Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: A decision-analytic model and cost-effectiveness analysis

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a decision-analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), relative to nonsurgical conventional medical management (CMM), for patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Methods: A decision tree and Markov model were developed to synthesize evidence on both health-care costs and outcomes for patients with FBSS. Outcome data of SCS and CMM were sourced from 2-year follow-up data of two randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Treatment effects were measured as levels of pain relief. Short- and long-term health-care costs were obtained from a detailed Canadian costing study in FBSS patients. Results are presented as incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and expressed in 2003 Euros. Costs were discounted at 6 percent and outcomes at 1.5 percent. Results: Over the lifetime of the patient, SCS was dominant (i.e., SCS is cost-saving and gives more health gain relative to CMM); a finding that was robust across sensitivity analyses. At a 2-year time horizon, SCS gave more health gain but at an increased cost relative to CMM. Given the uncertainty in effectiveness and cost parameters, the 2-year cost-effectiveness of SCS ranged from €30,370 in the base case to €63,511 in the worst-case scenario. Conclusions: SCS was found to be both more effective and less costly than CMM, over the lifetime of a patient. In the short-term, although SCS is potentially cost-effective, the model results are highly sensitive to the choice of input parameters. Further empirical data are required to improve the precision in the estimation of short-term cost-effectiveness.

[1]  M. van Kleef,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation for chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy--five-year follow-up. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  T. Albert,et al.  Differences in the Work-Up and Treatment of Conditions Associated With Low Back Pain by Patient Gender and Ethnic Background , 2005, Spine.

[3]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Repeated Lumbosacral Spine Surgery for Chronic Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[4]  E. Buchser,et al.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Prognostic Factors , 2005, Spine.

[5]  Richard North,et al.  The cost effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of pain: a systematic review of the literature. , 2004, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[6]  R. Deyo,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications , 2004, Pain.

[7]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  M. Drummond,et al.  Use of pharmacoeconomics information--report of the ISPOR Task Force on use of pharmacoeconomic/health economic information in health-care decision making. , 2003, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[9]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Krishna Kumar,et al.  Treatment of Chronic Pain with Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Alternative Therapies: Cost-effectiveness Analysis , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[11]  R. Deyo,et al.  The practicality and validity of directly elicited and SF-36 derived health state preferences in patients with low back pain. , 2002, Health economics.

[12]  J Raftery,et al.  NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  A. Nordwall,et al.  2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar Fusion Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial From the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group , 2001, Spine.

[14]  A. Garratt,et al.  Responsiveness of Generic and Specific Measures of Health Outcome in Low Back Pain , 2001, Spine.

[15]  D. Kendrick,et al.  The role of radiography in primary care patients with low back pain of at least 6 weeks duration: a randomised (unblinded) controlled trial. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[16]  H C de Vet,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. K. Snider,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. , 2000, Spine.

[18]  S D Walter,et al.  The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  Ruth E. Brown,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of long-term intrathecal morphine therapy for pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome. , 1997, Clinical therapeutics.

[20]  R. Deyo,et al.  Cost‐Effectiveness of Lumbar Discectomy for the Treatment of Herniated Intervertebral Disc , 1996, Spine.

[21]  A Briggs,et al.  Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: a review of published studies. , 1995, Health economics.

[22]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: a prospective, randomized study design. , 1995, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[23]  J. Gybels,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation in Belgium: A nation-wide survey on the incidence, indications and therapeutic efficacy by the health insurer , 1994, Pain.

[24]  R. North,et al.  A prospective, randomized study of spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: initial results. , 1994, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[25]  R. Klein,et al.  The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.