An open platform centric approach for scalable government service delivery to the poor: The Aadhaar case

Abstract The efficient delivery of government services to the poor, or Bottom of the Pyramid (BOP), faces many challenges. While a core problem is the lack of scalability, that could be solved by the rapid proliferation of platforms and associated ecosystems. Existing research involving platforms focus on modularity, openness, ecosystem leadership and governance, as well as on their impact on innovation, scale and agility. However, existing studies fail to explore the role of platform in scalable e-government services delivery on an empirical level. Based on an in-depth case study of the world's largest biometric identity platform, used by millions of the poor in India, we develop a set of propositions connecting the attributes of a digital platform ecosystem to different indicators for the scalability of government service delivery. We found that modular architecture, combined with limited functionality in core modules, and open standards combined with controlled access and ecosystem governance enabled by keystone behaviour, have a positive impact on scalability. The research provides insights to policy-makers and government officials alike, particularly those in nations struggling to provide basic services to poor and marginalised. This is also one of the few studies to apply platform theory empirically to the e-government domain.

[1]  Tim O'Reilly Government as a Platform , 2011, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[2]  Katri Valkokari,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Ecosystems: A Qualitative Analysis of Ecosystem Positioning Strategies , 2017 .

[3]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Incomplete by Design and Designing for Incompleteness , 2008 .

[4]  G. Walsham,et al.  Research on information systems in developing countries: Current landscape and future prospects , 2006 .

[5]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[6]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Collective action for a common service platform for independent living services , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  Paul Fox,et al.  Technology Ecosystem Governance , 2013 .

[8]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[10]  Richard A. Spinello,et al.  Competing Fairly in the New Economy: Lessons from the Browser Wars , 2005 .

[11]  Vanita Yadav,et al.  Unique Identification Project for 1.2 billion People in India , 2013 .

[12]  A. Gawer Platforms, Markets and Innovation , 2011 .

[13]  France Bélanger,et al.  U-government: a framework for the evolution of e-government , 2005, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[14]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[15]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Varun Grover,et al.  Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: A contingent resource-based theory view , 2016, Inf. Manag..

[17]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[18]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The impact of openness on the market potential of multi-sided platforms: a case study of mobile payment platforms , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Erwin Danneels Trying to become a different type of company: dynamic capability at Smith Corona , 2011 .

[20]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Platform competition: Strategic trade‐offs in platform markets , 2013 .

[21]  Denis G. Arnold,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility at the Base of the Pyramid , 2013 .

[22]  M. Miles Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis , 1979 .

[23]  Jerry Fishenden,et al.  Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: Towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF) , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  G. Walsham,et al.  Digital inclusion projects in developing countries: Processes of institutionalization , 2009 .

[25]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Orchestration Processes in Network-Centric Innovation: Evidence From the Field , 2011 .

[26]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[27]  Thomas L. Huber,et al.  Governance Practices in Platform Ecosystems: Navigating Tensions Between Cocreated Value and Governance Costs , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  J. March,et al.  Learning from Samples of One or Fewer , 1991 .

[29]  Alan Gelb,et al.  Performance Lessons from India’s Universal Identification Program , 2013 .

[30]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Governance of mobile service innovation after the walled gardens , 2011 .

[31]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[32]  Hogeun Lee,et al.  Third-party mobile app developers' continued participation in platform-centric ecosystems: An empirical investigation of two different mechanisms , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[33]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[34]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators , 2008 .

[35]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Differential effects of formal and self-control in mobile platform ecosystems: Multi-method findings on third-party developers' continuance intentions and application quality , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[36]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  Portfolios of control in mobile eco-systems: evolution and validation , 2015 .

[37]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries , 2016 .

[38]  A. Gawer,et al.  How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .

[39]  Andre B. Bondi,et al.  Characteristics of scalability and their impact on performance , 2000, WOSP '00.

[40]  M. Tushman,et al.  Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts , 2012 .

[41]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[42]  A. Gawer Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[43]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[44]  P. Ballon,et al.  Competing Platform Models for Mobile Service Delivery: The Importance of Gatekeeper Roles , 2008, 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business.

[45]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[46]  Jiang Yu,et al.  Linking business ecosystem lifecycle with platform strategy: a triple view of technology, application and organisation , 2013, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[47]  Sally Redman,et al.  The concept of scalability: increasing the scale and potential adoption of health promotion interventions into policy and practice. , 2013, Health promotion international.

[48]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  David Gann,et al.  Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context , 2014 .

[50]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Governing nonprofit platform ecosystems – an information platform for refugees , 2017, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[51]  Laura B. Cardinal Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development , 2001 .

[52]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Platform Leadership How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation , 2002 .

[53]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[54]  A. Hammond,et al.  The Next 4 Billion: Market Size and Business Strategy at the Base of the Pyramid , 2007 .

[55]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[56]  Jing,et al.  Business Ecosystem Strategies of Mobile Network Operators in the 3G Era , 2011 .

[57]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[58]  S. Snell Control Theory In Strategic Human Resource Management: The Mediating Effect Of Administrative Information , 1992 .

[59]  D. McIntyre,et al.  Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps , 2017 .

[60]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Governance mechanisms for mobile service innovation in value networks , 2012 .

[61]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[62]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  ICT platforms and regulatory concerns in Europe , 2011 .

[63]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Lean government and platform-based governance - Doing more with less , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[64]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  The digital platform: a research agenda , 2018, J. Inf. Technol..

[65]  James F. Moore The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems , 1996 .

[66]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[67]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[68]  D. Campbell III. “Degrees of Freedom” and the Case Study , 1975 .

[69]  R. Daft,et al.  Can Organization Studies Begin to Break Out of the Normal Science Straitjacket? An Editorial Essay , 1990 .

[70]  Slinger Jansen,et al.  Defining software ecosystems: a survey of software platforms and business network governance , 2012 .

[71]  Francesco Zirpoli,et al.  Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry , 2013 .

[72]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[73]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  Why Controls Are Used in Platform Ecosystems?: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Rank Roles of Control Mechanisms in Platform Ecosystems , 2016, Int. J. E Serv. Mob. Appl..

[74]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The great theory hunt: Does e-government really have a problem? , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[75]  Jeremy Millard,et al.  ICT-enabled public sector innovation: trends and prospects , 2013, ICEGOV.