Blindsight and shape perception: deficit of visual consciousness or of visual function?

Two people with homonymous right hemianopias were tested on a number of measures of non-conscious and conscious perception of shape in the blind field. Experiment 1 examined preparatory manual adjustments in grasping objects. Both subjects performed well above chance not only in three-dimensional location but also in preforming the hand to the shape, size and orientation of objects. In Experiment 2 single upper-case letters were briefly exposed in the blind field, and subjects made forced choices among 6 alternatives in the sighted field. Performance improved over blocks of trials and was above chance, but not dramatically. In Experiment 3 single upper-case words were briefly presented in the blind field, and subjects chose which of two words exposed after in the intact field was semantically closer. In Experiment 4 subjects had to give the meaning of single ambiguous words (e.g. BANK) presented both visually in the intact field and auditorily. Each ambiguous word was preceded by a single upper-case word briefly presented in the blind field, biasing each meaning on different blocks of trials (e.g. MONEY and RIVER). In Experiment 3, although results were in the appropriate direction, they were not consistently well above chance. By contrast, in Experiment 4 both subjects were consistently semantically biased to a high degree by words in the blind field. Experiments 2, 3 and 4 taken together suggest that indirect techniques (priming) are more sensitive to showing effects of non-conscious perception than direct ones (forced-choice). More importantly the experiments indicate that not only orientation but curvature, structural descriptions of component strokes and spatial ordering of letters are registered non-consciously in the blind field. Experiment 5 examined after-images in the blind and sighted fields, showing veridical conscious perception of shape in the blind field provided it was accompanied by a shape in the sighted field which together formed a good Gestalt. Experiment 6 showed conscious perception of illusory contours spanning the hemifields induced by Kanizsa figures. The experiments suggest that aspects of shape are much better perceived in blindsight than previously thought, that this is independent of their use in motor control, that the main deficit in blindsight is one of consciousness, and that the loss of conscious vision in the blind field is far from total. The effects and their relationship to those in other neuropsychological deficits suggest an intimate link between perceptual consciousness, attention and object perception.

[1]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[2]  K H Ruddock,et al.  Residual vision in patients with retrogeniculate lesions of the visual pathways. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[4]  Lawrence Weiskrantz,et al.  Blindsight—Not an Island Unto Itself , 1995 .

[5]  R. Gregory The intelligent eye , 1970 .

[6]  I. D. Brown,et al.  Reduction of copying errors with selected alphanumeric subsets. , 1975 .

[7]  A. Gellatly Perception of an Illusory Triangle with Masked Inducing Figure , 1980, Perception.

[8]  K H Ruddock,et al.  Human visual responses in the absence of the geniculo-calcarine projection. , 1980, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Insights into the reach to grasp movement , 1994 .

[10]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  The Ferrier Lecture, 1989 - Outlooks for blindsight: explicit methodologies for implicit processes , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  K. Patterson,et al.  Phonological Spelling , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  G. Schneider,et al.  Contrasting visuomotor functions of tectum and cortex in the golden hamster , 1967, Psychologische Forschung.

[14]  J Zihl,et al.  Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage. A review of 55 cases. , 1985, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[16]  B. Bridgeman Conscious vs Unconscious Processes , 1992 .

[17]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Spatial summation across the vertical meridian in hemianopics: A test of blindsight , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Jon Driver,et al.  Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection , 1994 .

[19]  S. Coren,et al.  Attention : contemporary theory and analysis , 1972 .

[20]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[21]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[22]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Temporal dissociation of motor responses and subjective awareness. A study in normal subjects. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  K Patterson,et al.  Letter-by-letter reading: psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  A. Marcel Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  A. Marcel Conscious and preconscious recognition on polysemous words: Locating selective effects of prior verbal contexts , 1980 .

[26]  Tim Shallice,et al.  Lexical processing in the absence of explicit word identification: Evidence from a letter-by-letter reader , 1986 .

[27]  T. Torjussen Residual function in cortically blind hemifields. , 1976, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[28]  H B Coslett,et al.  Reading in pure alexia. The effect of strategy. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  A. Milner,et al.  Cerebral correlates of visual awareness , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[31]  T. Torjussen Visual processing in cortically blind hemifields , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  S Zeki,et al.  Conscious visual perception without V1. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  A. Marcel Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  Y Rossetti,et al.  Grasping without form discrimination in a hemianopic field , 1996, Neuroreport.

[35]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[36]  Anthony J. Marcel,et al.  Phenomenal experience and functionalism. , 1988 .

[37]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Letter-by-letter Reading: Psychological Descriptions of a Neurologial Syndrome , 1982 .

[38]  L. Weiskrantz,et al.  Parameters affecting conscious versus unconscious visual discrimination with damage to the visual cortex (V1). , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  M. Jeannerod Chapter 1 Object Oriented Action , 1994 .

[40]  L. Weiskrantz Some contributions of neuropsychology of vision and memory to the problem of consciousness. , 1988 .

[41]  E. Warrington,et al.  "Blindsight": Vision in a field defect. , 1974, Lancet.

[42]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Factors affecting visual sensitivity in a hemianopic subject. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[43]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[44]  R. Held,et al.  Residual Visual Function after Brain Wounds involving the Central Visual Pathways in Man , 1973, Nature.

[45]  H. Coslett,et al.  Evidence for preserved reading in 'pure alexia'. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.