Hydrogen purge and reactant feeding strategies in self-humidified PEM fuel cell systems

Abstract A 6 kW proton exchange membrane fuel cell system, operating in self-humidified conditions, was characterized in two anode operative modes: dead-end and flow through with exhaust recirculation. The anode sub-system was specifically designed in order to adjust the level of recycled anodic stream. The role of anode purge frequency, anode recirculation level and air stoichiometric ratio was analysed in the power range 1–5 kW. The aim of this study was to define management strategies to assure efficient and reliable cell performance during steady-state, warm-up and load variation phases. The results evidenced the combined effect of hydrogen purge, air flow rate impulse, and recycled anodic stream on individual cell performance recovery when unstable working conditions were detected during system start-up and load variations.

[1]  Xiaoping Wang,et al.  Buildup of nitrogen in direct hydrogen polymer-electrolyte fuel cell stacks. , 2007 .

[2]  Hengbing Zhao,et al.  Optimization of Fuel Cell System Operating Conditions for Fuel Cell Vehicles , 2008 .

[3]  Fortunato Migliardini,et al.  Optimization of hydrogen feeding procedure in PEM fuel cell systems for transportation , 2014 .

[4]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2000 .

[5]  Rajesh K. Ahluwalia,et al.  Fuel cell systems for transportation: Status and trends , 2008 .

[6]  Mario Paolone,et al.  Experimental analysis of a PEM fuel cell performance at variable load with anodic exhaust management optimization , 2013 .

[7]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Modeling hydrogen starvation conditions in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells , 2011 .

[8]  Qi Li,et al.  Experimental study on the voltage uniformity for dynamic loading of a PEM fuel cell stack , 2015 .

[9]  A. Sasmito,et al.  Investigation of the purging effect on a dead-end anode PEM fuel cell-powered vehicle during segments of a European driving cycle , 2015 .

[10]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang.  Effect of hydrogen delivery schemes on fuel cell efficiency , 2013 .

[11]  P. Rodatz,et al.  Operational aspects of a large PEFC stack under practical conditions , 2004 .

[12]  Jason B. Siegel,et al.  Degradation phenomena in PEM fuel cell with dead-ended anode , 2013 .

[13]  S. Kocha,et al.  Characterization of gas crossover and its implications in PEM fuel cells , 2006 .

[14]  Waldemar Bujalski,et al.  High temperature (HT) polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) – A review , 2013 .

[15]  Fortunato Migliardini,et al.  Experimental comparison between external and internal humidification in proton exchange membrane fuel cells for road vehicles , 2015 .

[16]  Bosung Kim,et al.  An experimental study on water transport through the membrane of a PEFC operating in the dead-end mode , 2009 .

[17]  Tolga Taner,et al.  Alternative Energy of the Future: A Technical Note of PEM Fuel Cell WaterManagement , 2015 .

[18]  Jason B. Siegel,et al.  Carbon Corrosion in PEM Fuel Cell Dead-Ended Anode Operations , 2011 .

[19]  Agus P. Sasmito,et al.  Effect of operating parameters on the transient performance of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack with a dead-end anode , 2014 .

[20]  Martin S. Miller,et al.  A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack testing , 2011 .

[21]  Agus P. Sasmito,et al.  A Factorial Study to Investigate the Purging Effect on the Performance of a Dead‐End Anode PEM Fuel Cell Stack , 2015 .

[22]  K. Chaitanya,et al.  A novel reconfigurable hybrid system for fuel cell system , 2015 .

[23]  Omar Z. Sharaf,et al.  An overview of fuel cell technology: Fundamentals and applications , 2014 .

[24]  Jason B. Siegel,et al.  Optimization of Purge Cycle for Dead-Ended Anode Fuel Cell Operation , 2012 .

[25]  Seddik Bacha,et al.  PEM fuel cell/battery storage system supplying electric vehicle. , 2016 .