Effect of hospital setting and volume on clinical outcomes in women with gestational and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE Efforts to improve health care outcomes in the United States have led some organizations to recommend specific hospital settings or case volumes for complex medical diagnoses and procedures. But there are few studies of the effect of setting and volume on maternal outcomes, particularly in complicated conditions, such as diabetes. Our objective was to estimate the effect of hospital setting and volume on childbirth morbidity and length of stay in pregnancies complicated by type 2 and gestational diabetes. METHODS We analyzed Maryland hospital discharge data during 1999-2004. The dependent variables were primary cesarean delivery, episiotomy, a composite variable for severe maternal morbidity, and hospital length of stay. The independent variables were hospital setting (community, non-teaching hospitals, community, teaching hospitals, and academic medical centers) and tertiles of annual hospital diabetes delivery volume. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess the relation of hospital setting with each outcome, adjusting for hospital volume and maternal case mix. RESULTS 5,507 deliveries with type 2 (15%) and gestational (85%) diabetes were analyzed. Primary cesarean delivery rates among women with any diabetes did not vary across settings. After adjustment for volume and patient case mix, the likelihood of severe maternal morbidity was higher among deliveries at academic centers compared to community, non-teaching hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.0, 4.2). Academic centers had a protective effect (OR, 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.7) and community teaching hospitals had a borderline protective effect (OR, 0.8; 95% CI: 0.7, 1.0) on episiotomy, compared to community, non-teaching hospitals. Length of stay was greater at academic centers and community, teaching hospitals compared to community, non-teaching hospitals (5.4 days, 3.5 days vs. 2.8 days, respectively). We did not identify an independent association between hospital diabetes volume and clinical outcomes after adjustment for case mix. CONCLUSIONS Among women with type 2 and gestational diabetes, hospital setting is associated with a higher likelihood of severe maternal morbidity and length of stay, independent of volume. Patient case mix accounts for some of the variation across settings. The volume-outcome relationship found with other complex medical conditions or procedures was not found among diabetic pregnancies. Further investigations are needed to explain variations in outcomes across hospital settings and volumes.

[1]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  H. Pitt,et al.  Should hepatic resections be performed at high-volume referral centers? , 2007, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[3]  W. Gilbert,et al.  Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Aaron B Caughey,et al.  Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  P. O’Connor,et al.  Are Claims Data Accurate Enough to Identify Patients for Performance Measures or Quality Improvement? The Case of Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Depression , 2006, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[6]  R. Lamont.  Setting up a preterm prevention clinic: a practical guide , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request: Obstetrician–Gynecologists’ Knowledge, Perception, and Practice Patterns , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  G. Macones,et al.  Effect of hospital volume on maternal outcomes in women with prior cesarean delivery undergoing trial of labor. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  S. Gabbe,et al.  Management of Diabetes Mellitus by Obstetrician–Gynecologists , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  L. Meyn,et al.  Episiotomy Use in the United States, 1979–1997 , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  H. Dahlen,et al.  General obstetrics: Does size matter? A population‐based study of birth in lower volume maternity hospitals for low risk women , 2005 .

[12]  M. van Ryn,et al.  Physicians' perceptions of patients' social and behavioral characteristics and race disparities in treatment recommendations for men with coronary artery disease. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[13]  Geoff M. Anderson,et al.  Trends in deliveries, prenatal care, and obstetrical complications in women with pregestational diabetes: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996-2001. , 2006, Diabetes care.

[14]  Debra L Roter,et al.  Patient-Centered Communication, Ratings of Care, and Concordance of Patient and Physician Race , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  D. Henderson-smart,et al.  How useful are hospital morbidity data for monitoring conditions occurring in the perinatal period? , 2005, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[16]  A. Ferrara,et al.  An Increase in the Incidence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Northern California, 1991–2000 , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  J. Feinglass,et al.  Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety? , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  S. Bernard,et al.  Maternal complications of normal deliveries: variation among rural hospitals. , 2000, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[19]  Bengt Persson,et al.  Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes , 2009 .

[20]  M. LeFevre.  Physician Volume and Obstetric Outcome , 1992, Medical care.

[21]  M. Talamini,et al.  Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Hospital volume is related to clinical and economic outcomes of esophageal resection in Maryland. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  K. Joseph,et al.  Maternal Outcomes in Pregnancies Complicated by Obesity , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  M. Gissler,et al.  Birth outcomes by level of obstetric care in Finland: a catchment area based analysis. , 1994, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[25]  D. Matchar,et al.  Theories explaining racial differences in the utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for cerebrovascular disease. , 1995, The Milbank quarterly.

[26]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Postoperative complication rates after hepatic resection in Maryland hospitals. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[27]  T. Gordon,et al.  Effect of Academic Affiliation and Obstetric Volume on Clinical Outcome and Cost of Childbirth , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  D. Oleske,et al.  A comparison of capitated and fee-for-service Medicaid reimbursement methods on pregnancy outcomes. , 1998, Health services research.

[29]  A. Linton,et al.  Clinical Case Mix Adjustment of Cesarean Delivery Rates in U.S. Military Hospitals, 2002 , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  D. Feig,et al.  Type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: a growing concern , 2002, The Lancet.

[31]  K. Lohr,et al.  Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[32]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Adverse events during medical and surgical hospitalizations for persons with schizophrenia. , 2006, Archives of general psychiatry.

[33]  J. Kaczorowski,et al.  Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome? , 2002, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.