Computer-Mediated Inter-Organizational Knowledge-Sharing: Insights from a Virtual Team Innovating Using a Collaborative Tool

How does a team use a computer-mediated technology to share and reuse knowledge when the team is inter-organizational and virtual, when the team must compete for the attention of team members with collocated teams, and when the task is the creation of a completely new innovation? From a review of the literature on knowledge sharing and reuse using collaborative tools, three propositions are generated about the likely behavior of the team in using the collaborative tool and reusing the knowledge put in the knowledge repository. A multi-method longitudinal research study of this design team was conducted over their ten-month design effort. Both qualitative and quantitative data were obtained. Results indicated that the propositions from the literature were insufficient to explain the behavior of the team. We found that ambiguity of the task does not determine use of a collaborative tool; that tool use does not increase with experience; and that knowledge that is perceived as transient whether it really is transient or not is unlikely to be referenced properly for later search and retrieval. Implications for practice and theory are discussed.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[3]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[4]  Constance Perin,et al.  Electronic social fields in bureaucracies , 1991, CACM.

[5]  Rob Kling,et al.  Cooperation, coordination and control in computer-supported work , 1991, CACM.

[6]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment , 1995 .

[7]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Asynchronous Technologies in Small Face‐to‐Face Groups , 1992 .

[8]  T. R. Davis,et al.  The influence of the physical environment in offices. , 1985, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[9]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological informat , 1977 .

[10]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams , 1988 .

[11]  E. B. Kerr.  Electronic leadership: A guide to moderating online conferences , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[12]  Daniel E. Atkins,et al.  Supporting collaboration with advanced multimedia electronic mail: the NSF EXPRES project , 1990 .

[13]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Intelligent Information Sharing Systems , 1986 .

[14]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Groupware: some issues and experiences , 1991, CACM.

[15]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[16]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Iterative design of seamless collaboration media , 1994, CACM.

[17]  R. Rice,et al.  The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. , 1984 .

[18]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[19]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Support Systems: New Perspectives , 1992 .

[20]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  Faltering from ethnography to design , 1992, CSCW '92.

[21]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.

[22]  Susan F. Ehrlich,et al.  Strategies for encouraging successful adoption of office communication systems , 1987, TOIS.

[23]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[24]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[25]  Suzanne Lacy,et al.  Group Think , 2014, PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art.

[26]  R. Kraut,et al.  Varieties of Social Influence: the Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium , 1998 .

[27]  R. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: The Social and Technological Bases of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[28]  Jack William Jones,et al.  Temporal Sequences in Information Acquisition for Decision Making: A Focus on Source and Medium , 1990 .

[29]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision‐making Performance of Computer‐Supported Groups* , 1994 .

[30]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness , 1990 .

[31]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Creating Knowledge through Collaboration , 1996 .

[32]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems: ten years of lessons learned , 1995 .

[33]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Making work visible , 1995, CACM.

[34]  R. Rice.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation , 1987 .

[35]  T. Davenport,et al.  Improving Knowledge Work Processes , 1996 .

[36]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[37]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[39]  W. D. Garvey.  Communication, the essence of science , 1979 .

[40]  Tora K. Bikson,et al.  Work group structures and computer support: a field experiment , 1988, TOIS.

[41]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Architecture, Design and Development of an HTML/JavaScript Web-Based Group Support System , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[42]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organization of Organizational Interfaces. , 1988 .

[43]  C. Handy.  Trust and the virtual organization , 1999 .

[44]  Stewart L. Tubbs,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication. , 1988 .

[45]  Gene Allen,et al.  Collaborative R&D: Manufacturing's New Tool , 1999 .

[46]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[47]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[48]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[49]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[50]  J Hibbard.  Knowing what we know , 1997 .

[51]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Technology for intellectual teamwork: perspectives on research and design , 1990 .

[52]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[53]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[54]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Scholarship and practice: the contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[55]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Concurrent engineering tools: are the human issues being ignored? , 1996 .

[56]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Technology and groups: assessments of the empirical research , 1990 .

[57]  Simon J. Gibbs,et al.  LIZA: an extensible groupware toolkit , 1989, CHI '89.

[58]  D. Gerwin,et al.  Withdrawal of team autonomy during concurrent engineering , 1997 .

[59]  M. Schrage.  Shared Minds: The New Technologies of Collaboration , 1990 .