Fourth generation ports – a question of agility?

Since the Second World War, ports have been going through an evolution which the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) refers to as generations. The generation of a port reflects whether the approach adopted by port authorities/operators in developing their activities is likely to be reactive or proactive. These activities start with the traditional ones (cargo loading and discharging) and end up with the establishment of a wide range of logistics and value‐added activities, developed in conjunction with industrial and commercial businesses. This generation of ports, classified as third generation, would be sufficient if the world economic growth pattern could be forecast with any certainty. Unfortunately, this is not the case and the external environment today comprises constant changes that are reflected in the high levels of market uncertainty. To cope with this uncertainty it is suggested that ports should adopt a new logistics approach, agility, which has already been employed in other industries. This paper provides a definition of fourth generation ports and a methodology for implementing the concept of agile ports.

[1]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? , 2001 .

[2]  Giovanni Ridolfi,et al.  Intermodel transportation in Europe: of Modes, corridors and nodes , 1994 .

[3]  Khalid Bichou,et al.  A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement , 2004 .

[4]  David L. Levy Lean Production in an International Supply Chain , 1997 .

[5]  Daniel Berry,et al.  The BPR SCOPE concept in leveraging improved supply chain performance , 1999, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[6]  A Burgess,et al.  No Need for Speed in Short Sea Shipping , 2004 .

[7]  John Bicheno,et al.  The Lean Toolbox , 1999 .

[8]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  From lean production to the lean enterprise , 1994 .

[9]  David Upton,et al.  What Really Makes Factories Flexible , 1995 .

[10]  S. Vickery,et al.  Supply Chain Flexibility: An Empirical Study , 1999 .

[11]  H. Katayama,et al.  Agility, adaptability and leanness: A comparison of concepts and a study of practice , 1999 .

[12]  Peter Bernard Marlow,et al.  Measuring lean ports performance , 2003 .

[13]  W. A. Blonk Short sea shipping and inland waterways as part of a sustainable transportation system , 1994 .

[14]  Hossein Sharifi,et al.  A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations : An introduction , 1999 .

[15]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[16]  D. Aaker,et al.  THE NEED FOR STRATEGIC FLEXIBILITY , 1984 .

[17]  Tongtong Chen Yard operations in the container terminal-a study in the ‘unproductive moves’ , 1999 .

[18]  P. W. De Langen Time Centrality in Transport , 1999 .

[19]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Managing Information about Processes , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  R. O. Knorr Business Process Redesign: Key to Competitiveness , 1991 .

[21]  Ronald L. Meier,et al.  The Role of Purchasing in the Agile Enterprise , 1998 .

[22]  John Baker,et al.  Agility and flexibility: what's the difference? , 1996 .

[23]  D. Rosenfield,et al.  The New Dynamics of Global Manufacturing Site Location , 1994 .

[24]  Chris Butterworth,et al.  Value Stream Management , 1998 .

[25]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[26]  Alan O'Connor,et al.  THE ROLE OF TRANSPORT , 1978 .

[27]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes , 1999 .

[28]  G. Stalk Time-The Next Source of Competitive Advantage , 1988 .

[29]  Patrick M. Alderton,et al.  Port Management and Operations , 1999 .

[30]  Adrian Payne,et al.  The essence of services marketing , 1993 .

[31]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Design and implementation of agile manufacturing systems , 1999 .