Quantifying the source–sink balance and carbohydrate content in three tomato cultivars

Supplementary lighting is frequently applied in the winter season for crop production in greenhouses. The effect of supplementary lighting on plant growth depends on the balance between assimilate production in source leaves and the overall capacity of the plants to use assimilates. This study aims at quantifying the source–sink balance and carbohydrate content of three tomato cultivars differing in fruit size, and to investigate to what extent the source/sink ratio correlates with the potential fruit size. Cultivars Komeet (large size), Capricia (medium size), and Sunstream (small size, cherry tomato) were grown from 16 August to 21 November, at similar crop management as in commercial practice. Supplementary lighting (High Pressure Sodium lamps, photosynthetic active radiation at 1 m below lamps was 162 μmol photons m-2 s-1; maximum 10 h per day depending on solar irradiance level) was applied from 19 September onward. Source strength was estimated from total plant growth rate using periodic destructive plant harvests in combination with the crop growth model TOMSIM. Sink strength was estimated from potential fruit growth rate which was determined from non-destructively measuring the fruit growth rate at non-limiting assimilate supply, growing only one fruit on each truss. Carbohydrate content in leaves and stems were periodically determined. During the early growth stage, ‘Komeet’ and ‘Capricia’ showed sink limitation and ‘Sunstream’ was close to sink limitation. During this stage reproductive organs had hardly formed or were still small and natural irradiance was high (early September) compared to winter months. Subsequently, during the fully fruiting stage all three cultivars were strongly source-limited as indicated by the low source/sink ratio (average source/sink ratio from 50 days after planting onward was 0.17, 0.22, and 0.33 for ‘Komeet,’ ‘Capricia,’ and ‘Sunstream,’ respectively). This was further confirmed by the fact that pruning half of the fruits hardly influenced net leaf photosynthesis rates. Carbohydrate content in leaves and stems increased linearly with the source/sink ratio. We conclude that during the early growth stage under high irradiance, tomato plants are sink-limited and that the level of sink limitation differs between cultivars but it is not correlated with their potential fruit size. During the fully fruiting stage tomato plants are source-limited and the extent of source limitation of a cultivar is positively correlated with its potential fruit size.

[1]  M. Stitt,et al.  Coordination of carbon supply and plant growth. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[2]  A. D. Koning,et al.  Development and dry matter distribution in glasshouse tomato : a quantitative approach , 1994 .

[3]  H. Schnyder The role of carbohydrate storage and redistribution in the source‐sink relations of wheat and barley during grain filling — a review , 1993 .

[4]  M. Génard,et al.  Soluble sugars mediate sink feedback down-regulation of leaf photosynthesis in field-grown Coffea arabica. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[5]  C. Körner,et al.  Source/sink removal affects mobile carbohydrates in Pinus cembra at the Swiss treeline , 2002, Trees.

[6]  A. Makino,et al.  Relationship between the suppression of photosynthesis and starch accumulation in the pod-removed bean , 2000 .

[7]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Influence of Sink-Source Interaction on Dry Matter Production in Tomato , 1995 .

[8]  P. Hocking,et al.  The Distribution and Identity of Assimilates in Tomato with Special Reference to Stem Reserves , 1994 .

[9]  Z. Plaut,et al.  Effect of altered sink: source ratio on photosynthetic metabolism of source leaves. , 1987, Plant physiology.

[10]  Katsumi Suzuki,et al.  Responses of leaf photosynthesis and plant growth to altered source–sink balance in a Japanese and a Dutch tomato cultivar , 2011 .

[11]  I. F. Wardlaw,et al.  Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants. , 1990, The New phytologist.

[12]  Roar Moe,et al.  THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL LIGHT IN YEAR ROUND PRODUCTION OF GREENHOUSE CROPS IN NORWAY , 2006 .

[13]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Dry Matter Partitioning in Tomato: Validation of a Dynamic Simulation Model , 1996 .

[14]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Dry Matter Production in a Tomato Crop: Measurements and Simulation , 1995 .

[15]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Tomato growth and yield : quantitative analysis and synthesis , 1996 .

[16]  R. Besford Photosynthetic acclimation in tomato plants grown in high CO2 , 2004, Vegetatio.

[17]  L. Marcelis,et al.  Sink strength as a determinant of dry matter partitioning in the whole plant. , 1996, Journal of experimental botany.

[18]  Govindjee,et al.  Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration: Focus on Plant Respiration , 2005, Photosynthesis Research.

[19]  B. Drake,et al.  Increased photosynthetic capacity of Scirpus olneyi after 4 years of exposure to elevated CO2 , 1991 .

[20]  L. Marcelis,et al.  Growth analysis of sweet pepper fruits (Capsicum annuum L.) , 1995 .

[21]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Model Selection for Nondestructive Quantification of Fruit Growth in Pepper , 2012 .

[22]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Horticultural Lighting in the Netherlands: New Developments , 2006 .

[23]  A. Elings,et al.  Leaf photosynthetic and morphological responses to elevated CO2 concentration and altered fruit number in the semi-closed greenhouse , 2012 .

[24]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Factors affecting the number of leaves preceding the first inflorescence in the tomato. , 1992 .

[25]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  A single locus confers tolerance to continuous light and allows substantial yield increase in tomato , 2014, Nature Communications.

[26]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Genetic differences in fruit-set patterns are determined by differences in fruit sink strength and a source : sink threshold for fruit set. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[27]  M. Paul,et al.  Sink regulation of photosynthesis. , 2001, Journal of experimental botany.

[28]  A. McCormick,et al.  Sink strength regulates photosynthesis in sugarcane. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[29]  F. Milthorpe,et al.  Assimilate Source-Sink Relationships in Capsicum annuum L. III. The Effects of Fruit Excision on Photosynthesis and Leaf and Stem Carbohydrates. , 1978 .

[30]  M. Talón,et al.  Regulation of photosynthesis through source: sink imbalance in citrus is mediated by carbohydrate content in leaves , 2002 .

[31]  A. Fernie,et al.  An update on source-to-sink carbon partitioning in tomato , 2014, Front. Plant Sci..

[32]  J. Dieleman,et al.  Impact of light on leaf initiation: a matter of photosynthate availability in the apical bud? , 2014, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[33]  D. Luquet,et al.  Is plant growth driven by sink regulation? Implications for crop models, phenotyping approaches and ideotypes , 2007 .

[34]  L. Ho,et al.  Regulation of tomato fruit size by plant density and truss thinning , 1995 .

[35]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Dry matter distribution in tomato and cucumber. , 1989 .

[36]  S. Ruuska,et al.  Starch storage in the stems of wheat plants: localization and temporal changes. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[37]  C. P. Jacovides,et al.  Global photosynthetically active radiation and its relationship with global solar radiation in the Eastern Mediterranean basin , 2003 .

[38]  J. Patrick,et al.  Crop yield components - photoassimilate supply- or utilisation limited-organ development? , 2014, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[39]  A. Gosselin,et al.  Acclimation of Two Tomato Species to High Atmospheric CO(2): I. Sugar and Starch Concentrations. , 1989, Plant physiology.

[40]  L. T. Evans,et al.  PHOTOSYNTHESIS, CARBON PARTITIONING, AND YIELD , 1981 .

[41]  K. Burton,et al.  Source—sink Relationships and Carbon Metabolism in Tomato Leaves 1. 14C Assimilate Compartmentation , 1983 .