Radiographic wear assessment in a total knee prosthesis. 5- to 9-year follow-up study of 158 knees.

One hundred fifty-eight Porous-Coated Anatomic (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) primary total knee prostheses were evaluated clinically and radiographically to measure the remaining thickness of the plastic insert. Anteroposterior radiographs were taken with the beam guided parallel to the tibial plate by a fluoroscope. The knees were forced into varus and valgus, and the heights of the medial and lateral joint spaces, respectively, were measured with a digitizing table. Plastic insert wear could be calculated after correction with a magnification error factor, established by dividing the projected width of the tibial plate by the true size of the used component. After a mean follow-up period of 84 months (range, 58-116 months), wear was significantly higher for patients with osteoarthritis than rheumatoid arthritis and was 1.4 mm versus 0.7 mm medially (P < .0001) and 0.7 mm versus 0.4 mm laterally (P = .01). Wear was not correlated to thickness of the plastic insert or length of follow-up period. Young age or varus alignment contributed slightly to the amount of wear.

[1]  M J Midwinter,et al.  Survivorship analysis of the uncemented porous-coated anatomic knee replacement. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  R. Wixson,et al.  Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  P. Campbell,et al.  Massive femoral osteolysis and early disintegration of a polyethylene-bearing surface of a total knee replacement. A case report. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  D. Howie,et al.  A comparison of plain and fluoroscopically guided radiographs in the assessment of arthroplasty of the knee. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  Failure of the porous-coated anatomic prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty due to severe polyethylene wear. , 1993 .

[6]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  A case of massive osteolysis after knee prosthesis polyethylene failure. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[8]  C. Ranawat,et al.  A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  J. Rand,et al.  Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  S. Jones,et al.  Polyethylene wear in uncemented knee replacements. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  T. Wright,et al.  Wear of polyethylene in total joint replacements. Observations from retrieved PCA knee implants. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  R. E. Jensen,et al.  Analysis of the Failure of 122 Polyethylene Inserts From Uncemented Tibial Knee Components , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.