Prolonged Perceptual Learning of Positional Acuity in Adult Amblyopia: Perceptual Template Retuning Dynamics

Amblyopia is a developmental abnormality that results in physiological alterations in the visual cortex and impairs form vision. It is often successfully treated by patching the sound eye in infants and young children, but is generally considered to be untreatable in adults. However, a number of recent studies suggest that repetitive practice of a visual task using the amblyopic eye results in improved performance in both children and adults with amblyopia. These perceptual learning studies have used relatively brief periods of practice; however, clinical studies have shown that the time-constant for successful patching is long. The time-constant for perceptual learning in amblyopia is still unknown. Here we show that the time-constant for perceptual learning depends on the degree of amblyopia. Severe amblyopia requires >50 h (≈35,000 trials) to reach plateau, yielding as much as a five-fold improvement in performance at a rate of ≈1.5%/h. There is significant transfer of learning from the amblyopic to the dominant eye, suggesting that the learning reflects alterations in higher decision stages of processing. Using a reverse correlation technique, we document, for the first time, a dynamic retuning of the amblyopic perceptual decision template and a substantial reduction in internal spatial distortion. These results show that the mature amblyopic brain is surprisingly malleable, and point to more intensive treatment methods for amblyopia.

[1]  Roger W. Li,et al.  Improving the performance of the amblyopic visual system , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Roger W. Li,et al.  Learning to identify near-threshold luminance-defined and contrast-defined letters in observers with amblyopia , 2008, Vision Research.

[3]  R. Sireteanu,et al.  Temporal instability in amblyopic vision: relationship to a displacement map of visual space. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  T. Murphy,et al.  In Vivo Calcium Imaging Reveals Functional Rewiring of Single Somatosensory Neurons after Stroke , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  C. Law,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual learning in a sensory-motor, but not a sensory, cortical area , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Chang-Bing Huang,et al.  Broad bandwidth of perceptual learning in the visual system of adults with anisometropic amblyopia , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  D. Levi Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[8]  Roger W Li,et al.  Extended perceptual learning results in substantial recovery of positional acuity and visual acuity in juvenile amblyopia. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Michael M Merzenich,et al.  Intensive training in adults refines A1 representations degraded in an early postnatal critical period , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The Functional Form of Performance Improvements in Perceptual Learning , 2007, Psychological science.

[11]  Anirvan S. Nandy,et al.  The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[12]  M. Landy,et al.  The effect of viewpoint on perceived visual roughness. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[13]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Identification of contrast-defined letters benefits from perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[14]  Pengjing Xu,et al.  Perceptual learning improves contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in adults with anisometropic amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[15]  Roger W Li,et al.  The receptive field and internal noise for position acuity change with feature separation. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[16]  Roger W Li,et al.  Perceptual learning improves visual performance in juvenile amblyopia. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  M. Moseley,et al.  Treatment of unilateral amblyopia: factors influencing visual outcome. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Rapid plasticity of binocular connections in developing monkey visual cortex (V1). , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Lack of long-term cortical reorganization after macaque retinal lesions , 2005, Nature.

[20]  U. Polat,et al.  Spatial interactions in amblyopia: Effects of stimulus parameters and amblyopia type , 2005, Vision Research.

[21]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia: a reevaluation of critical periods in human vision. , 2005, Developmental psychobiology.

[22]  M. Moseley,et al.  Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  Roger W Li,et al.  Characterizing the mechanisms of improvement for position discrimination in adult amblyopia. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[24]  Michael Belkin,et al.  Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Roger W Li,et al.  Perceptual learning improves efficiency by re-tuning the decision 'template' for position discrimination , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Contour interaction in amblyopia: scale selection , 2001, Vision Research.

[27]  G. Westheimer Is peripheral visual acuity susceptible to perceptual learning in the adult? , 2001, Vision Research.

[28]  M Cleary,et al.  Efficacy of occlusion for strabismic amblyopia: can an optimal duration be identified? , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Unmasking the mechanisms for Vernier acuity: evidence for a template model for Vernier acuity , 2000, Vision Research.

[30]  C. Furmanski,et al.  Perceptual learning in object recognition: object specificity and size invariance , 2000, Vision Research.

[31]  Douglas Newman,et al.  Prevalence of amblyopia among defaulters of preschool vision screening , 2000, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[32]  A. B. Sekuler,et al.  Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning , 1999, Nature.

[33]  D M Levi,et al.  Improvement in Vernier acuity in adults with amblyopia. Practice makes better. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  D M Levi,et al.  Neural plasticity in adults with amblyopia. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Model of peripheral and amblyopic hyperacuity , 1991, Vision Research.

[36]  M E Woodruff,et al.  AMBLYOPIA: BASIC AND CLINICAL ASPECTS , 1991 .

[37]  S. Klein,et al.  Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[38]  S. Klein,et al.  Detection and discrimination of the direction of motion in central and peripheral vision of normal and amblyopic observers , 1984, Vision Research.

[39]  D. M. Green,et al.  CONSISTENCY OF AUDITORY DETECTION JUDGMENTS. , 1963, Psychological review.

[40]  J. Mollon,et al.  Three remarks on perceptual learning. , 1996, Spatial vision.

[41]  Kenneth J. Ciuffreda,et al.  AMBLYOPIA: BASIC AND CLINICAL ASPECTS , 1991 .