Intraspecific and interspecific competition induces density‐dependent habitat niche shifts in an endangered steppe bird

Abstract Interspecific competition is a dominant force in animal communities that induces niche shifts in ecological and evolutionary time. If competition occurs, niche expansion can be expected when the competitor disappears because resources previously inaccessible due to competitive constraints can then be exploited (i.e., ecological release). Here, we aimed to determine the potential effects of interspecific competition between the little bustard (Tetrax tetrax) and the great bustard (Otis tarda) using a multidimensional niche approach with habitat distribution data. We explored whether the degree of niche overlap between the species was a density‐dependent function of interspecific competition. We then looked for evidences of ecological release by comparing measures of niche breadth and position of the little bustard between allopatric and sympatric situations. Furthermore, we evaluated whether niche shifts could depend not only on the presence of great bustard but also on the density of little and great bustards. The habitat niches of these bustard species partially overlapped when co‐occurring, but we found no relationship between degree of overlap and great bustard density. In the presence of the competitor, little bustard's niche was displaced toward increased use of the species' primary habitat. Little bustard's niche breadth decreased proportionally with great bustard density in sympatric sites, in consistence with theory. Overall, our results suggest that density‐dependent variation in little bustard's niche is the outcome of interspecific competition with the great bustard. The use of computational tools like kernel density estimators to obtain multidimensional niches should bring novel insights on how species' ecological niches behave under the effects of interspecific competition in ecological communities.

[1]  J. Traba,et al.  Resource partitioning and niche segregation in a steppe bird assemblage , 2015 .

[2]  J. C. de Almeida,et al.  Concluding Remarks , 2015, Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH.

[3]  F. Suárez,et al.  Niche-habitat mechanisms and biotic interactions explain the coexistence and abundance of congeneric sandgrouse species , 2014, Oecologia.

[4]  B. Enquist,et al.  The n‐dimensional hypervolume , 2014 .

[5]  J. Traba,et al.  Are Species Coexistence Areas a Good Option for Conservation Management? Applications from Fine Scale Modelling in Two Steppe Birds , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  G. Bota,et al.  Not Only Habitat But Also Sex: Factors Affecting Spatial Distribution of Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax Families , 2013 .

[7]  J. Traba,et al.  The Use of Fallows by Nesting Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax Females: Implications for Conservation in Mosaic Cereal Farmland , 2013 .

[8]  G. Bota,et al.  Ranging behaviour of little bustard males, Tetrax tetrax, in the lekking grounds , 2012, Behavioural Processes.

[9]  M. Fortin,et al.  Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data , 2012 .

[10]  B. Petitpierre,et al.  Climatic Niche Shifts Are Rare Among Terrestrial Plant Invaders , 2012, Science.

[11]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Relating Habitat and Climatic Niches in Birds , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  S. Pledger,et al.  A unified analysis of niche overlap incorporating data of different types , 2011 .

[13]  M. Morales,et al.  Local differences in habitat selection by Great Bustards Otis tarda in changing agricultural landscapes: implications for farmland bird conservation , 2010, Bird Conservation International.

[14]  J. Traba,et al.  Habitat Selection and Density-Dependent Relationships in Spatial Occupancy by Male Little Bustards Tetrax tetrax , 2010 .

[15]  T. Duong,et al.  Multivariate plug-in bandwidth selection with unconstrained pilot bandwidth matrices , 2010 .

[16]  S. Chiba,et al.  Interspecific interference competition alters habitat use patterns in two species of land snails , 2010, Evolutionary Ecology.

[17]  C. Palacín,et al.  The world status and population trends of the Great Bustard (Otis tarda): 2010 update , 2010 .

[18]  William E. Stutz,et al.  Ecological release from interspecific competition leads to decoupled changes in population and individual niche width , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  J. Traba,et al.  Sexual differences in microhabitat selection of breeding little bustards Tetrax tetrax: Ecological segregation based on vegetation structure , 2008 .

[20]  M. Araújo,et al.  Can vulnerability among British bumblebee (Bombus) species be explained by niche position and breadth , 2007 .

[21]  Daniel I Bolnick,et al.  Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  D. Mouillot,et al.  Niche overlap estimates based on quantitative functional traits: a new family of non-parametric indices , 2005, Oecologia.

[23]  B. Arroyo,et al.  Can landscape composition changes predict spatial and annual variation of little bustard male abundance? , 2005 .

[24]  D. Adams CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT VIA AGGRESSIVE INTERFERENCE IN APPALACHIAN SALAMANDERS , 2004 .

[25]  C. Palacín,et al.  Distribution dynamics of a great bustard metapopulation throughout a decade: influence of conspecific attraction and recruitment , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[26]  M. Cadotte Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[27]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Competition between Eurasian otter Lutra lutra and American mink Mustela vison probed by niche shift , 2004 .

[28]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection , 2003, Oecologia.

[29]  M. Wink,et al.  A mtDNA phylogeny of bustards (family Otididae) based on nucleotide sequences of the cytochromeb-gene , 2003, Journal für Ornithologie.

[30]  M. Wink,et al.  A mtDNA phylogeny of bustards (family Otididae) based on nucleotide sequences of the cytochrome b-gene , 2003 .

[31]  Jean-Louis Martin,et al.  The benefits of extensive agriculture to birds: the case of the little bustard , 2001 .

[32]  D. Bolnick Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster , 2001, Nature.

[33]  Juan C. Alonso,et al.  Habitat preferences of great bustard Otis tarda flocks in the arable steppes of central Spain: are potentially suitable areas unoccupied? , 2001 .

[34]  R. Stine,et al.  Non-parametric estimates of overlap. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Lek mating systems: a case study in the Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[36]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES IN HABITAT USE: AVAILABILITY INFLUENCES RELATIVE USE IN TRADE-OFF SITUATIONS , 1998 .

[37]  D. Gordon,et al.  Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species , 1996, Oecologia.

[38]  M. A. Leibold The Niche Concept Revisited: Mechanistic Models and Community Context , 1995 .

[39]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[40]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  A need for niches? , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  D. Morris Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure , 1988, Evolutionary Ecology.

[42]  T. Schoener The Controversy over Interspecific Competition , 1982 .

[43]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  A Theory of Habitat Selection , 1981 .

[44]  J. Connell Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past , 1980 .

[45]  B. Grant,et al.  Seasonal Variation in Feeding Habits of Darwin's Ground Finches , 1978 .

[46]  C. Perrins,et al.  Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978, Nature.

[47]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Interference competition and niche theory. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  E. Pianka,et al.  Niche overlap and diffuse competition. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  R M May,et al.  Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  K. Strøm The Ecological Niche , 1946, Nature.

[51]  P. J. Hughesdon The Struggle for Existence , 1927, Nature.

[52]  J. Traba,et al.  Isodars unveil asymmetric effects on habitat use caused by competition between two endangered species , 2017 .

[53]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[54]  J. Losos,et al.  Supplementary Materials for Rapid evolution of a native species following invasion by a congener , 2014 .

[55]  J. Kralj Great Bustard Otis tarda , 2013 .

[56]  D. Morris Apparent predation risk: tests of habitat selection theory reveal unexpected effects of competition , 2009 .

[57]  K. Young ASYMMETRIC COMPETITION, HABITAT SELECTION, AND NICHE OVERLAP IN JUVENILE SALMONIDS , 2004 .

[58]  D. Morris Has the ghost of competition passed , 1999 .

[59]  G. Gauze The struggle for existence, by G. F. Gause. , 1934 .