A Comparison of Rotordynamic-Coefficient Predictions for Annular Honeycomb Gas Seals Using Three Different Friction-Factor Models

A two-control-volume bulk-flow model is used to predict rotordynamic coefficients for an annular, honeycomb-stator/smooth-rotor gas seal. The bulk-flow model uses Hirs' turbulent-lubrication model, which requires a friction factor model to define the shear stresses at the rotor and stator wall. Rotordynamic coefficients predictions are compared for the following three variations of the Blasius pipe-friction model: (i) a basic model where the Reynolds number is a linear function of the local clearance, f s =n s Re m s (ii) a model where the coefficient is a function of the local clearance, and (iii) a model where both the coefficient and exponent are functions of the local clearance. The latter models are based on data that shows the friction factor increasing with increasing clearances. Rotordynamic-coefficient predictions shows that the friction-factor-model choice is important in predicting the effective-damping coefficients at a lower frequency range (60∼70 Hz) where industrial centrifugal compressors and steam turbines tend to become unstable. At a higher frequency range, irrespective of the friction-factor model, the rotordynamic-coefficient predictions tend to coincide. Blasius-based Models which directly account for the observed increase in stator friction factors with increasing clearance predict significantly lower values for the destabilizing cross-coupled stiffness coefficients.

[1]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  Vibration characteristics of the HPOTP (high-pressure oxygen turbopump) of the SSME (space shuttle main engine) , 1985 .

[2]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  An Entrance Region Friction Factor Model Applied to Annular Seal Analysis: Theory Versus Experiment for Smooth and Honeycomb Seals , 1989 .

[3]  H. Blasius,et al.  Das Aehnlichkeitsgesetz bei Reibungsvorgängen in Flüssigkeiten , 1913 .

[4]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  The Acoustic Influence of Cell Depth on the Rotordynamic Characteristics of Smooth-Rotor/Honeycomb-Stator Annular Gas Seals , 1996 .

[5]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  A New Friction Factor Model and Entrance Loss Coefficient for Honeycomb Annular Gas Seals , 2000 .

[6]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  Turbomachinery Rotordynamics: Phenomena, Modeling, and Analysis , 1993 .

[7]  C. C. Nelson Rotordynamic coefficients for compressible flow in tapered annular seals , 1985 .

[8]  G. G. Hirs A Bulk-Flow Theory for Turbulence in Lubricant Films , 1973 .

[9]  Robert X. Perez,et al.  The Use Of Honeycomb Seals In Stabilizing Two Centrifugal Compressors. , 1993 .

[10]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  Annular Honeycomb-Stator Turbulent Gas Seal Analysis Using a New Friction-Factor Model Based on Flat Plate Tests , 1994 .

[11]  Dara W. Childs,et al.  An annular gas seal analysis using empirical entrance and exit region friction factors , 1990 .

[12]  Jay Armstrong,et al.  Turbine Instability Solution-Honeycomb Seals. , 1996 .

[13]  Patrice Fayolle,et al.  Test Results for Liquid “Damper” Seals Using a Round-Hole Roughness Pattern for the Stators , 1999 .