Characteristics and causes of America's polarized politics

Analysts and pundits increasingly perceive a widening gulf between "red states" and "blue states." Yet the research to support that perception is scattered and sometimes difficult to parse. America's polarized politics, it is said, poses fundamental dangers for democratic and accountable government. Heightened partisanship is thought to degrade deliberation in Congress and threaten the integrity of other institutions, from the courts to the media. But, how deep do the country's political divisions actually run? Are they truly wreaking havoc upon the social fabric? Has America become a house divided? This important new book, Red and Blue Nation?, gets to the bottom of this perplexing issue. The first of two volumes cosponsored by Brookings and the Hoover Institution carefully considers the extent to which polarized views among political leaders and activists are reflected in the population at large. It pays particular attention to factors such as the increased influence of religion and the changing nature of the media. The authors show that while the severity of the country's "culture wars" is often overstated, significant fissures have opened. In Red and Blue Nation? leading journalists and scholars combine their different insights to enrich our understanding of the issue, offering thoughtful analyses of the underlying problems. This comprehensive and accessible discussion of the polarization debate will be an essential resource for policymakers, scholars, and anyone interested in the health of American public discourse. Contributors include Alan I. Abramowitz (Emory University), David W. Brady (Hoover Institution), Peter Beinart (The New Republic), Sarah A. Binder (Brookings Institution), James Campbell (State University of New York at Buffalo), Carl Cannon (National Journal), E.J. Dionne, Jr. (Brookings Institution), Gregg Easterbrook (Brookings Institution), Thomas B. Edsall (Washington Post), Morris P. Fiorina (Hoover Institution), William A. Galston (Brookings Institution), Hahrie C. Han (Wellesley College), Gary C. Jacobson (University of California, San Diego), Andrew Kohut (Pew Research Center for The People & The Press), Matthew Levendusky (Stanford University), Thomas E. Mann (Brookings Institution), Diana C. Mutz (University of Pennsylvania), Pietro S. Nivola (Brookings Institution), Tom Rosenstiel (Project for Excellence in Journalism), and Alan Wolfe (Boston College).

[1]  Hahrie Han,et al.  Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate? , 2007 .

[2]  Byron E. Shafer,et al.  The End of Southern Exceptionalism: Class, Race, and Partisan Change in the Postwar South , 2007 .

[3]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches , 2006 .

[4]  Drawing the Line on District Competition , 2006, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[5]  Thomas E. Mann,et al.  The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track , 2006 .

[6]  C. Anderson.  Losers' Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy , 2005 .

[7]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America , 2004 .

[8]  B. Woodward.  Plan of Attack , 2004 .

[9]  Stanley B. Greenberg.  The Two Americas: Our Current Political Deadlock and How to Break It , 2004 .

[10]  A. Rivlin,et al.  Restoring Fiscal Sanity: How to Balance the Budget , 2004 .

[11]  Michael F. Holt.  The Fate of Their Country: Politicians, Slavery Extension, and the Coming of the Civil War , 2004 .

[12]  Thomas Frank,et al.  What's the Matter with Kansas? , 2004 .

[13]  M. Baum.  Soft news goes to war , 2011 .

[14]  J. Hamilton.  All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News , 2003 .

[15]  The 2002 Midterm Election: A Typical or an Atypical Midterm? , 2003, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[16]  Bruce Bimber and Richard Davis.  Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections , 2003 .

[17]  Barry C. Burden,et al.  Why Americans Split Their Tickets: Campaigns, Competition, and Divided Government , 2002 .

[18]  David C. Barker,et al.  Rushed to Judgment: Talk Radio, Persuasion, and American Political Behavior , 2002 .

[19]  Mack D. Mariani,et al.  Diverging Parties: Realignment, Social Change, and Political Polarization , 2002 .

[20]  Gary W. Cox,et al.  ELBRIDGE GERRY ’ S SALAMANDER The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution , 2002 .

[21]  Earl Black,et al.  The Rise of Southern Republicans , 2002 .

[22]  Marc J. Hetherington,et al.  Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Grant A. Wacker.  Heaven Below: Early Pentecostals and American Culture , 2001 .

[24]  Larry M. Bartels.  Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996 , 2000 .

[25]  Gary W. Cox,et al.  Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems , 1997 .

[26]  R. Inglehart.  Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies , 1997 .

[27]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[28]  James F. Wilson.  The Moral Sense , 1994 .

[29]  T. E. Patterson.  Out Of Order , 1993 .

[30]  M. R. Hershey.  The Constructed Explanation: Interpreting Election Results in the 1984 Presidential Race , 1992, The Journal of Politics.

[31]  T. Edsall,et al.  Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics , 1991 .

[32]  E. Dionne,et al.  Why Americans Hate Politics , 1991 .

[33]  David W. Rohde.  Parties and leaders in the postreform house , 1991 .

[34]  W. Bennett,et al.  Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States , 1990 .

[35]  E. Uslaner.  The Transformation of the U.S. Senate@@@Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[36]  William H. Flanigan,et al.  The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. , 1988 .

[37]  J. Judis.  William F. Buckley, Jr., patron saint of the conservatives , 1988 .

[38]  P. S. Nivola,et al.  The politics of energy conservation , 1987 .

[39]  D. Hallin.  The Media, the War in Vietnam, and Political Support: A Critique of the Thesis of an Oppositional Media , 1984, The Journal of Politics.

[40]  Bruce E. Cain,et al.  The Reapportionment Puzzle , 1984 .

[41]  Peter Clecak.  America's Quest for the Ideal Self: Dissent and Fulfillment in the 60s and 70s , 1983 .

[42]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Beyond Adversary Democracy , 1980 .

[43]  John R. Petrocik.  Transformations of the American Party System: Political Coalitions from the New Deal to the 1970s , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[44]  David R. Mayhew.  Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals , 1974, Polity.

[45]  J. Sundquist.  Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States , 1974 .

[46]  D. Kennedy.  Progressivism : the critical issues , 1971 .

[47]  Daniel P. Moynihan,et al.  Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding , 1969 .

[48]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[49]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .