Quality investment, and the contract manufacturer's encroachment

Abstract This paper studies a supply chain in which the incumbent original equipment manufacturer is the quality leader and the encroaching contract manufacturer is the quality follower acting as a free rider for the former’s investment in quality improvement. Investigations were made into the contract manufacturer’s encroaching conditions and the original equipment manufacturer’s strategies of investment in quality improvement to deter the contract manufacturer’s encroachment. Results show that, different from the traditional encroachment, the contract manufacturer always has the incentive to encroach on the original equipment manufacturer’s final market if there is no quality investment opportunity. However, if quality investment is attainable for the original equipment manufacturer, there exists a threshold for the contract manufacturer’s imitating capability, in excess of which the contract manufacturer will encroach on the original equipment manufacturer’s final market. The structure of quality improvement plays a critical role regarding deterring the contract manufacturer’s imitation and encroachment, and the encroachment is conditional when the contract manufacturer’s imitating ability is relatively weak. Moreover, the threat of the potential entrant will facilitate the original equipment manufacturer’s quality investment, even though the quality investment per se is unprofitable. Under certain conditions with quality investment, the contract manufacturer’s encroachment can improve the original equipment manufacturer’s profit, thus achieving a win–win outcome.

[1]  Wenqiang Xiao,et al.  Should an OEM Retain Component Procurement when the CM Produces Competing Products , 2012 .

[2]  Nobuo Matsubayashi,et al.  Price and quality competition: The effect of differentiation and vertical integration , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Fernando Bernstein,et al.  Comparative statics, strategic complements and substitutes in oligopolies , 2004 .

[4]  Vania Sena,et al.  Domestic R&D Spillovers and Absorptive Capacity: Some Evidence for US, Europe and Japan , 2018 .

[5]  D. Sappington,et al.  The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment , 2007 .

[6]  Sanjiv Erat,et al.  The Pitfalls of Subsystem Integration: When Less is More , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[7]  A. Dixit The Role Of Investment In Entry-Deterrence , 1980 .

[8]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Quality and Competition , 1998 .

[9]  Ulrich Lehmann-Grube,et al.  Strategic Choice of Quality When Quality is Costly: The Persistence of the High-Quality Advantage , 1997 .

[10]  Johan L. Perols,et al.  On the relationship between supplier integration and time-to-market , 2013 .

[11]  Panagiotis Kouvelis,et al.  Quality-Based Competition, Profitability, and Variable Costs , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Feryal Erhun,et al.  Quality and entry deterrence , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Supply Network Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence From the Electronics Industry , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  Xin Geng,et al.  Strategic Inventory and Supplier Encroachment , 2019, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[15]  Jeremy Bertomeu,et al.  Optimal Conservatism with Earnings Manipulation , 2015 .

[16]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Using Supplier Networks to Learn Faster , 2004 .

[17]  Volodymyr Babich,et al.  Managing Opportunistic Supplier Product Adulteration: Deferred Payments, Inspection, and Combined Mechanisms. Extended Technical Report , 2010, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[18]  Hyoduk Shin,et al.  Do Firms Invest in Forecasting Efficiently? The Effect of Competition on Demand Forecast Investments and Supply Chain Coordination , 2010, Oper. Res..

[19]  Zhuoxin Li,et al.  Supplier Encroachment under Asymmetric Information , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[20]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[21]  Ruud H. Teunter,et al.  Competition for cores in remanufacturing , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Anand Nair,et al.  Dynamics of competing with quality- and advertising-based goodwill , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[24]  Shlomo Weber,et al.  Limit Qualities and Entry Deterrence , 1995 .

[25]  B. Mantin,et al.  The Strategic Role of Third-Party Marketplaces in Retailing , 2014 .

[26]  A. Arora,et al.  Licensing the market for technology , 2003 .

[27]  K. Meyer Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies , 2004 .

[28]  Kenji Matsui,et al.  Strategic upfront marketing channel integration as an entry barrier , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Tony Haitao Cui,et al.  A Price Discrimination Model of Trade Promotions , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[30]  Cheng-Han Wu,et al.  Cooperation regarding technology development in a closed-loop supply chain , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Stefan Lutz,et al.  Vertical product differentiation and entry deterrence , 1997 .

[32]  Albert Y. Ha,et al.  Quality in Supply Chain Encroachment , 2016, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[33]  Werner Boente,et al.  Inter-firm trust in buyer-supplier relations: Are knowledge spillovers and geographical proximity relevant? , 2008 .

[34]  G. Bonanno Location Choice, Product Proliferation and Entry Deterrence , 1987 .

[35]  Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu,et al.  The Role of Contract Negotiation and Industry Structure in Production Outsourcing , 2013 .

[36]  Jianxiong Zhang,et al.  Manufacturer encroachment with quality decision under asymmetric demand information , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..