Circumvention of common labelling artefacts using secondary nanobodies.

A standard procedure to study cellular elements is via immunostaining followed by optical imaging. This methodology typically requires target-specific primary antibodies (1.Abs), which are revealed by secondary antibodies (2.Abs). Unfortunately, the antibody bivalency, polyclonality, and large size can result in a series of artifacts. Alternatively, small, monovalent probes, such as single-domain antibodies (nanobodies) have been suggested to minimize these limitations. The discovery and validation of nanobodies against specific targets are challenging, thus only a minimal amount of them are currently available. Here, we used STED, DNA-PAINT, and light-sheet microscopy, to demonstrate that secondary nanobodies (1) increase localization accuracy compared to 2.Abs; (2) allow direct pre-mixing with 1.Abs before staining, reducing experimental time, and enabling the use of multiple 1.Abs from the same species; (3) penetrate thick tissues more efficiently; and (4) avoid probe-induced clustering of target molecules observed with conventional 2.Abs in living or poorly fixed samples. Altogether, we show how secondary nanobodies are a valuable alternative to 2.Abs.

[1]  Richard Schalek,et al.  Nanobody immunostaining for correlated light and electron microscopy with preservation of ultrastructure , 2018, Nature Methods.

[2]  Edward S Boyden,et al.  Glyoxal as an alternative fixative to formaldehyde in immunostaining and super‐resolution microscopy , 2017, The EMBO journal.

[3]  C. Doe,et al.  Immunofluorescent antibody staining of intact Drosophila larvae , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[4]  R. Jungmann,et al.  Bacterially Derived Antibody Binders as Small Adapters for DNA‐PAINT Microscopy , 2019, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[5]  R. Haugland Coupling of monoclonal antibodies with fluorophores. , 1995, Methods in molecular biology.

[6]  M. McPherson,et al.  Alternative reagents to antibodies in imaging applications , 2017, Biophysical Reviews.

[7]  Maximilian T. Strauss,et al.  Site-Specific Labeling of Affimers for DNA-PAINT Microscopy. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[8]  T. Reese,et al.  Homer is concentrated at the postsynaptic density and does not redistribute after acute synaptic stimulation , 2014, Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Kassis,et al.  Direct visualization of redistribution and capping of fluorescent gangliosides on lymphocytes , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Superresolution Imaging of Chemical Synapses in the Brain , 2010, Neuron.

[11]  Maximilian T. Strauss,et al.  Modified aptamers enable quantitative sub-10-nm cellular DNA-PAINT imaging , 2018, Nature Methods.

[12]  S. Rizzoli,et al.  X10 expansion microscopy enables 25‐nm resolution on conventional microscopes , 2018, EMBO reports.

[13]  S. Mayor,et al.  Sequestration of GPI-anchored proteins in caveolae triggered by cross-linking. , 1994, Science.

[14]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  TrakEM2 Software for Neural Circuit Reconstruction , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Kirby G. Vosburgh,et al.  3D Slicer: A Platform for Subject-Specific Image Analysis, Visualization, and Clinical Support , 2014 .

[16]  Akihiro Kusumi,et al.  Membrane molecules mobile even after chemical fixation , 2010, Nature Methods.

[17]  Maximilian T. Strauss,et al.  124-Color Super-resolution Imaging by Engineering DNA-PAINT Blinking Kinetics , 2019, Nano letters (Print).

[18]  Mark Bates,et al.  A toolbox of anti–mouse and anti–rabbit IgG secondary nanobodies , 2018, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  Mark Bates,et al.  Nanobodies: site-specific labeling for super-resolution imaging, rapid epitope-mapping and native protein complex isolation , 2015, eLife.

[20]  J. Enderlein,et al.  Nanobody Detection of Standard Fluorescent Proteins Enables Multi-Target DNA-PAINT with High Resolution and Minimal Displacement Errors , 2018, bioRxiv.

[21]  Cheuk Y. Tang,et al.  Mapping of Brain Activity by Automated Volume Analysis of Immediate Early Genes , 2016, Cell.

[22]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[24]  M. Trepel,et al.  Differential organization of tonic and chronic B cell antigen receptors in the plasma membrane , 2019, Nature Communications.

[25]  Maximilian T. Strauss,et al.  Nanometer-scale Multiplexed Super-Resolution Imaging with an Economic 3D-DNA-PAINT Microscope. , 2018, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[26]  Peng Yin,et al.  DNA-barcoded labeling probes for highly multiplexed Exchange-PAINT imaging† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6sc05420j Click here for additional data file. , 2017, Chemical science.

[27]  T Ezaki,et al.  Antigen retrieval on formaldehyde-fixed paraffin sections: its potential drawbacks and optimization for double immunostaining. , 2000, Micron.

[28]  Andrew D Ellington,et al.  Aptamers as potential tools for super-resolution microscopy , 2012, Nature Methods.

[29]  Viviana Gradinaru,et al.  Bone CLARITY: Clearing, imaging, and computational analysis of osteoprogenitors within intact bone marrow , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[30]  D. Peckys,et al.  Local variations of HER2 dimerization in breast cancer cells discovered by correlative fluorescence and liquid electron microscopy , 2015, Science Advances.

[31]  H. Scheich,et al.  Presynaptic cytomatrix protein Bassoon is localized at both excitatory and inhibitory synapses of rat brain , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[32]  H. Ewers,et al.  A simple, versatile method for GFP-based super-resolution microscopy via nanobodies , 2012, Nature Methods.

[33]  C. Höbartner,et al.  Aptamers provide superior stainings of cellular receptors studied under super-resolution microscopy , 2017, PloS one.

[34]  S. Rizzoli,et al.  Tools and limitations to study the molecular composition of synapses by fluorescence microscopy. , 2016, The Biochemical journal.

[35]  S. Hell,et al.  MINFLUX monitors rapid molecular jumps with superior spatiotemporal resolution , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Maximilian T. Strauss,et al.  Super-resolution microscopy with DNA-PAINT , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[37]  Lars Kastrup,et al.  Limited Intermixing of Synaptic Vesicle Components upon Vesicle Recycling , 2010, Traffic.