Performance of Emergency Department Screening Criteria for an Early ECG to Identify ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background Timely diagnosis of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the emergency department (ED) is made solely by ECG. Obtaining this test within 10 minutes of ED arrival is critical to achieving the best outcomes. We investigated variability in the timely identification of STEMI across institutions and whether performance variation was associated with the ED characteristics, the comprehensiveness of screening criteria, and the STEMI screening processes. Methods and Results We examined STEMI screening performance in 7 EDs, with the missed case rate (MCR) as our primary end point. The MCR is the proportion of primarily screened ED patients diagnosed with STEMI who did not receive an ECG within 15 minutes of ED arrival. STEMI was defined by hospital discharge diagnosis. Relationships between the MCR and ED characteristics, screening criteria, and STEMI screening processes were assessed, along with differences in door‐to‐ECG times for captured versus missed patients. The overall MCR for all 7 EDs was 12.8%. The lowest and highest MCRs were 3.4% and 32.6%, respectively. The mean difference in door‐to‐ECG times for captured and missed patients was 31 minutes, with a range of 14 to 80 minutes of additional myocardial ischemia time for missed cases. The prevalence of primarily screened ED STEMIs was 0.09%. EDs with the greatest informedness (sensitivity+specificity−1) demonstrated superior performance across all other screening measures. Conclusions The 29.2% difference in MCRs between the highest and lowest performing EDs demonstrates room for improving timely STEMI identification among primarily screened ED patients. The MCR and informedness can be used to compare screening across EDs and to understand variable performance.

[1]  F. Harrell,et al.  Incidence of emergency department visits for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a recent six-year period in the United States. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  Jane A. Linderbaum,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[4]  Kurt S. Hoffmayer,et al.  Prevalence and factors associated with false-positive ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnoses at primary percutaneous coronary intervention–capable centers: a report from the Activate-SF registry. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  Michael C Wu,et al.  Development and validation of a prioritization rule for obtaining an immediate 12-lead electrocardiogram in the emergency department to identify ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2012, American heart journal.

[6]  Viola Vaccarino,et al.  Association of age and sex with myocardial infarction symptom presentation and in-hospital mortality. , 2012, JAMA.

[7]  H. Krumholz,et al.  National performance on door-in to door-out time among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  M. Y. Yiadom Emergency department treatment of acute coronary syndromes. , 2011, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[9]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Association of door-in to door-out time with reperfusion delays and outcomes among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2011, JAMA.

[10]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  National efforts to improve door-to-balloon time results from the Door-to-Balloon Alliance. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  D. Diercks Triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: where should we set the bar? , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[14]  W. Weaver,et al.  Trends in reperfusion strategies, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, and in-hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. , 2008, American heart journal.

[15]  C. Cannon,et al.  Achieving rapid reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention remains a challenge: insights from American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines program. , 2008, American heart journal.

[16]  K. Eagle,et al.  Sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events , 2008, Heart.

[17]  Ori Ben-Yehuda,et al.  Effect of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram on activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory and door-to-balloon time in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  H. Krumholz,et al.  President's page: GAP-D2B: an alliance for quality. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  S. David,et al.  Feasibility of early emergency room notification to improve door‐to‐balloon times for patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  L. Newby,et al.  Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/Ameri , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  N. Perkins,et al.  Optimal Cut-point and Its Corresponding Youden Index to Discriminate Individuals Using Pooled Blood Samples , 2005, Epidemiology.

[24]  C. Preyra Coding response to a case-mix measurement system based on multiple diagnoses. , 2004, Health services research.

[25]  David Brieger,et al.  Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. , 2004, Chest.

[26]  Elliott M. Antman,et al.  Time Delay to Treatment and Mortality in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Every Minute of Delay Counts , 2004, Circulation.

[27]  V. Vaccarino,et al.  Gender and age differences in chief complaints of acute myocardial infarction (Worcester Heart Attack Study). , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[28]  L. Klein,et al.  Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry: development of a nomogram predictive of in-hospital mortality. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  J P Ornato,et al.  Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain. , 2000, JAMA.

[30]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. , 1999, JAMA.

[31]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Is This Patient Having a Myocardial Infarction , 1998 .

[32]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. , 1995, JAMA.