The diffusion of internet voting. Usage patterns of internet voting in Estonia between 2005 and 2015

E-voting has the potential to lower participation thresholds and increase turnout, but its technical complexity may produce other barriers to participation. Using Rogers' theory of the diffusion of innovations, we examined how the use of e-voting has changed over time. Data from eight e-enabled elections between 2005 and 2015 in Estonia, were used to investigate changes to the profile of e-voters and contrast them to those voting by conventional means. Owing to the aggregate share of e-voters increasing with each election, with one third of voters now casting their vote remotely over the internet, there was a lack of conclusive evidence regarding whether the new voting technology had diffused homogenously among the voting population, or remained a channel for the resourceful and privileged. Our findings show that diffusion has taken place, but not until after the first three e-enabled elections. Thus, internet voting has the potential to be used by a wide range of voter types, bridge societal divisions, and emerge as an inclusive innovative voting technology.

[1]  R. Gibson,et al.  Elections Online: Assessing Internet Voting in Light of the Arizona Democratic Primary , 2001 .

[2]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[3]  Christopher F. Baum.  An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata , 2006 .

[4]  R. Alvarez,et al.  Are Americans Confident Their Ballots Are Counted? , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[5]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet , 2010, Perspectives on Politics.

[6]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  The Likely Consequences of Internet Voting for Political Representation , 2001 .

[7]  Kristjan Vassil,et al.  Internet voting in Estonia : a comparative analysis of four elections since 2005 : report for the Council of Europe , 2010 .

[8]  William Wresch,et al.  Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[9]  Eric Abrahamson.  Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations , 1991 .

[10]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace `Revolution′ , 2000 .

[11]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  Controlling Democracy: The Principal–Agent Problems in Election Administration , 2006 .

[12]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[13]  Johannes A.G.M.,et al.  Widening Information Gaps and Policies of Prevention. , 2000 .

[14]  Stewart E. Tolnay,et al.  The Persistence of High Fertility in the American South on the Eve of the Baby Boom , 1994, Demography.

[15]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[16]  P. Hedström.  Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Thad E. Hall,et al.  Internet Voting in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Estonia , 2009, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[18]  F. Schiavone,et al.  Limits to the diffusion of innovation: A literature review and integrative model , 2010 .

[19]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[20]  Barbara Wejnert.  Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: a Conceptual Framework. , 2002 .

[21]  Pippa Norris,et al.  Will New Technology Boost Turnout? Evaluating Experiments in E-Voting V. All-Postal Voting Facilities in UK Local Elections , 2003 .

[22]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  Point, Click, and Vote - The Future of Internet Voting , 2003 .

[23]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  Widening Information Gaps and Policies of Prevention , 2000 .

[24]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[25]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society , 2005 .

[26]  B. Ryan.  The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities , 1943 .

[27]  Kristjan Vassil,et al.  A bottleneck model of e-voting: Why technology fails to boost turnout , 2011, New Media Soc..

[28]  C. Mood.  Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It , 2010 .

[29]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  The Perverse Consequences of Electoral Reform in the United States , 2005 .

[30]  Detlef Jahn,et al.  Globalization as ‘Galton's Problem’: The Missing Link in the Analysis of Diffusion Patterns in Welfare State Development , 2006, International Organization.

[31]  Harvey Starr,et al.  Democratic Dominoes , 1991 .