The Role of University Spinout Companies in an Emerging Technology: The Case of Nanotechnology

This study examines the role of university spin-out (USO) companies in the emergence of a new technology, in our case nanotechnology. Three unique data-sets based on patents, co-publications, and firm data pertaining to the unfolding field of nanotechnology in the UK were developed. Subsequent analysis suggests that USOs play an important though not a dominant role. Furthermore, the results indicate that USOs in certain subfields of nanotechnology do not have a strong and growing proprietary technology base, raising questions about the commercial sustainability of these ventures. Overall, we observed that USOs are important contributors to technological change in specific subfields of nanotechnology, but that other actors, notably, large firms and (non-university affiliated) new technology-based firms are even more significant agents of technological change.

[1]  Mike Wright,et al.  Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies , 2004 .

[2]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[3]  Richard A. L. Jones,et al.  The Social and Economic Challenges of Nanotechnology , 2003 .

[4]  C. Palmberg.  The transfer and commercialisation of nanotechnology: a comparative analysis of university and company researchers , 2008 .

[5]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[6]  M. Meyer.  Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? research–based ventures and public support mechanisms , 2003 .

[7]  P. Cooke,et al.  The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation , 2000 .

[8]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  University Patenting and its Effects on Academic Research , 2003 .

[9]  Scott Shane,et al.  Executive Forum: University technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies , 2002 .

[10]  Olle Persson,et al.  Mapping excellence in nanotechnologies. Preparatory study for the European Commission, DG Research. , 2002 .

[11]  A. Franks.  REVIEW ARTICLE: Nanotechnology , 1987 .

[12]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[13]  J. Nesheim.  High Tech Start Up : The Complete Handbook For Creating Successful New High Tech Companies , 1992 .

[14]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs in high technology : lessons from MIT and beyond , 1991 .

[15]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[16]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[17]  Michel Ferrary,et al.  Managing the disruptive technologies life cycle by externalising the research: social network and corporate venturing in the Silicon Valley , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[18]  R. Lambert,et al.  Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration: Final Report , 2003 .

[19]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Scientific instrumentation and university research , 1992 .