A Mortar Finite Element Formulation for Large Deformation Lubricated Contact Problems with Smooth Transition Between Mixed, Elasto-Hydrodynamic and Full Hydrodynamic Lubrication

This work proposes a novel model and numerical formulation for lubricated contact problems describing the mutual interaction between two deformable 3D solid bodies and an interposed fluid film. The solid bodies are consistently described based on nonlinear continuum mechanics allowing for finite deformations and arbitrary constitutive laws. The fluid film is modelled as a quasi-2D flow problem on the interface between the solids governed by the (thickness-)averaged Reynolds equation, which relates pressure to velocity and film thickness, with the latter two fields being provided by the averaged surface velocity and gap profile of the interacting solid bodies. The averaged Reynolds equation accounts for surface roughness utilizing spatially homogenized, effective fluid parameters and for cavitation through a positivity constraint imposed on the pressure field. In contrast to existing approaches, the proposed model accounts for the co-existence of frictional contact tractions and hydrodynamic fluid tractions at every local point on the contact surface of the interacting bodies and covers the entire range from boundary lubrication to mixed, elastohydrodynamic, and eventually to full film hydrodynamic lubrication in one unified modelling framework with smooth transition between these different regimes. Critically, the model relies on a recently proposed regularization scheme for the mechanical contact constraint combining the advantages of classical penalty and Lagrange multiplier approaches by expressing the mechanical contact pressure as a function of the effective gap between the solid bodies while at the same time limiting the minimal gap value occurring at the (theoretical) limit of infinitely high contact pressures. From a methodological point of view, this is the key ingredient to regularize the pressure field in the averaged Reynolds equation, i.e., to avoid the pressure field’s singularity in the limit of vanishing fluid film thickness, and thus to enable a smooth transition between all relevant lubrication regimes. From a physical point of view, this approach can be considered as a model for the elastic deformation of surface asperities, with a bounded magnitude depending on the interacting solids’ surface roughness. The finite element method is applied for spatial discretization of the 3D solid-mechanical problems and the 2D interface effects, consisting of the averaged Reynolds equation governing the fluid film and the non-penetration constraint of the mechanical contact problem, the latter relying on variationally consistent mortar methods for contact traction discretization. A consistent and accurate model behavior is demonstrated and validated by employing several challenging and practically relevant benchmark test cases. The ability of the model to accurately represent the velocity-dependent friction coefficient of the different lubrication regimes (i.e. mixed, elasto-hydrodynamic and full film lubrication) according to the well-known Stribek curve is also demonstrated via test cases. Eventually, a parametric study is performed to analyze the effect of regularization parameter choice.

[1]  Xiaofei Jiang,et al.  A mixed elastohydrodynamic lubrication model with asperity contact , 1999 .

[2]  A. W. Crook,et al.  The lubrication of rollers IV. Measurements of friction and effective viscosity , 1963, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Frictionless 2D Contact formulations for finite deformations based on the mortar method , 2005 .

[4]  Vladislav A. Yastrebov,et al.  Computational framework for monolithic coupling for thin fluid flow in contact interfaces , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[5]  Rong-Tsong Lee,et al.  Pressure Spikes in Elastohydrodynamically Lubricated Conjunctions , 1988 .

[6]  B. J. Hamrock,et al.  Fast Approach for Calculating Film Thicknesses and Pressures in Elastohydrodynamically Lubricated Contacts at High Loads , 1986 .

[7]  D. McElwain,et al.  Elastohydrodynamics of the Eyelid Wiper , 2008, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[8]  Valentin L. Popov,et al.  The research works of Coulomb and Amontons and generalized laws of friction , 2015 .

[9]  A. Neville,et al.  Modelling tribochemistry in the mixed lubrication regime , 2019, Tribology International.

[10]  Benedikt Schott,et al.  A consistent approach for fluid‐structure‐contact interaction based on a porous flow model for rough surface contact , 2018, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

[11]  K. Willner,et al.  A dual Lagrange method for contact problems with regularized contact conditions , 2014 .

[12]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Computational Contact Mechanics , 2002 .

[13]  Brian J. Briscoe,et al.  Friction and lubrication of human skin , 2007 .

[14]  S. R. Wu A penalty formulation and numerical approximation of the Reynolds-Hertz problem of elastohydrodynamic lubrication , 1986 .

[15]  C. Cryer The method of Christopherson for solving free boundary problems for infinite journal bearings by means of finite differences , 1971 .

