Evaluation of the credibility of internet shopping in the UK

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the credibility of internet shopping. Credibility, which refers to the believability of information, is an important consideration of internet shopping.Design/methodology/approach – The evaluation is conducted by incorporating Fogg's 10 Stanford Guidelines for Web Credibility into Nielsen's heuristic evaluation. Furthermore, security and individualisation are considered as additional heuristics. Evaluation criteria are developed based on these 12 heuristics. Three UK car insurance web sites are selected for evaluation, including the AA, Norwich Union and Tesco.Findings – The results show that the Norwich Union site seems to be the most credible while the Tesco site appears to be the least credible. The most significant credibility problems are found to lie in the areas of “trustworthiness”, “expertise” and “real‐world feel”. In other words, these three areas are key issues for future improvement of these sites.Originality/value – This paper contributes to ...

[1]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics , 1994, CHI '94.

[2]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[3]  Christy M. K. Cheung,et al.  Understanding consumer trust in Internet shopping: A multidisciplinary approach , 2006 .

[4]  Xiaoying Dong.  Searching Information and Evaluation of Internet: A Chinese Academic User Survey , 2003 .

[5]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  The assessment of usability of electronic shopping: A heuristic evaluation , 2005, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[6]  France Bélanger,et al.  Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: the role of privacy, security, and site attributes , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[7]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Elements that affect web credibility: early results from a self-report study , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification , 2007 .

[9]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  A graph model for E-commerce recommender systems , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Web credibility research: a method for online experiments and early study results , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Factors of Information Credibility for an Internet Advice Site , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[12]  D. R. Danielson,et al.  How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants , 2003, DUX '03.

[13]  Misha W. Vaughan,et al.  The bull's-eye: a framework for web application user interface design guidelines , 2003, CHI '03.

[14]  J. Walther,et al.  The Effect of Top-Level Domains and Advertisements on Health Web Site Credibility , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[16]  Paul H. P. Yeow,et al.  Key usability factors of service-oriented web sites for students: an empirical study , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[17]  Florian N. Egger,et al.  "Trust me, I'm an online vendor": towards a model of trust for e-commerce system design , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Chang Liu,et al.  Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Elizabeth Sillence,et al.  Trust and mistrust of online health sites , 2004, CHI.

[23]  David Robins,et al.  Aesthetics and credibility in web site design , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..