Is ASA Micro-credit Reaching the Poor in Bangladesh?

This paper attempts to evaluate how successful has ASA through its micro-credit activities been at reaching poor people in Bangladesh. Key issues in the micro-credit debate are discussed. Data collected in a 2009 survey of ASA micro-credit borrowers is analysed. It is found that over half of borrowers own no land. In addition, it is found that two-fifth of borrowers report having no formal education or only the ability to read and write. Since landless and low education are perhaps the two main determinants of poverty, our main conclusion is that ASA is indeed provides loans primarily to poor people

[1]  Matthieu Chemin The Benefits and Costs of Microfinance: Evidence from Bangladesh , 2008 .

[2]  M. Shamsudin,et al.  Perception and Attitude of Microcredit Borrowers towards Effectiveness of Agricultural Diversification and Intensification Project in Bangladesh , 2007 .

[3]  Lutfun N. Khan Osmani A breakthrough in women's bargaining power: the impact of microcredit , 2007 .

[4]  Dean S. Karlan,et al.  Teaching Entrepreneurship: Impact of Business Training on Microfinance Clients and Institutions , 2006, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[5]  M. Godquin,et al.  Microfinance Repayment Performance in Bangladesh: How to Improve the Allocation of Loans by MFIs , 2004 .

[6]  A. Ullah Empowerment of Women in Bangladesh: Does it Help Make Reproductive Decision? , 2004 .

[7]  P. Mosley,et al.  Working with the ultra‐poor: learning from BRAC experiences , 2004 .

[8]  Mark Schreiner,et al.  Microenterprise Development Programs in the United States and in the Developing World , 2003 .

[9]  S. Khandker,et al.  Does Micro-Credit Empower Women? Evidence from Bangladesh , 2003 .

[10]  D. Hulme,et al.  Programs for the Poorest: Learning from the IGVGD Program in Bangladesh , 2003 .

[11]  Giorgio Topa,et al.  Does microcredit reach the poor and vulnerable? Evidence from northern Bangladesh , 2003 .

[12]  B. Milgram Operationalizing microfinance : Women and craftwork in Ifugao, Upland Philippines , 2001 .

[13]  Sergio Navajas,et al.  Microcredit and the Poorest of the Poor: Theory and Evidence from Bolivia , 2000 .

[14]  Manohar P. Sharma,et al.  Placement and Outreach of Group-Based Credit Organizations: The Cases of ASA, BRAC, and PROSHIKA in Bangladesh , 1999 .

[15]  Maitreesh Ghatak,et al.  Group lending, local information and peer selection , 1999 .

[16]  Bruce Wydick,et al.  Can Social Cohesion Be Harnessed to Repair Market Failures? Evidence from Group Lending in Guatemala , 1999 .

[17]  J. Morduch Does Microfinance Really Help the Poor? New Evidence from Flagship Programs in Bangladesh , 1998 .

[18]  Manfred Zeller,et al.  Determinants of Repayment Performance in Credit Groups: The Role of Program Design, Intragroup Risk Pooling, and Social Cohesion , 1998, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[19]  Manfred Zeller,et al.  Repayment performance in group-based credit programs in Bangladesh , 1997 .

[20]  B. Rogaly Micro-finance evangelism, 'destitute women', and the hard selling of a new anti-poverty formula , 1996 .

[21]  Michael Bratton Financing smallholder production: A comparison of individual and group credit schemes in Zimbabwe , 1986 .

[22]  L. Reed State of the Microcredit Summit Campaign Report 2011 , 2011 .

[23]  Syed Hashemi Linking microfinance and safety net programs to include the poorest - the case of IGVGD in Bangladesh , 2005 .

[24]  J. H. Carr,et al.  Replicating microfinance in the United States , 2002 .

[25]  I. Hanak "Working Her Way Out of Poverty": Micro-credit Programs' Undelivered Promises in Poverty , 2000 .

[26]  H. Zaman,et al.  Assessing the Poverty and Vulnerability Impact of Micro-Credit in Bangladesh : A case study of BRAC , 1999 .