Autotelic and Instrumental Need for Touch: Searching for and Purchasing Apparel Online

Apparel is considered to be a category where haptic cues play a key role in evaluating product properties, and yet the consumer buying process in said retail channel is hindered by restricted product experience and evaluation due to the intrinsic absence of haptic options. The current research seeks to gain deeper insights into the knowledge and understanding of consumer autotelic and instrumental need for touch (NFT] in the search and purchase stages of buying apparel online. Using a self-reported questionnaire, data were collected from 227 subjects. Results indicate that consumers high in autotelic NFT and instrumental NFT show a lower likelihood to purchase apparel online. Also a significant moderating effect for utilitarian shopping orientation and instrumental NFT on online apparel search and purchase was also found. These findings have important implications for online retailers since overcoming the lack of NFT remains a major obstacle in the adoption of this channel. In addition, directions for future research are suggested.

[1]  Nancy Spears,et al.  Can Consumers Forgo the Need to Touch Products? An Investigation of Nonhaptic Situational Factors in an Online Context , 2013 .

[2]  Hyun-Hwa Lee,et al.  Exploring Multidimensions of Product Performance Risk in the Online Apparel Shopping Context , 2012 .

[3]  Joann Peck,et al.  In Search of a Surrogate for Touch: The Effect of Haptic Imagery on Perceived Ownership , 2013 .

[4]  Rafael Currás-Pérez,et al.  Online information quality as determinant of perceived risk reduction in e-commerce: an application to apparel virtual stores , 2011 .

[5]  S. Sands,et al.  Does the online channel pay? A comparison of online versus offline information search on physical store spend , 2010 .

[6]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Crafting Integrated Multichannel Retailing Strategies , 2010 .

[7]  Jane E. Workman,et al.  Fashion Consumer Groups, Gender, and Need for Touch , 2010 .

[8]  David Sprott,et al.  The influence of tactile input on the evaluation of retail product offerings , 2007 .

[9]  Trichy V. Krishnan,et al.  The impact of consumer Internet experience on channel preference and usage intentions across the different stages of the buying process , 2007 .

[10]  J. Peck,et al.  It Just Feels Good: Customers’ Affective Response to Touch and Its Influence on Persuasion: , 2006 .

[11]  David M. Shannon,et al.  Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping , 2006 .

[12]  HsiuJu Rebecca Yen,et al.  Risk-reducing signals for new online retailers: a study of single and multiple signalling effects , 2006 .

[13]  Jose A Rosa,et al.  Keeping the Body in Mind: The Influence of Body Esteem and Body Boundary Aberration on Consumer Beliefs and Purchase Intentions , 2006 .

[14]  R. Dholakia,et al.  Multichannel retailing: A case study of early experiences , 2005 .

[15]  Deborah H. Lester,et al.  Internet Shopping and Buying Behavior of College Students , 2005 .

[16]  Nancy Spears,et al.  Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions , 2004 .

[17]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  How Varying Levels of Knowledge and Motivation Affect Search and Confidence during Consideration and Choice , 2004 .

[18]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The "Need for Touch" Scale , 2003 .

[19]  Kevin E. Voss,et al.  Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude , 2003 .

[20]  Joann Peck,et al.  To have and to Hold: The Influence of Haptic Information on Product Judgments , 2003 .

[21]  Jayoung Choi,et al.  Risk perception and e‐shopping: a cross‐cultural study , 2003 .

[22]  Soyeon Shim,et al.  Information Search and Shopping Intentions Through Internet for Apparel Products , 2003 .

[23]  Stephen M. Nowlis,et al.  The Effect of Examining Actual Products or Product Descriptions on Consumer Preference , 2003 .

[24]  K. Reynolds,et al.  Hedonic shopping motivations , 2003 .

[25]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  HEDONIC AND UTILITARIAN MOTIVATIONS FOR ONLINE RETAIL SHOPPING BEHAVIOR , 2001 .

[26]  Mary Ann Eastlick,et al.  An online prepurchase intentions model: The role of intention to search , 2001 .

[27]  M. Gilly,et al.  Shopping Online for Freedom, Control, and Fun , 2001 .

[28]  A. Rao,et al.  No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality , 2000 .

[29]  William R. Darden,et al.  Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value , 1994 .

[30]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[32]  R. Batra,et al.  Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes , 1991 .

[33]  Peter H. Bloch,et al.  Product Involvement As Leisure Behavior , 1984 .

[34]  E. Hirschman,et al.  The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun , 1982 .

[35]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[36]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[37]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process , 1972 .