[16]  Dong Zhu,et al.  A Full Numerical Solution to the Mixed Lubrication in Point Contacts , 2000 .

[17]  A. Klarbring,et al.  Continuum Mechanics Modelling of Large Deformation Contact with Friction , 1995 .

[18]  Hugh Spikes,et al.  The Frictional Properties of Newtonian Fluids in Rolling–Sliding soft-EHL Contact , 2005 .

[19]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  Finite deformation frictional mortar contact using a semi‐smooth Newton method with consistent linearization , 2010 .

[20]  D. Dowson,et al.  Elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication , 1977 .

[21]  Duncan Dowson,et al.  Elastohydrodynamic and micro-elastohydrodynamic lubrication , 1995 .

[23]  Barbara Wohlmuth,et al.  A primal–dual active set strategy for non-linear multibody contact problems , 2005 .

[24]  S. Stupkiewicz,et al.  Finite deformation effects in soft elastohydrodynamic lubrication problems , 2016 .

[25]  K. Willner,et al.  A dual Lagrange method for contact problems with regularized frictional contact conditions: Modelling micro slip , 2015 .

[26]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals , 2005 .

[27]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  Segment-based vs. element-based integration for mortar methods in computational contact mechanics , 2015 .

[28]  H P Evans,et al.  Evaluation of deflection in semi-infinite bodies by a differential method , 2000 .

[29]  T. Laursen,et al.  A mortar-finite element approach to lubricated contact problems , 2009 .

[30]  Barbara I. Wohlmuth,et al.  A Primal-Dual Active Set Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Contact Problems with Coulomb Friction , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[31]  Dirk Bartel,et al.  An axisymmetric hydrodynamic interface element for finite-element computations of mixed lubrication in rubber seals , 2008 .

[32]  Gerhard Poll,et al.  A transient 2D-finite-element approach for the simulation of mixed lubrication effects of reciprocating hydraulic rod seals , 2010 .

[33]  Tod A. Laursen,et al.  A segment-to-segment mortar contact method for quadratic elements and large deformations , 2008 .

[34]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  A consistent and comprehensive computational approach for general Fluid-Structure-Contact Interaction problems , 2019, ArXiv.

[35]  H. Cheng,et al.  Application of Average Flow Model to Lubrication Between Rough Sliding Surfaces , 1979 .

[36]  S. Rohde,et al.  A variational formulation for a class of free boundary problems arising in hydrodynamic lubrication , 1975 .

[37]  Stanisław Stupkiewicz,et al.  Elastohydrodynamic lubrication and finite configuration changes in reciprocating elastomeric seals , 2009 .

[38]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  A dual mortar approach for 3D finite deformation contact with consistent linearization , 2010 .

[39]  H. Cheng,et al.  An Average Flow Model for Determining Effects of Three-Dimensional Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication , 1978 .

[40]  Barbara I. Wohlmuth,et al.  A Mortar Finite Element Method Using Dual Spaces for the Lagrange Multiplier , 2000, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[41]  S. Stupkiewicz Finite element treatment of soft elastohydrodynamic lubrication problems in the finite deformation regime , 2009 .

[42]  Barbara Wohlmuth,et al.  Stable Lagrange multipliers for quadrilateral meshes of curved interfaces in 3D , 2007 .

[43]  M. Merklein,et al.  Contact pressure-dependent friction characterization by using a single sheet metal compression test , 2021, Wear.

[44]  Wolfgang A. Wall,et al.  A finite deformation mortar contact formulation using a primal–dual active set strategy , 2009 .

[45]  G. Nikas Elastohydrodynamics and Mechanics of Rectangular Elastomeric Seals for Reciprocating Piston Rods , 2003 .

[46]  Peter Betsch,et al.  A mortar method for energy‐momentum conserving schemes in frictionless dynamic contact problems , 2009 .

[47]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics , 2013 .

[48]  Jintai Chung,et al.  A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method , 1993 .

[49]  T. Laursen Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics , 2003 .

[50]  S. Maegawa,et al.  Rate-, state-, and pressure-dependent friction model based on the elastoplastic theory , 2020, Friction.

[51]  Liqun Qi,et al.  A nonsmooth version of Newton's method , 1993, Math. Program..

[52]  B. C. Majumdar,et al.  Fundamentals of Fluid Film Lubrication , 2014 .

[53]  D. Thornton Rate , 2020, EKGs for the Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant.