Trilinear Modeling of Event-Related Potentials

This paper describes a method for estimating a set of spatial components (brain maps) and temporal components (waveforms) of brain potentials. These components play the role of bases of a coordinate system, in the sense that the brain potentials of any subject can be represented as superpositions of these components. The representation is unique given the spatial and temporal components, and this decomposition is particularly appealing for comparing the brain potentials of different subjects (say alcoholics and controls). It can also be used for single trial modeling, clinical classification of patients, and data filtering. The method is based on the topographic component model (TCM, Möcks 1988) which models brain potentials in a trilinear form. We extend the TCM in two aspects. First, the diagonal amplitude matrix is replaced by a general loading matrix based on some neurophysiological considerations. Secondly, the number of spatial components and the number of temporal components can be different. The spatial components and temporal components are obtained respectively by performing singular value decomposition (SVD). This method is illustrated with visual P3 data.

[1]  Kongming Wang,et al.  Local Polynomial Estimate of Surface Laplacian , 2004, Brain Topography.

[2]  J. Mocks,et al.  Topographic components model for event-related potentials and some biophysical considerations , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Daniel S. Ruchkin,et al.  Principles of Neurobiological Signal Analysis , 1976 .

[4]  D Graupe,et al.  Topographic components analysis of evoked potentials: estimation of model parameters and evaluation of parameter uniqueness. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[5]  V. Samar,et al.  Multiresolution Analysis of Event-Related Potentials by Wavelet Decomposition , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[6]  Yves Meyer Wavelets - algorithms & applications , 1993 .

[7]  G Fein,et al.  Representation of multi-channel evoked potential data using a dipole component model of intracranial generators: application to the auditory P300. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[9]  E. John,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL BACKGROUND: SIGNAL ANALYSIS AND BEHAVIORAL CORRELATES OF EVOKED POTENTIAL CONFIGURATIONS IN CATS * , 1964, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Bernice Porjesz,et al.  Spatial Enhancement of Event-Related Potentials Using Multiresolution Analysis , 2004, Brain Topography.

[11]  Richard N. Harner,et al.  Singular Value Decomposition—A general linear model for analysis of multivariate structure in the electroencephalogram , 2005, Brain Topography.

[12]  A. Achim,et al.  Toward a dynamic topographic components model. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  E. Donchin Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review , 1978 .

[14]  M. R. Raghuveer,et al.  Matched Meyer neural wavelets for clinical and experimental analysis of auditory and visual evoked potentials , 1996, 1996 8th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 1996).

[15]  Daniel Graupe,et al.  Topographic component (Parallel Factor) analysis of multichannel evoked potentials: Practical issues in trilinear spatiotemporal decomposition , 2005, Brain Topography.

[16]  J. R. Hughes Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research , 1980 .

[17]  George Fein,et al.  Representation of multi-channel evoked potential data using a dipole component model of intracranial generators: application to the auditory P300☆ , 1990 .

[18]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data , 1995, NIPS.