With a Clean Conscience

Theories of moral judgment have long emphasized reasoning and conscious thought while downplaying the role of intuitive and contextual influences. However, recent research has demonstrated that incidental feelings of disgust can influence moral judgments and make them more severe. This study involved two experiments demonstrating that the reverse effect can occur when the notion of physical purity is made salient, thus making moral judgments less severe. After having the cognitive concept of cleanliness activated (Experiment 1) or after physically cleansing themselves after experiencing disgust (Experiment 2), participants found certain moral actions to be less wrong than did participants who had not been exposed to a cleanliness manipulation. The findings support the idea that moral judgment can be driven by intuitive processes, rather than deliberate reasoning. One of those intuitions appears to be physical purity, because it has a strong connection to moral purity.

[1]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Heart Strings and Purse Strings , 2004, Psychological science.

[2]  M. Hauser Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong , 2006 .

[3]  Ivanei E. Bramati,et al.  The Moral Affiliations of Disgust: A Functional MRI Study , 2005, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.

[4]  G. Clore,et al.  Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment , 2008, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

[5]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[6]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing , 2006, Science.

[7]  Paul Bloom,et al.  The intelligence of the moral intuitions: comment on Haidt (2001). , 2003, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Haidt,et al.  The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. , 2008 .

[9]  J. Haidt The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[10]  F. Costin The Scrambled Sentence Test: a Group Measure of Hostility , 1969 .

[11]  T. Wheatley,et al.  Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe , 2005, Psychological science.

[12]  J. Prinz,et al.  The emotional basis of moral judgments , 2006 .

[13]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of emotions, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[14]  December,et al.  The moral mind : How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues , and perhaps even modules , 2007 .

[15]  Jennifer S. Beer,et al.  Deciding versus Reacting: Conceptions of Moral Judgment and the Reason-Affect Debate , 2007 .

[16]  J. Haidt,et al.  Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  P. Rozin,et al.  Body, Psyche, and Culture: The Relationship between Disgust and Morality , 1997 .

[18]  H. Aarts,et al.  Smells Like Clean Spirit , 2005, Psychological science.