Predicting attitude towards performance enhancing substance use: a comprehensive test of the Sport Drug Control Model with elite Australian athletes.

OBJECTIVES This study presents a comprehensive examination of the Sport Drug Control Model via survey data of elite Australian athletes. DESIGN A cross-sectional nationwide mail survey. METHODS A mail survey of 1237 elite Australian athletes was conducted. Structural equation modelling was employed to test the model. RESULTS Morality (personal moral stance on performance-enhancing substances use), reference group opinion (perceived moral stance of reference group on performance-enhancing substances use) and legitimacy (perceptions of the drug testing and appeals processes) evidenced significant relationships with attitude towards performance-enhancing substances use, which in turn was positively associated with doping behaviour. The model accounted for 81% and 13% of the variance in attitude towards performance-enhancing substances use and doping behaviour, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These findings validate the usefulness of the Sport Drug Control Model for understanding influences on performance-enhancing substances use. Nevertheless, there is a need to survey athletes representing a broader range of competition levels and cross-cultural research to test the model's applicability to other populations of athletes.

[1]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[2]  D. Mottram.  Chapter 25 - Prevalence of drug misuse in sport , 2012 .

[3]  A. Petróczi.  Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy Attitudes and Doping: a Structural Equation Analysis of the Relationship between Athletes' Attitudes, Sport Orientation and Doping Behaviour , 2007 .

[4]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis: Text and Readings , 1979 .

[5]  S. J. Kraus,et al.  Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 1990 .

[6]  Aaron C. T. Smith,et al.  Drug Use in Sport , 2008 .

[7]  R. Donovan.  Towards an understanding of factors influencing athletes’ attitudes towards performance enhancing technologies: implications for ethics education , 2009 .

[8]  R. Meertens,et al.  Measuring an individual's tendency to take risks: The risk propensity scale. , 2008 .

[9]  D. Mottram.  Drugs in Sport , 1988 .

[10]  A. Petróczi,et al.  Measuring explicit attitude toward doping: Review of the psychometric properties of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale , 2009 .

[11]  H. Alho,et al.  Magnesium treatment in alcoholics: a randomized clinical trial , 2008, Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy.

[12]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[13]  F. Lucidi,et al.  The social-cognitive mechanisms regulating adolescents' use of doping substances , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  F. Lucidi,et al.  The contribution of interpersonal appraisals to a social-cognitive analysis of adolescents' doping use , 2010 .

[15]  S. Detmar,et al.  Social psychological determinants of the use of performance-enhancing drugs by gym users. , 2007, Health education research.

[16]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[17]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Randomized response estimates for doping and illicit drug use in elite athletes. , 2010, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[18]  Robert J. Boeckmann,et al.  A new model for understanding performance-enhancing drug use by elite athletes. , 2003 .

[19]  M. Kavussanu,et al.  Development and validation of the moral disengagement in sport scale. , 2007, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[20]  F. Lucidi,et al.  Determinants of the intention to use doping substances: An empirical contribution in a sample of Italian adolescents , 2004 .

[21]  Peter Strelan,et al.  Why drug testing in elite sport does not work: Perceptual deterrence theory and the role of personal moral beliefs , 2006 .

[22]  A. Petróczi,et al.  Psychological drivers in doping: The life-cycle model of performance enhancement , 2008, Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy.

[23]  J. Mazanov,et al.  An empirical model of athlete decisions to use performance‐enhancing drugs: qualitative evidence , 2010 .

[24]  R. Donovan,et al.  An examination of the Sport Drug Control Model with elite Australian athletes. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[25]  Rowena Jacobs,et al.  The taxation of tobacco products , 2001 .

[26]  R. Donovan,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Achieving Performance Enhancing Drug Compliance in Sport , 2002, Sports medicine.

[27]  G. Lippi,et al.  New strategies for doping control , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[28]  P. Anderson.  Global use of alcohol, drugs and tobacco. , 2006, Drug and alcohol review.

[29]  N. Ntoumanis,et al.  Development of the Attitudes to Moral Decision-making in Youth Sport Questionnaire (AMDYSQ). , 2007 .

[30]  Oskar Macgregor.  Performance-enhancing technologies in sports: Ethical, conceptual, and scientific issues , 2010 .

[31]  P. Laure.  Epidemiologic approach of doping in sport. A review. , 1997, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[32]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  Tobacco Control in Developing Countries , 2001 .