A Multilingual Digital Mental Health and Well-Being Chatbot (ChatPal): Pre-Post Multicenter Intervention Study

BACKGROUND In recent years, advances in technology have led to an influx of mental health apps, in particular the development of mental health and well-being chatbots, which have already shown promise in terms of their efficacy, availability, and accessibility. The ChatPal chatbot was developed to promote positive mental well-being among citizens living in rural areas. ChatPal is a multilingual chatbot, available in English, Scottish Gaelic, Swedish, and Finnish, containing psychoeducational content and exercises such as mindfulness and breathing, mood logging, gratitude, and thought diaries. OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study is to evaluate a multilingual mental health and well-being chatbot (ChatPal) to establish if it has an effect on mental well-being. Secondary objectives include investigating the characteristics of individuals that showed improvements in well-being along with those with worsening well-being and applying thematic analysis to user feedback. METHODS A pre-post intervention study was conducted where participants were recruited to use the intervention (ChatPal) for a 12-week period. Recruitment took place across 5 regions: Northern Ireland, Scotland, the Republic of Ireland, Sweden, and Finland. Outcome measures included the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale, the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale, which were evaluated at baseline, midpoint, and end point. Written feedback was collected from participants and subjected to qualitative analysis to identify themes. RESULTS A total of 348 people were recruited to the study (n=254, 73% female; n=94, 27% male) aged between 18 and 73 (mean 30) years. The well-being scores of participants improved from baseline to midpoint and from baseline to end point; however, improvement in scores was not statistically significant on the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (P=.42), the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (P=.52), or the Satisfaction With Life Scale (P=.81). Individuals that had improved well-being scores (n=16) interacted more with the chatbot and were significantly younger compared to those whose well-being declined over the study (P=.03). Three themes were identified from user feedback, including "positive experiences," "mixed or neutral experiences," and "negative experiences." Positive experiences included enjoying exercises provided by the chatbot, while most of the mixed, neutral, or negative experiences mentioned liking the chatbot overall, but there were some barriers, such as technical or performance errors, that needed to be overcome. CONCLUSIONS Marginal improvements in mental well-being were seen in those who used ChatPal, albeit nonsignificant. We propose that the chatbot could be used along with other service offerings to complement different digital or face-to-face services, although further research should be carried out to confirm the effectiveness of this approach. Nonetheless, this paper highlights the need for blended service offerings in mental health care.

[1]  A. V. van Balkom,et al.  Barriers and facilitators for treatment-seeking in adults with a depressive or anxiety disorder in a Western-European health care setting: a qualitative study , 2022, BMC Psychiatry.

[2]  Esti Iturralde,et al.  Opportunities to Integrate Mobile App–Based Interventions Into Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment Services in the Wake of COVID-19 , 2021, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[3]  E. Ennis,et al.  Chatbots to Support Mental Wellbeing of People Living in Rural Areas: Can User Groups Contribute to Co-design? , 2021, Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science.

[4]  Min Song,et al.  Analysis of E-mental health research: mapping the relationship between information technology and mental healthcare , 2021, BMC Psychiatry.

[5]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Digital interventions for the treatment of depression: A meta-analytic review. , 2021, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  B. Nowrouzi-kia,et al.  The Characteristics of Canadian University Students’ Mental Health, Engagement in Activities and Use of Smartphones: A descriptive pilot study , 2021, Health psychology open.

[7]  R. Stockley,et al.  Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI‐assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice , 2021, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[8]  J. Gross,et al.  Acceptability and Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Therapy for Anxiety and Depression (Youper): Longitudinal Observational Study , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  Raymond R. Bond,et al.  Can Chatbots Help Support a Person’s Mental Health? Perceptions and Views from Mental Healthcare Professionals and Experts , 2021, ACM Trans. Comput. Heal..

[10]  I. Hickie,et al.  Implementing a digital health model of care in Australian youth mental health services: protocol for impact evaluation , 2021, BMC Health Services Research.

[11]  H. Ebeling,et al.  School professionals committed to student well-being , 2021, International journal of circumpolar health.

[12]  Ethel Ong,et al.  Investigating Students’ Use of a Mental Health Chatbot to Alleviate Academic Stress , 2020 .

[13]  Philip Gorwood,et al.  The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice , 2020, European Psychiatry.

[14]  John Torous,et al.  Digital Mental Health and COVID-19: Using Technology Today to Accelerate the Curve on Access and Quality Tomorrow , 2020, JMIR mental health.

[15]  E. Lindgren,et al.  Promoting Mental Health in School—Young People from Scotland and Sweden Sharing Their Perspectives , 2019, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[16]  Judith Moskowitz,et al.  Use of the Chatbot “Vivibot” to Deliver Positive Psychology Skills and Promote Well-Being Among Young People After Cancer Treatment: Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial , 2019, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[17]  Amit Baumel,et al.  Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  Russell Fulmer,et al.  Using Psychological Artificial Intelligence (Tess) to Relieve Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2018, JMIR mental health.

[19]  B. Inkster,et al.  An Empathy-Driven, Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent (Wysa) for Digital Mental Well-Being: Real-World Data Evaluation Mixed-Methods Study , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[20]  T. Michel,et al.  A review of youth mental health promotion apps towards their fit with youth media preferences , 2018, EAI Endorsed Trans. Pervasive Health Technol..

[21]  Kien Hoa Ly,et al.  A fully automated conversational agent for promoting mental well-being: A pilot RCT using mixed methods , 2017, Internet interventions.

[22]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Reporting Mental Health Symptoms: Breaking Down Barriers to Care with Virtual Human Interviewers , 2017, Front. Robot. AI.

[23]  K. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2017, JMIR mental health.

[24]  S. Stewart-Brown,et al.  Evaluating and establishing national norms for mental wellbeing using the short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): findings from the Health Survey for England , 2016, Quality of Life Research.

[25]  P. McGrath,et al.  Mental health literacy measures evaluating knowledge, attitudes and help-seeking: a scoping review , 2015, BMC Psychiatry.

[26]  P. Bech,et al.  The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2015, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[27]  H. Baumeister,et al.  The impact of guidance on Internet-based mental health interventions — A systematic review , 2014 .

[28]  Marius Veseth,et al.  Negotiating the coresearcher mandate – service users’ experiences of doing collaborative research on mental health , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation.

[29]  Derek Richards,et al.  Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Clinical psychology review.

[30]  Bruce Neal,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  A. Tennant,et al.  Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey , 2009, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[32]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[33]  E. Diener,et al.  Happiness Experienced: The Science of Subjective Well-being , 2013 .