Surprises are the benefits: reframing in multidisciplinary design teams

This paper explores the social dimension of collaborative design from the perspective of Schon's reflective practice. An in-depth video protocol study was performed on the reflective practice in an experienced design team. It looks, in particular, at reframing: the process to find a new productive frame for subsequent activities. Reframing processes are amplified in a social context, requiring considerable time and effort on the part of design teams. Reframing has distinctive features that set it apart from other steps of reflective practice. Two iterative stages are discerned: sensemaking, to reconstruct prior operating frames; and future framing, to design a frame for future activities. Surprises incite reframing, and we argue that surprises are a source for team learning and innovation.

[1]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[2]  Robin Adams,et al.  What Does it Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals' Experiences , 2012 .

[3]  Timo Hartmann,et al.  Managing the process of interdisciplinary design: identifying, enforcing, and anticipating decision-making frames , 2013 .

[4]  C. H. Dorst,et al.  Understanding problem framing through research into metaphors , 2015 .

[5]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[6]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[7]  Willemien Visser,et al.  Design: One, but in different forms , 2007, ArXiv.

[8]  Salu Ylirisku,et al.  Framing design in the third paradigm , 2009, CHI.

[9]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[10]  C. H. Dorst,et al.  Describing Design - A comparison of paradigms , 1997 .

[11]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[12]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[13]  Tim Brown,et al.  Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation , 2009 .

[14]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Revising the past (while thinking in the future perfect tense) , 2002 .

[15]  Thomas Kvan,et al.  An Analysis of Problem Framing in Multiple Settings , 2004 .

[16]  Lucy Kimbell,et al.  Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I , 2011 .

[17]  Gary Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: A Macrocognitive Model , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[18]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[19]  S. Stumpf,et al.  Talking about team framing: using argumentation to analyse and support experiential learning in early design episodes , 2002 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[21]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[22]  Terrence E. Deal,et al.  Making Sense of Organizations , 2017 .

[23]  A. Dong,et al.  Investigating design cognition in the construction and enactment of team mental models , 2013 .

[24]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  An Ecological Perspective on Team Cognition , 2004 .

[26]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[27]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[28]  Roger Martin.  The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage , 2009 .

[29]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  What Problem Are We Solving? Encouraging Idea Generation and Effective Team Communication , 2015 .

[30]  Donald A. Schön.  Problems, frames and perspectives on designing , 1984 .

[31]  Salu Ylirisku,et al.  Frame it simple! : towards a theory of conceptual designing , 2013 .

[32]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[33]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[34]  Helen Sharp,et al.  Framing Behaviours in Novice Interaction Designers , 2015 .

[35]  Ac Rianne Valkenburg,et al.  The reflective practice of design teams , 1998 .

[36]  Kees Dorst,et al.  The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application , 2011 .

[37]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[38]  Porismita Borah,et al.  Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade's Literature , 2011 .

[39]  Gary Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Sensemaking 1: Alternative Perspectives , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[40]  Sara L. Beckman,et al.  Framing Innovation: Negotiating Shared Frames During Early Design Phases , 2007 .

[41]  Robin Adams,et al.  Being a professional: Three lenses into design thinking, acting, and being , 2011 .

[42]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[43]  Tua Björklund,et al.  Initial mental representations of design problems: Differences between experts and novices , 2013 .

[44]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[45]  Colleen M. Seifert,et al.  Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design , 2011 .

[46]  A. C. Valkenburg.  The reflective practice in product design teams , 2000 .

[47]  Kees Dorst,et al.  Briefing and reframing: A situated practice , 2011 .

[48]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[49]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  The quality of group tacit knowledge , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  On Weick: An Appreciation , 2006 .

[51]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Educating effective engineering designers: the role of reflective practice , 2003 .

[52]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[53]  Marlys K. Christianson,et al.  Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward , 2014 .

[54]  Marty Neumeier,et al.  The Designful Company: How to build a culture of nonstop innovation , 2008 .

[55]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[56]  H. Tsoukas.  The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .