection for interspecific mating and hybridization. , 2006, Ecology.

[5]  L. Keller,et al.  Reproductive isolation between Pogonomyrmex rugosus and two lineages with genetic caste determination. , 2006, Ecology.

[6]  M. Wade,et al.  Genetic caste determination in harvester ants: possible origin and maintenance by cyto-nuclear epistasis. , 2006, Ecology.

[7]  L. Keller,et al.  Genetic caste determination in Pogonomyrmex harvester ants imposes costs during colony founding , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[8]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The genetic basis of reproductive isolation: Insights from Drosophila , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  L. Keller,et al.  Loss of Phenotypic Plasticity Generates Genotype-Caste Association in Harvester Ants , 2004, Current Biology.

[10]  L. Keller,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PHENOTYPE, MATING BEHAVIOR, AND FITNESS OF QUEENS IN THE ANT LASIUS NIGER , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  B. Cole,et al.  QUEEN SIZE MEDIATES QUEEN SURVIVAL AND COLONY FITNESS IN HARVESTER ANTS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  L. Keller,et al.  Complex hybrid origin of genetic caste determination in harvester ants , 2003, Nature.

[13]  J. Oettler,et al.  Determinants of intracolonial relatedness in Pogonomyrmex rugosus (Hymenoptera; Formicidae): mating frequency and brood raids , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[14]  S. Cahan,et al.  REPRODUCTIVE DIVISION OF LABOR BETWEEN HYBRID AND NONHYBRID OFFSPRING IN A FIRE ANT HYBRID ZONE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  C. Deheer A comparison of the colony-founding potential of queens from single- and multiple-queen colonies of the fire antSolenopsis invicta , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Steven W. Rissing,et al.  Extreme genetic differences between queens and workers in hybridizing Pogonomyrmex harvester ants , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the red harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus , 2002 .

[18]  D. Greig,et al.  Epistasis and hybrid sterility in Saccharomyces , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Jürgen Gadau,et al.  Genetic determination of the queen caste in an ant hybrid zone , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Genetic basis for queen–worker dimorphism in a social insect , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  S. Yamane,et al.  Flexibility of first brood production in a claustral ant, Camponotus japonicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2001, Journal of Ethology.

[22]  M. Arnold,et al.  Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. , 2001, Annual review of genetics.

[23]  D. Gordon,et al.  Colony age, neighborhood density and reproductive potential in harvester ants , 1999, Oecologia.

[24]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Spontaneous heterosis in larval life-history traits of hemiclonal frog hybrids. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Rob J. Kulathinal,et al.  CYTOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PREMEIOTIC VERSUS POSTMEIOTIC DEFECTS PRODUCING HYBRID MALE STERILITY AMONG SIBLING SPECIES OF THE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER COMPLEX , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  R. Danzmann,et al.  Electrophoretic evidence for hybridization in the ant genus Acanthomyops (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1998 .

[27]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests , 1996 .

[28]  N. Barton,et al.  Analysis of Hybrid Zones , 1985 .

[29]  S. Vinson,et al.  Interspecific Hybridization and Caste Specificity of Protein in Fire Ant , 1977, Science.