The secular salvation story of the digital divide

Despite much discussion of thedigital divide, little academic work hasdirectly analyzed the specific political andpolicy contexts in which the concept is beingdeveloped and deployed. This paper undertakesan analysis of one such initiative, theactivity of the supranational DigitalOpportunity Task Force (DOT Force). Theanalysis provides a critical discursiveanalysis of the final report of the DOT Force,together with thick description of theprocesses by which it was produced. Theresolution of numerous antagonisms between theparticipants in the narrative of the finalreport reflects the field of power in which theDOT Force operates. The issue of the digitaldivide can be best understood as providing agenerative resource through which the variouspolitical interests represented in the DOTForce process can normatively reconfigure theconceptual and ethical possibilities itsignifies to renew a dominant, singular'secular salvation story' of the global. Thespecific closure, articulation and legitimationof the digital divide instantiates anaction-oriented temporality and a transformedmoral agenda, from a concern with inequality toa pressing inclusionary imperative to connectwith the promise of technology and development.

[1]  R. Levitas.  The Inclusive Society?: Social Exclusion and New Labour , 1998 .

[2]  C. Mouffe,et al.  Hegemony and Socialist Strategy , 1985 .

[3]  N. Fairclough,et al.  New Labour, New Language? , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[5]  Dean Colby,et al.  Conceptualizing The "Digital Divide": Closing The "Gap" By Creating A Postmodern Network That Distributes The Productive Power Of Speech , 2001 .

[6]  O. Gandy.  The Real Digital Divide: Citizens versus Consumers , 2002 .

[7]  Donald A. Schön.  Metaphor and Thought: Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy , 1993 .

[8]  R. Mansell.  From Digital Divides to Digital Entitlements in Knowledge Societies , 2002 .

[9]  William Wresch,et al.  Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[10]  B. Compaine.  The Digital Divide : Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth? , 2001 .

[11]  S. Žižek.  The sublime object of ideology , 1989 .

[12]  D. Lyon.  Surveillance as social sorting : privacy, risk, and digital discrimination , 2003 .

[13]  Geoffrey Kirkman and Peter K. Cornelius and Jeffery D. Sach Schwab.  Global Information Technology Report 2001-2002: Readiness for the Networked World , 2002 .

[14]  N. Couldry.  THE FORGOTTEN DIGITAL DIVIDE RESEARCHING SOCIAL EXCLUSION/ INCLUSION IN THE AGE OF PERSONALISED MEDIA , 2002 .

[15]  Robin Mansell,et al.  New media and the power of networks , 2004 .

[16]  Irrational Exuberance.  Irrational exuberance? , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  A. Melucci.  Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age , 1997 .

[18]  T. Mccormack,et al.  The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts , 1997 .

[19]  R. Levitas,et al.  The inclusive society , 2006 .

[20]  Michael Goldman,et al.  The Birth of a Discipline , 2001, The World Looks Like This From Here.

[21]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Defining the ‘Digital Divide’: Developing a Theoretical Understanding of Inequalities in the Information Age , 2002 .

[22]  J. L. Grand,et al.  Social Exclusion in Britain 1991—1995 , 1999 .

[23]  Ian Kearns.  Code red : progressive politics in the digital age , 2002 .

[24]  Chris Carter,et al.  New Deals, No Wheels: Social Exclusion, Tele-options and Electronic Ontology , 2000 .

[25]  J. Cassidy,et al.  Dot.Con: The Greatest Story Ever Sold , 2002 .

[26]  Peter A. Chow-White,et al.  Digital Divide , 2018, Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets.

[27]  J. V. Dijk.  The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media , 2005 .

[28]  J. Clapp,et al.  Development as freedom , 1999 .

[29]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  ‘E-stablishing’ an Inclusive Society? Technology, Social Exclusion and UK Government Policy Making , 2002, Journal of Social Policy.