Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis of Infarct‐Related and Non‐Infarct‐Related Arteries in Patients Who Presented With an Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background Previous studies have reported diffuse destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods and Results We used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to assess 78 coronary arteries (38 infarct‐related arteries [IRAs] with culprit and nonculprit lesions and 40 non‐IRAs) from 38 consecutive AMI patients. IVUS analysis included qualitative and quantitative measurements of reference and lesion external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen, and plaque plus media (P&M) area. Positive remodeling was defined as lesion/mean reference EEM>1.0. Culprit lesions were identified by a combination of ECG, wall motion abnormalities (ventriculogram or echocardiogram), scintigraphic perfusion defects, and coronary angiogram. Culprit lesions contained more thrombus (23.7% versus 3.4% in nonculprit IRA plaques and 3.1% in non‐IRA plaques; P<0.0011). Culprit lesions were predominantly hypoechoic (63.2% versus 37.9% of nonculprit IRA plaques and 28.1% of non‐IRA plaques; P=0.0022). Culprit lesions were longer (17.5±10.1, 9.8±4.0, and 10.3±5.7 mm, respectively; P<0.0001), had larger EEM area (15.0±6.0, 11.5±5.7, and 12.6±5.6 mm2, respectively; P±0.0353) and P&M area (13.0±6.0, 7.5±3.7, 9.3±4.3 mm2, respectively; P<0.0001), smaller lumens (2.0±0.9,4.1±3.1, and 3.4±2.5mm2, respectively; P=0.0009), and more positive remodeling (79.4%, 59.0%, and 50.8%, respectively; P=0.0155). The frequency of plaque rupture/dissection was greater in culprit, nonculprit IRA, and non‐IRA plaques in AMI patients than in a control group of chronic stable angina patients with multivessel IVUS imaging. Conclusions Culprit plaques have more markers of instability (thrombus, positive remodeling, and large plaque mass); however, these markers of instability are not typically found elsewhere. This suggests that the vascular event in AMI patients is determined by local pre‐event lesion morphologies. (Circulation. 2003;107:2889‐2893.)

[1]  Y. Nishibori,et al.  Lesion characteristics of acute myocardial infarction: an investigation with intravascular ultrasound , 2001, Heart.

[2]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  Morphologic and angiographic features of coronary plaque rupture detected by intravascular ultrasound. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  G Finet,et al.  Multiple Atherosclerotic Plaque Rupture in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Three-Vessel Intravascular Ultrasound Study , 2002, Circulation.

[4]  Michael C. Fishbein,et al.  Histopathologic Validation of Angioscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound , 1991, Circulation.

[5]  E. Gronenschild,et al.  CAAS. II: A second generation system for off-line and on-line quantitative coronary angiography. , 1994, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[6]  C von Birgelen,et al.  Clinical application and image interpretation in intracoronary ultrasound. Study Group on Intracoronary Imaging of the Working Group of Coronary Circulation and of the Subgroup on Intravascular Ultrasound of the Working Group of Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology. , 1998, European heart journal.

[7]  M J Davies,et al.  Plaque fissuring--the cause of acute myocardial infarction, sudden ischaemic death, and crescendo angina. , 1985, British heart journal.

[8]  C von Birgelen,et al.  Plaque distribution and vascular remodeling of ruptured and nonruptured coronary plaques in the same vessel: an intravascular ultrasound study in vivo. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  A. Yeung,et al.  Impact of coronary artery remodeling on clinical presentation of coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  S E Nissen,et al.  Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes : an intravascular ultrasound study. , 2000, Circulation.

[11]  M. Hori,et al.  Extensive development of vulnerable plaques as a pan-coronary process in patients with myocardial infarction: an angioscopic study. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  N. Weissman,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound findings in patients with acute coronary syndromes with and without elevated troponin I level. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Clinical application and image interpretation in intracoronary ultrasound , 1998 .

[14]  C. Tracy,et al.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  G. Mintz,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the morphologic similarities between stenoses located in different arteries in the same patient. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  G. Pasterkamp,et al.  Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Virmani,et al.  Coronary plaque erosion without rupture into a lipid core. A frequent cause of coronary thrombosis in sudden coronary death. , 1996, Circulation.