Multi-Site Meta-Analysis of Morphometry

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) link full genome data to a handful of traits. However, in neuroimaging studies, there is an almost unlimited number of traits that can be extracted for full image-wide big data analyses. Large populations are needed to achieve the necessary power to detect statistically significant effects, emphasizing the need to pool data across multiple studies. Neuroimaging consortia, e.g., ENIGMA and CHARGE, are now analyzing MRI data from over 30,000 individuals. Distributed processing protocols extract harmonized features at each site, and pool together only the cohort statistics using meta analysis to avoid data sharing. To date, such MRI projects have focused on single measures such as hippocampal volume, yet voxelwise analyses (e.g., tensor-based morphometry; TBM) may help better localize statistical effects. This can lead to $10^{13}$1013 tests for GWAS and become underpowered. We developed an analytical framework for multi-site TBM by performing multi-channel registration to cohort-specific templates. Our results highlight the reliability of the method and the added power over alternative options while preserving single site specificity and opening the doors for well-powered image-wide genome-wide discoveries.

[1]  Wiro J Niessen,et al.  Common variants at 6q22 and 17q21 are associated with intracranial volume , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[2]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited , 2012, NeuroImage.

[3]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Yi-Yu Chou,et al.  Sex differences in brain structure in auditory and cingulate regions , 2009, Neuroreport.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields , 2009, NeuroImage.

[6]  Arno Klein,et al.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Comparison of template registration methods for multi-site meta-analysis of brain morphometry , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[9]  Michael Weiner,et al.  Unbiased tensor-based morphometry: Improved robustness and sample size estimates for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials , 2013, NeuroImage.

[10]  Pradeep Reddy Raamana,et al.  An investigation of cortical thickness and antidepressant response in major depressive disorder: A CAN-BIND study report , 2020, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[11]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Image-based vs. Coordinate-based Meta-analysis , 2009, NeuroImage.

[12]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures , 2015, Nature.

[13]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews a Meta-analysis of Sex Differences in Human Brain Structure , 2022 .