Diffusion dynamics in small-world networks with heterogeneous consumers

Diffusions of new products and technologies through social networks can be formalized as spreading of infectious diseases. However, while epidemiological models describe infection in terms of transmissibility, we propose a diffusion model that explicitly includes consumer decision-making affected by social influences and word-of-mouth processes. In our agent-based model consumers’ probability of adoption depends on the external marketing effort and on the internal influence that each consumer perceives in his/her personal networks. Maintaining a given marketing effort and assuming its effect on the probability of adoption as linear, we can study how social processes affect diffusion dynamics and how the speed of the diffusion depends on the network structure and on consumer heterogeneity. First, we show that the speed of diffusion changes with the degree of randomness in the network. In markets with high social influence and in which consumers have a sufficiently large local network, the speed is low in regular networks, it increases in small-world networks and, contrarily to what epidemic models suggest, it becomes very low again in random networks. Second, we show that heterogeneity helps the diffusion. Ceteris paribus and varying the degree of heterogeneity in the population of agents simulation results show that the more heterogeneous the population, the faster the speed of the diffusion. These results can contribute to the development of marketing strategies for the launch and the dissemination of new products and technologies, especially in turbulent and fashionable markets.

[1]  LevinthalDaniel,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution , 2001 .

[2]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models in Marketing , 1979 .

[3]  D. Watts,et al.  A generalized model of social and biological contagion. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  S. Solomon,et al.  Social percolation models , 1999, adap-org/9909001.

[5]  Roland Soong,et al.  Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand , 1986 .

[6]  M. Macy Chains of Cooperation: Threshold Effects in Collective Action , 1991 .

[7]  M. Newman,et al.  Scaling and percolation in the small-world network model. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[8]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogeneous Population: A Micromodeling Approach , 1990 .

[9]  S. Redner,et al.  Introduction To Percolation Theory , 2018 .

[10]  T. Valente Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[11]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[12]  M. Newman Spread of epidemic disease on networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  T. Valente,et al.  Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1995, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[14]  G. Marwell,et al.  THE PARADOX OF GROUP SIZE IN COLLECTIVE ACTION: A THEORY OF THE CRITICAL MASS. II. * , 1988 .

[15]  A. Arenas,et al.  Self-organized evolution in a socioeconomic environment. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[16]  A DelreSebastiano,et al.  Diffusion dynamics in small-world networks with heterogeneous consumers , 2007 .

[17]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic dynamics in finite size scale-free networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  G. Marwell,et al.  A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  G. Breeuwsma Geruchten als besmettelijke ziekte. Het succesverhaal van de Hush Puppies. Bespreking van Malcolm Gladwell, The tipping point. How little things can make a big difference. London: Little, Brown and Company, 2000 , 2000 .

[20]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[21]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[22]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Thomas W. Valente Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[24]  L. Anderlini,et al.  Path Dependence and Learning from Neighbors , 1996 .

[25]  Glenn Ellison Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination , 1993 .

[26]  H. Young,et al.  The Evolution of Conventions , 1993 .

[27]  Albert C. BemmaorJanghyuk Lee Research Note The Impact of Heterogeneity and Ill-Conditioning on Diffusion Model Parameter Estimates , 2002 .

[28]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  Learning Theory and the Logic of Critical Mass , 1990 .

[29]  E. Katz The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis , 1957 .

[30]  In Ho Lee,et al.  Noisy Contagion Without Mutation , 2000 .

[31]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[32]  D. Meadows-Klue The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[33]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[34]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. , 1982 .

[36]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[37]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[38]  F. Bass A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[39]  M. Newman,et al.  Epidemics and percolation in small-world networks. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[40]  Christine T. Ennew,et al.  Managing word of mouth communication: empirical evidence from India , 2000 .

[41]  E. Rosen The Anatomy of Buzz , 2000 .

[42]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth , 2001 .

[43]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  Marketing Percolation , 2000, cond-mat/0005426.

[44]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[45]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[46]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[47]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Gérard Weisbuch,et al.  Hits and flops dynamics , 2000 .

[49]  G. Marwell,et al.  Social Networks and Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. III , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  Marco Janssen,et al.  Simulating Market Dynamics: Interactions between Consumer Psychology and Social Networks , 2003, Artificial Life.

[51]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Chapter 8 New-product diffusion models , 1993, Marketing.

[53]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .